Sanitation strategies for reducing open defecation in rural areas of India and Ethiopia

IF 0.5 Q3 GEOGRAPHY AUC Geographica Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.14712/23361980.2023.5
Helena Humňalová, František Ficek
{"title":"Sanitation strategies for reducing open defecation in rural areas of India and Ethiopia","authors":"Helena Humňalová, František Ficek","doi":"10.14712/23361980.2023.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sanitation change continues to be on the forefront of the global development agenda, even as it is becoming clear that the targets established in the Sustainable Development Goals will not be met. But since improving access to safely managed sanitation facilities remains a cost-effective and impactful measure to improve people’s lives, it is still important to assess currently implemented policies to be able to learn from best practices and to understand how different approaches work under different contexts. This paper provides comparative analysis of country-level policies in India and Ethiopia, two countries that achieved notable progress in eliminating open defecation through distinct sanitation strategies, with the aim of confronting the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches. While in India the primary emphasis has been on the supply-side, i.e., provision of subsidized sanitation infrastructure, Ethiopian strategy prioritized the demand-side by addressing change in sanitation behavior through Community Total Led Sanitation. The analysis shows that neither of the strategies can fully achieve the sanitation change and a combination of both seems to be the most impactful approach in combating open defecation. It also argues that policymakers must consider not only local socioeconomic and budgetary constraints but also historical, institutional, sociocultural, and geographical specifics in deciding what type of subsidies would be the most fitting. At the same time, they also need to address the appropriate social norms to achieve the desirable change in sanitation behavior.","PeriodicalId":41831,"journal":{"name":"AUC Geographica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC Geographica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2023.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sanitation change continues to be on the forefront of the global development agenda, even as it is becoming clear that the targets established in the Sustainable Development Goals will not be met. But since improving access to safely managed sanitation facilities remains a cost-effective and impactful measure to improve people’s lives, it is still important to assess currently implemented policies to be able to learn from best practices and to understand how different approaches work under different contexts. This paper provides comparative analysis of country-level policies in India and Ethiopia, two countries that achieved notable progress in eliminating open defecation through distinct sanitation strategies, with the aim of confronting the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches. While in India the primary emphasis has been on the supply-side, i.e., provision of subsidized sanitation infrastructure, Ethiopian strategy prioritized the demand-side by addressing change in sanitation behavior through Community Total Led Sanitation. The analysis shows that neither of the strategies can fully achieve the sanitation change and a combination of both seems to be the most impactful approach in combating open defecation. It also argues that policymakers must consider not only local socioeconomic and budgetary constraints but also historical, institutional, sociocultural, and geographical specifics in deciding what type of subsidies would be the most fitting. At the same time, they also need to address the appropriate social norms to achieve the desirable change in sanitation behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少印度和埃塞俄比亚农村地区露天排便的卫生战略
尽管越来越明显的是,可持续发展目标中确定的具体目标将无法实现,但环境卫生改革仍然是全球发展议程的重中之重。但是,由于改善获得安全管理的卫生设施的机会仍然是改善人民生活的一项具有成本效益和影响力的措施,因此评估目前实施的政策仍然很重要,以便能够从最佳做法中学习,并了解不同方法在不同情况下如何发挥作用。本文对印度和埃塞俄比亚的国家一级政策进行了比较分析,这两个国家通过不同的卫生战略在消除露天排便方面取得了显著进展,目的是面对两种方法的优缺点。在印度,主要重点放在供应方,即提供有补贴的卫生基础设施,而埃塞俄比亚的战略则优先考虑需求方,通过社区全面主导的卫生设施解决卫生行为的变化。分析表明,这两种战略都不能完全实现卫生条件的改变,两者结合起来似乎是打击露天排便的最有效方法。报告还认为,决策者在决定哪种补贴最合适时,不仅要考虑当地的社会经济和预算限制,还要考虑历史、制度、社会文化和地理方面的具体情况。与此同时,他们还需要处理适当的社会规范,以实现卫生行为的理想变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AUC Geographica
AUC Geographica GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short-term geomorphic adjustments of bars in the Elbe, a large regulated river in Czechia Hazards profile of the Shigar Valley, Central Karakoram, Pakistan: Multicriteria hazard susceptibility assessment The nature, dimensions, causes and implications of in and out migration in North-East India The COVID-19 disaster in Mexico City: Exploring risk drivers at the local scale Improving vegetation spatial distribution mapping in arid and on coastal dune systems using GPR in Tottori Prefecture (Japan)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1