Is Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Socially Acceptable and Ethically Justifiable? Attitudes to and Adoption of Public Health Measures

Q1 Arts and Humanities Analysis and Metaphysics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.22381/am20202113
Sofia Bratu
{"title":"Is Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Socially Acceptable and Ethically Justifiable? Attitudes to and Adoption of Public Health Measures","authors":"Sofia Bratu","doi":"10.22381/am20202113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With growing evidence of COVID-19 mandatory vaccination policies, immunization coverage rate, and containment measures, there is an essential demand for comprehending whether mandatory vaccination can be a practical and adequate tool intended for intensifying the immunization coverage rate and thus less containment measures. In this research, prior findings were cumulated indicating that COVID-19 mandatory vaccination policies can ensure increased levels of immunization coverage. We carried out a quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science throughout February and April 2021, with search terms including \"COVID-19 mandatory vaccination,\" \"COVID-19 vaccine rollout,\" \"COVID-19 vaccine acceptance,\" and \"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.\" As we analyzed research published in 2021, only 226 papers met the eligibility criteria. By eliminating controversial or unclear findings (insufficient/irrelevant data), results unsubstantiated by replication, too imprecise or undetailed content, and studies having quite similar titles, we decided on 29, mainly empirical, sources. Subsequent analyses should develop on COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment.","PeriodicalId":38178,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Metaphysics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Metaphysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/am20202113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With growing evidence of COVID-19 mandatory vaccination policies, immunization coverage rate, and containment measures, there is an essential demand for comprehending whether mandatory vaccination can be a practical and adequate tool intended for intensifying the immunization coverage rate and thus less containment measures. In this research, prior findings were cumulated indicating that COVID-19 mandatory vaccination policies can ensure increased levels of immunization coverage. We carried out a quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science throughout February and April 2021, with search terms including "COVID-19 mandatory vaccination," "COVID-19 vaccine rollout," "COVID-19 vaccine acceptance," and "COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy." As we analyzed research published in 2021, only 226 papers met the eligibility criteria. By eliminating controversial or unclear findings (insufficient/irrelevant data), results unsubstantiated by replication, too imprecise or undetailed content, and studies having quite similar titles, we decided on 29, mainly empirical, sources. Subsequent analyses should develop on COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制性COVID-19疫苗接种是否为社会所接受,在道德上是否合理?对公共卫生措施的态度和采取
随着有关COVID-19强制性疫苗接种政策、免疫覆盖率和遏制措施的证据越来越多,人们迫切需要了解强制性疫苗接种是否能够成为一种实用和适当的工具,旨在提高免疫覆盖率,从而减少遏制措施。在这项研究中,积累了先前的研究结果,表明COVID-19强制性疫苗接种政策可以确保提高免疫覆盖率。我们在2021年2月和4月期间对ProQuest、Scopus和Web of Science进行了定量文献综述,搜索词包括“COVID-19强制性疫苗接种”、“COVID-19疫苗推出”、“COVID-19疫苗接受”和“COVID-19疫苗犹豫”。在我们分析2021年发表的研究时,只有226篇论文符合资格标准。通过消除有争议或不明确的发现(数据不足/不相关),未经复制证实的结果,过于不精确或不详细的内容,以及标题非常相似的研究,我们确定了29个主要是经验主义的来源。后续分析应将COVID-19疫苗接种作为就业条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analysis and Metaphysics
Analysis and Metaphysics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Lessons in Constructive and Destructive Arguing: Learning from the Disputes of the Hillel and Shammai Academies Smart Contracts in Blockchain-based Accounting Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence-enabled Auditing Techniques Multisensor Fusion and Dynamic Routing Technologies, Virtual Navigation and Simulation Modeling Tools, and Image Processing Computational and Visual Cognitive Algorithms across Web3-powered Metaverse Worlds Geospatial Mapping and Remote Sensing Technologies, Spatial Cognition and Visual Perception Algorithms, and Virtual Navigation and Ambient Scene Detection Tools across the Blockchain-based Metaverse Object Recognition and Virtual Retail Algorithms, Metaverse and Immersive Technologies, and Simulation Modeling and Spatial Data Acquisition Tools in Extended Reality Environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1