Evaluating galaxy dynamical masses from kinematics and jeans equilibrium in simulations

M. Kretschmer, A. Dekel, J. Freundlich, S. Lapiner, D. Ceverino, J. Primack
{"title":"Evaluating galaxy dynamical masses from kinematics and jeans equilibrium in simulations","authors":"M. Kretschmer, A. Dekel, J. Freundlich, S. Lapiner, D. Ceverino, J. Primack","doi":"10.1093/mnras/stab833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide prescriptions to evaluate the dynamical mass ($M_{\\rm dyn}$) of galaxies from kinematic measurements of stars or gas using analytic considerations and the VELA suite of cosmological zoom-in simulations at $z=1-5$. We find that Jeans or hydrostatic equilibrium is approximately valid for galaxies of stellar masses above $M_\\star \\!\\sim\\! 10^{9.5}M_\\odot$ out to $5$ effective radii ($R_e$). When both measurements of the rotation velocity $v_\\phi$ and of the radial velocity dispersion $\\sigma_r$ are available, the dynamical mass $M_{\\rm dyn} \\!\\simeq\\! G^{-1} V_c^2 r$ can be evaluated from the Jeans equation $V_c^2= v_\\phi^2 + \\alpha \\sigma_r^2$ assuming cylindrical symmetry and a constant, isotropic $\\sigma_r$. For spheroids, $\\alpha$ is inversely proportional to the S\\'ersic index $n$ and $\\alpha \\simeq 2.5$ within $R_e$ for the simulated galaxies. The prediction for a self-gravitating exponential disc, $\\alpha = 3.36(r/R_e)$, is invalid in the simulations, where the dominant spheroid causes a weaker gradient from $\\alpha \\!\\simeq\\! 1$ at $R_e$ to 4 at $5R_e$. The correction in $\\alpha$ for the stars due to the gradient in $\\sigma_r(r)$ is roughly balanced by the effect of the aspherical potential, while the effect of anisotropy is negligible. When only the effective projected velocity dispersion $\\sigma_l$ is available, the dynamical mass can be evaluated as $M_{\\rm dyn} = K G^{-1} R_e \\sigma_l^2$, where the virial factor $K$ is derived from $\\alpha$ given the inclination and $v_\\phi/\\sigma_r$. We find that the standard value $K=5$ is approximately valid only when averaged over inclinations and for compact and thick discs, as it ranges from 4.5 to above 10 between edge-on and face-on projections.","PeriodicalId":8452,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Astrophysics of Galaxies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Astrophysics of Galaxies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We provide prescriptions to evaluate the dynamical mass ($M_{\rm dyn}$) of galaxies from kinematic measurements of stars or gas using analytic considerations and the VELA suite of cosmological zoom-in simulations at $z=1-5$. We find that Jeans or hydrostatic equilibrium is approximately valid for galaxies of stellar masses above $M_\star \!\sim\! 10^{9.5}M_\odot$ out to $5$ effective radii ($R_e$). When both measurements of the rotation velocity $v_\phi$ and of the radial velocity dispersion $\sigma_r$ are available, the dynamical mass $M_{\rm dyn} \!\simeq\! G^{-1} V_c^2 r$ can be evaluated from the Jeans equation $V_c^2= v_\phi^2 + \alpha \sigma_r^2$ assuming cylindrical symmetry and a constant, isotropic $\sigma_r$. For spheroids, $\alpha$ is inversely proportional to the S\'ersic index $n$ and $\alpha \simeq 2.5$ within $R_e$ for the simulated galaxies. The prediction for a self-gravitating exponential disc, $\alpha = 3.36(r/R_e)$, is invalid in the simulations, where the dominant spheroid causes a weaker gradient from $\alpha \!\simeq\! 1$ at $R_e$ to 4 at $5R_e$. The correction in $\alpha$ for the stars due to the gradient in $\sigma_r(r)$ is roughly balanced by the effect of the aspherical potential, while the effect of anisotropy is negligible. When only the effective projected velocity dispersion $\sigma_l$ is available, the dynamical mass can be evaluated as $M_{\rm dyn} = K G^{-1} R_e \sigma_l^2$, where the virial factor $K$ is derived from $\alpha$ given the inclination and $v_\phi/\sigma_r$. We find that the standard value $K=5$ is approximately valid only when averaged over inclinations and for compact and thick discs, as it ranges from 4.5 to above 10 between edge-on and face-on projections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从运动学和模拟中的jeans平衡评价星系动态质量
我们提供处方来评估星系的动态质量($M_{\rm dyn}$)从恒星或气体的运动学测量使用分析的考虑和VELA套件宇宙学放大模拟$z=1-5$。我们发现金斯或流体静力平衡近似适用于恒星质量在$M_\star \!\sim\! 10^{9.5}M_\odot$到$5$有效半径($R_e$)以上的星系。当旋转速度$v_\phi$和径向速度色散$\sigma_r$的测量都可用时,动力质量$M_{\rm dyn} \!\simeq\! G^{-1} V_c^2 r$可以从Jeans方程$V_c^2= v_\phi^2 + \alpha \sigma_r^2$中评估,假设柱对称和常数,各向同性$\sigma_r$。对于椭球体,$\alpha$与ssamrsic指数$n$成反比,对于模拟星系,$\alpha \simeq 2.5$在$R_e$内。对于自引力指数盘$\alpha = 3.36(r/R_e)$的预测在模拟中是无效的,因为在模拟中,占主导地位的球体导致从$\alpha \!\simeq\! 1$ ($R_e$)到4 ($5R_e$)的梯度较弱。由于$\sigma_r(r)$中梯度对恒星的修正,在$\alpha$中被非球面势的影响大致平衡,而各向异性的影响可以忽略不计。当只有有效的投射速度色散$\sigma_l$可用时,动态质量可计算为$M_{\rm dyn} = K G^{-1} R_e \sigma_l^2$,其中,考虑倾角和$v_\phi/\sigma_r$,由$\alpha$推导出维里因子$K$。我们发现,标准值$K=5$仅在对倾斜度和致密和厚盘进行平均时才近似有效,因为它在边缘和正面投影之间的范围从4.5到10以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Whistler-regulated MHD: Transport equations for electron thermal conduction in the high $β$ intracluster medium of galaxy clusters Galaxy properties of type 1 and 2 X-ray selected AGN and a comparison among different classification criteria Chemical modeling of the complex organic molecules in the extended region around Sagittarius B2 Explaining the scatter in the galaxy mass–metallicity relation with gas flows METAL: The Metal Evolution, Transport, and Abundance in the Large Magellanic Cloud Hubble program. II. Variations of interstellar depletions and dust-to-gas ratio within the LMC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1