Determinants of Put-Call Disparity: Kospi 200 Index Options

IF 1.7 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Behavioral Finance Pub Date : 2021-09-11 DOI:10.1080/15427560.2021.1974442
Sam-soo Kim, Jimmy Lockwood, L. Lockwood, Hong Miao
{"title":"Determinants of Put-Call Disparity: Kospi 200 Index Options","authors":"Sam-soo Kim, Jimmy Lockwood, L. Lockwood, Hong Miao","doi":"10.1080/15427560.2021.1974442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many studies find that traditional option pricing models fail to work in practice. The implied volatility smile is one example. In this study, we examine deviations of spot prices from prices implied by put-call parity for Korean KOSPI 200 index options, one of the most actively traded derivative products in the world. Deviations are significant and economically meaningful across different moneyness categories spanning deep-in-the-money to deep-out-of-the-money options. Determinants of put-call disparities for the KOSPI 200 index options include past spot return moments, cognitive biases, and prior option trading volume relative to spot trading volume. We show mispricing is more likely to occur after periods of extreme downturns in the stock market, implying demand for put options increases relative to call options when investors become more likely to insure against extreme loss. We also show that put-call disparity rates have predictive power for future spot returns due to overreaction of KOSPI 200 index option traders, rather than to information contained in option prices.","PeriodicalId":47016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":"303 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2021.1974442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Many studies find that traditional option pricing models fail to work in practice. The implied volatility smile is one example. In this study, we examine deviations of spot prices from prices implied by put-call parity for Korean KOSPI 200 index options, one of the most actively traded derivative products in the world. Deviations are significant and economically meaningful across different moneyness categories spanning deep-in-the-money to deep-out-of-the-money options. Determinants of put-call disparities for the KOSPI 200 index options include past spot return moments, cognitive biases, and prior option trading volume relative to spot trading volume. We show mispricing is more likely to occur after periods of extreme downturns in the stock market, implying demand for put options increases relative to call options when investors become more likely to insure against extreme loss. We also show that put-call disparity rates have predictive power for future spot returns due to overreaction of KOSPI 200 index option traders, rather than to information contained in option prices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
买卖期权差异的决定因素:Kospi 200指数期权
许多研究发现,传统的期权定价模型在实践中并不适用。隐含波动率微笑就是一个例子。在本研究中,我们研究了韩国KOSPI 200指数期权(世界上交易最活跃的衍生产品之一)的现货价格与看跌期权平价所隐含的价格的偏差。在不同的金钱类别中,从“有钱”到“没钱”的选择,偏差都是显著的和有经济意义的。KOSPI 200指数期权的看跌期权差异的决定因素包括过去的现货收益时刻、认知偏差、之前的期权交易量相对于现货交易量。我们发现,在股市极度低迷时期后,更有可能出现定价错误,这意味着当投资者更有可能防范极端损失时,对看跌期权的需求相对于看涨期权增加。我们还表明,由于KOSPI 200指数期权交易者的过度反应,而不是期权价格中包含的信息,看跌期权差价率对未来现货回报具有预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: In Journal of Behavioral Finance , leaders in many fields are brought together to address the implications of current work on individual and group emotion, cognition, and action for the behavior of investment markets. They include specialists in personality, social, and clinical psychology; psychiatry; organizational behavior; accounting; marketing; sociology; anthropology; behavioral economics; finance; and the multidisciplinary study of judgment and decision making. The journal will foster debate among groups who have keen insights into the behavioral patterns of markets but have not historically published in the more traditional financial and economic journals. Further, it will stimulate new interdisciplinary research and theory that will build a body of knowledge about the psychological influences on investment market fluctuations. The most obvious benefit will be a new understanding of investment markets that can greatly improve investment decision making. Another benefit will be the opportunity for behavioral scientists to expand the scope of their studies via the use of the enormous databases that document behavior in investment markets.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Social Media Emotions: Evidence from the Kodak Manic Episode Business Cycle Variations in Manager and Investor Sentiment Indices The Effect of Analysts’ Reports on Stock Liquidity: The Interaction of Ratings and Qualitative Indicators Buy Now, Pay Later Loans, Social Norms, and Consumer Indebtedness Limited or Biased: Modeling Subrational Human Investors in Financial Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1