Differences in the primary culture, purification and biological characteristics between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells from rat aorta

Journal of Nanjing Medical University Pub Date : 2009-07-01 Epub Date: 2009-07-21 DOI:10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60063-0
Shaobo Hua , Zifang Songa , Qichang Zhenga , Jun Nieb
{"title":"Differences in the primary culture, purification and biological characteristics between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells from rat aorta","authors":"Shaobo Hua ,&nbsp;Zifang Songa ,&nbsp;Qichang Zhenga ,&nbsp;Jun Nieb","doi":"10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60063-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the differences of primary culture, purification and biological characteristics between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells from rat aorta.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Endothelial cells were obtained using the vascular ring adherence, collagenase digestion method and an improved vascular ring adherence method, while smooth muscle cells were separated from tissue sections of rat aorta. Clones of endothelial cells were selected by limiting dilution assay. Both cell types were identified using specific cell immunofluorescent markers, and phase contrast microscopy was used to observe the morphological disparity between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells at the single cell and colony level. Cell proliferation was determined by the cell counting kit-8. Differences between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells were evaluated in trypsin digestion time, attachment time and recovery after cryopreservation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Endothelial cells were obtained by all three methods. The improved vascular ring method provided the most reproducible results. Cells were in good condition, and of high purity. Smooth muscle cells were cultured successfully by the tissue fragment culture method. Clonal expansion of single endothelial cells was attained. The two cell types expressed their respective specific markers, and the rate of proliferation of smooth muscle cells exceeded that of endothelial cells. Endothelial cells were more sensitive to trypsin digestion than smooth muscle cells. In addition, they had a shorter adherence time and better recovery following cryopreservation than smooth muscle cells.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The improved vascular ring method was optimal for yielding endothelial cells. Limiting dilution is a novel and valid method for purifying primary endothelial cells from rat aorta. Primary rat endothelial cell and vascular smooth muscle cell cultures exhibited different morphological characteristics, proliferation rate, adherence time, susceptibility to trypsin digestion and recovery after cryopreservation. Our research can be a good foundation for further application in the regeneration of blood vessel.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nanjing Medical University","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 241-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60063-0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nanjing Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1007437609600630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the differences of primary culture, purification and biological characteristics between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells from rat aorta.

Methods

Endothelial cells were obtained using the vascular ring adherence, collagenase digestion method and an improved vascular ring adherence method, while smooth muscle cells were separated from tissue sections of rat aorta. Clones of endothelial cells were selected by limiting dilution assay. Both cell types were identified using specific cell immunofluorescent markers, and phase contrast microscopy was used to observe the morphological disparity between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells at the single cell and colony level. Cell proliferation was determined by the cell counting kit-8. Differences between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells were evaluated in trypsin digestion time, attachment time and recovery after cryopreservation.

Results

Endothelial cells were obtained by all three methods. The improved vascular ring method provided the most reproducible results. Cells were in good condition, and of high purity. Smooth muscle cells were cultured successfully by the tissue fragment culture method. Clonal expansion of single endothelial cells was attained. The two cell types expressed their respective specific markers, and the rate of proliferation of smooth muscle cells exceeded that of endothelial cells. Endothelial cells were more sensitive to trypsin digestion than smooth muscle cells. In addition, they had a shorter adherence time and better recovery following cryopreservation than smooth muscle cells.

Conclusion

The improved vascular ring method was optimal for yielding endothelial cells. Limiting dilution is a novel and valid method for purifying primary endothelial cells from rat aorta. Primary rat endothelial cell and vascular smooth muscle cell cultures exhibited different morphological characteristics, proliferation rate, adherence time, susceptibility to trypsin digestion and recovery after cryopreservation. Our research can be a good foundation for further application in the regeneration of blood vessel.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大鼠主动脉内皮细胞与平滑肌细胞原代培养、纯化及生物学特性的差异
目的探讨大鼠主动脉内皮细胞与平滑肌细胞原代培养、纯化及生物学特性的差异。方法采用血管环贴壁法、胶原酶消化法和改进血管环贴壁法获得内皮细胞,并从大鼠主动脉组织切片中分离平滑肌细胞。用极限稀释法筛选内皮细胞克隆。采用特异性细胞免疫荧光标记对两种细胞类型进行鉴定,并采用相差显微镜在单细胞和集落水平上观察内皮细胞和平滑肌细胞的形态差异。细胞计数试剂盒-8检测细胞增殖。观察内皮细胞和平滑肌细胞在胰蛋白酶消化时间、附着时间和冷冻后恢复方面的差异。结果三种方法均可获得内皮细胞。改进后的血管环法重现性最好。细胞状态良好,纯度高。采用组织碎片培养法成功培养平滑肌细胞。获得单个内皮细胞克隆扩增。两种细胞类型表达各自的特异性标记物,平滑肌细胞的增殖速度超过内皮细胞。内皮细胞比平滑肌细胞对胰蛋白酶消化更敏感。此外,与平滑肌细胞相比,它们具有更短的粘附时间和更好的低温保存后恢复。结论改进的血管环法是制备内皮细胞的最佳方法。限制稀释法是纯化大鼠主动脉原代内皮细胞的一种新颖有效的方法。大鼠内皮细胞和血管平滑肌细胞原代培养物在形态特征、增殖速率、黏附时间、胰蛋白酶消化敏感性和低温保存后恢复情况等方面均有差异。本研究为其在血管再生领域的进一步应用奠定了良好的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of sevoflurane on left ventricular function by speckle-tracking echocardiography in coronary bypass patients: A randomized trial Phosphorylated protein chip combined with artificial intelligence tools for precise drug screening Upregulation of α-ENaC induces pancreatic β-cell dysfunction, ER stress, and SIRT2 degradation Irisin/BDNF signaling in the muscle-brain axis and circadian system: a review ELABELA protects against diabetic kidney disease by activating high glucose-inhibited renal tubular autophagy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1