Variation in Use of Anti-Viral and Anti-Inflammatory Medications in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Results from the International Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS)

M.A. Garcia, S. Johnson, E. Sisson, C. Sheldrick, V.K. Kumar, K. Boman, S. Bolesta, V. Bansal, M. Bogojobic, J. Domecq, A. Lal, O. Gajic, R. Kashyap, A. Walkey
{"title":"Variation in Use of Anti-Viral and Anti-Inflammatory Medications in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Results from the International Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS)","authors":"M.A. Garcia, S. Johnson, E. Sisson, C. Sheldrick, V.K. Kumar, K. Boman, S. Bolesta, V. Bansal, M. Bogojobic, J. Domecq, A. Lal, O. Gajic, R. Kashyap, A. Walkey","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE: In the absence of effective therapies at the start of the Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, anti-viral and antiinflammatory medications were used for management of COVID-19 without robust evidence of their benefit. The patterns of use, implementation, and de-implementation of these medications is unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study on an international cohort of adult patients hospitalized from March 2020 to November 2020 with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 infection, receiving supplemental oxygen, and enrolled in the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) Registry. The primary outcome of interest was to describe the hospital-level variation in the most commonly used medications repurposed for empiric management of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, corticosteroids, and anti-IL-6 therapies). Secondary outcomes included geographic and temporal variation in medication use. RESULTS: Among 6,621 patients with COVID-19 across 86 hospitals (predominantly USbased [88%]), 1,373 (20.7%, hospital usage rates range 0%-96.4%) received corticosteroids, 1,302 (19.7%, range 0%-100%) received hydroxychloroquine, 602 (9.1%, range: 0%-65.7%) received remdesivir, and 405 (6.1%, range 0%-87.5%) received an anti-IL6 medication. USbased hospitals vs non-US hospitals showed differences in medication use with 9.9% vs. 0.8% use of remdesivir, 19.5% vs 33.2% use of corticosteroids, 18.7% vs 29.6% use of hydroxychloroquine and 6.3% vs. 3.9% use of anti-IL6 medications. Comparing use prior to July 2020 with use after July 2020, prescription of remdesivir increased from 6.5% to 20.5%, corticosteroid use increased from 17.5% to 35.0%, hydroxychloroquine use decreased from 23.9% to 1.1% and anti-IL6 use decreased from 7.0% to 2.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-level variation and geographic variation in use of repurposed anti-viral and anti-inflammatory medications for the management of COVID-19 infection was large. Coinciding with accrual of scientific evidence, the use of remdesivir and corticosteroids increased over time, while the use of hydroxychloroquine and anti-IL6 medications decreased over time. Further studies are needed to evaluate the drivers of hospital variation and impact on clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":23203,"journal":{"name":"TP92. TP092 CLINICAL ADVANCES IN SARS-COV-2 AND COVID-19","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP92. TP092 CLINICAL ADVANCES IN SARS-COV-2 AND COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

RATIONALE: In the absence of effective therapies at the start of the Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, anti-viral and antiinflammatory medications were used for management of COVID-19 without robust evidence of their benefit. The patterns of use, implementation, and de-implementation of these medications is unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study on an international cohort of adult patients hospitalized from March 2020 to November 2020 with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 infection, receiving supplemental oxygen, and enrolled in the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) Registry. The primary outcome of interest was to describe the hospital-level variation in the most commonly used medications repurposed for empiric management of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, corticosteroids, and anti-IL-6 therapies). Secondary outcomes included geographic and temporal variation in medication use. RESULTS: Among 6,621 patients with COVID-19 across 86 hospitals (predominantly USbased [88%]), 1,373 (20.7%, hospital usage rates range 0%-96.4%) received corticosteroids, 1,302 (19.7%, range 0%-100%) received hydroxychloroquine, 602 (9.1%, range: 0%-65.7%) received remdesivir, and 405 (6.1%, range 0%-87.5%) received an anti-IL6 medication. USbased hospitals vs non-US hospitals showed differences in medication use with 9.9% vs. 0.8% use of remdesivir, 19.5% vs 33.2% use of corticosteroids, 18.7% vs 29.6% use of hydroxychloroquine and 6.3% vs. 3.9% use of anti-IL6 medications. Comparing use prior to July 2020 with use after July 2020, prescription of remdesivir increased from 6.5% to 20.5%, corticosteroid use increased from 17.5% to 35.0%, hydroxychloroquine use decreased from 23.9% to 1.1% and anti-IL6 use decreased from 7.0% to 2.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-level variation and geographic variation in use of repurposed anti-viral and anti-inflammatory medications for the management of COVID-19 infection was large. Coinciding with accrual of scientific evidence, the use of remdesivir and corticosteroids increased over time, while the use of hydroxychloroquine and anti-IL6 medications decreased over time. Further studies are needed to evaluate the drivers of hospital variation and impact on clinical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19住院患者抗病毒和抗炎药物使用的差异:来自国际病毒感染和呼吸系统疾病通用研究(病毒)的结果
理由:在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行开始时缺乏有效的治疗方法,在没有强有力证据证明其益处的情况下,使用了抗病毒和抗炎药物来治疗COVID-19。这些药物的使用、实施和取消实施的模式尚不清楚。方法:我们对2020年3月至2020年11月住院的实验室确诊COVID-19感染的成人患者进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,接受了补充氧气,并登记在重症监护医学发现学会病毒感染和呼吸系统疾病通用研究(病毒)登记处。本研究的主要结局是描述医院水平上对COVID-19住院患者的经验管理中最常用药物(羟氯喹、瑞德西韦、皮质类固醇和抗il -6治疗)的变化。次要结局包括药物使用的地理和时间差异。结果:86家医院(主要是美国的[88%])的6621例COVID-19患者中,1,373例(20.7%,医院使用率范围为0%-96.4%)使用皮质类固醇,1,302例(19.7%,范围为0%-100%)使用羟氯喹,602例(9.1%,范围为0%-65.7%)使用瑞德西韦,405例(6.1%,范围为0%-87.5%)使用抗il -6药物。美国医院与非美国医院在药物使用方面存在差异,瑞德西韦使用率为9.9% vs 0.8%,皮质类固醇使用率为19.5% vs 33.2%,羟氯喹使用率为18.7% vs 29.6%,抗il - 6药物使用率为6.3% vs 3.9%。与2020年7月前和2020年7月后的使用情况相比,瑞德西韦的处方从6.5%增加到20.5%,皮质类固醇的使用率从17.5%增加到35.0%,羟氯喹的使用率从23.9%下降到1.1%,抗il - 6的使用率从7.0%下降到2.4%。结论:在COVID-19感染管理中,重新使用抗病毒和抗炎药物的医院水平和地理差异很大。随着科学证据的积累,瑞德西韦和皮质类固醇的使用随着时间的推移而增加,而羟氯喹和抗il - 6药物的使用随着时间的推移而减少。需要进一步的研究来评估医院变化的驱动因素及其对临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes in Proning Critically Ill Obese Patients Infected with COVID-19 Pneumonia - The PROSECOVA Trial Influence of Hypoxemia on Lymphocytes Subpopulations in SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia The COVID19 Experience: Preliminary Results in 1651 Patients at Two Multi-Ethnic Community Hospitals in NYC Prone Positioning to Improve Oxygenation in COVID-19 Patients Outside Critical Care (PRONE-COVID Study) Admission Respiratory Rate-Oxygenation (ROX) Index and Outcome in COVID-19 Pneumonia with Acute Respiratory Failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1