{"title":"Is Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Socially Acceptable and Ethically Justifiable? Attitudes to and Adoption of Public Health Measures","authors":"Sofia Bratu","doi":"10.22381/am20202113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With growing evidence of COVID-19 mandatory vaccination policies, immunization coverage rate, and containment measures, there is an essential demand for comprehending whether mandatory vaccination can be a practical and adequate tool intended for intensifying the immunization coverage rate and thus less containment measures. In this research, prior findings were cumulated indicating that COVID-19 mandatory vaccination policies can ensure increased levels of immunization coverage. We carried out a quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science throughout February and April 2021, with search terms including \"COVID-19 mandatory vaccination,\" \"COVID-19 vaccine rollout,\" \"COVID-19 vaccine acceptance,\" and \"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.\" As we analyzed research published in 2021, only 226 papers met the eligibility criteria. By eliminating controversial or unclear findings (insufficient/irrelevant data), results unsubstantiated by replication, too imprecise or undetailed content, and studies having quite similar titles, we decided on 29, mainly empirical, sources. Subsequent analyses should develop on COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment.","PeriodicalId":38178,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Metaphysics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Metaphysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/am20202113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With growing evidence of COVID-19 mandatory vaccination policies, immunization coverage rate, and containment measures, there is an essential demand for comprehending whether mandatory vaccination can be a practical and adequate tool intended for intensifying the immunization coverage rate and thus less containment measures. In this research, prior findings were cumulated indicating that COVID-19 mandatory vaccination policies can ensure increased levels of immunization coverage. We carried out a quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science throughout February and April 2021, with search terms including "COVID-19 mandatory vaccination," "COVID-19 vaccine rollout," "COVID-19 vaccine acceptance," and "COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy." As we analyzed research published in 2021, only 226 papers met the eligibility criteria. By eliminating controversial or unclear findings (insufficient/irrelevant data), results unsubstantiated by replication, too imprecise or undetailed content, and studies having quite similar titles, we decided on 29, mainly empirical, sources. Subsequent analyses should develop on COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment.
随着有关COVID-19强制性疫苗接种政策、免疫覆盖率和遏制措施的证据越来越多,人们迫切需要了解强制性疫苗接种是否能够成为一种实用和适当的工具,旨在提高免疫覆盖率,从而减少遏制措施。在这项研究中,积累了先前的研究结果,表明COVID-19强制性疫苗接种政策可以确保提高免疫覆盖率。我们在2021年2月和4月期间对ProQuest、Scopus和Web of Science进行了定量文献综述,搜索词包括“COVID-19强制性疫苗接种”、“COVID-19疫苗推出”、“COVID-19疫苗接受”和“COVID-19疫苗犹豫”。在我们分析2021年发表的研究时,只有226篇论文符合资格标准。通过消除有争议或不明确的发现(数据不足/不相关),未经复制证实的结果,过于不精确或不详细的内容,以及标题非常相似的研究,我们确定了29个主要是经验主义的来源。后续分析应将COVID-19疫苗接种作为就业条件。