“I feel like it’s capitalising on the poor”: electronic gaming machines, neoliberalism and the invisibility of social work

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Critical and Radical Social Work Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.1332/204986022x16703011487748
Nicole Bowne, Michele Jarldorn
{"title":"“I feel like it’s capitalising on the poor”: electronic gaming machines, neoliberalism and the invisibility of social work","authors":"Nicole Bowne, Michele Jarldorn","doi":"10.1332/204986022x16703011487748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic gaming machines are normalised business within Australia’s hotels and clubs. Concentrated within low socio-economic and disadvantaged communities, this high-intensity form of gambling creates the often-hidden addiction of problem gambling and the associated widespread social harms. This qualitative study uses radical social work thinking to explore gaming venue employees’ perceptions and experiences of implementing ‘responsible gambling measures’, ostensibly aimed at mitigating the social consequences and harms of problematic gambling. Our analysis reveals that neoliberal ideologies mean that gaming venue employees support ‘freedom of choice’ narratives, which ignore the structural influences at play when an individual becomes an ‘irresponsible’ consumer/gambler. Social workers must be cognisant of the ways in which the notion of the ‘(ir)responsible gambler’ skews how problem gambling and problem gamblers are viewed. The social harms from electronic gaming machines are complex and widespread, and deserve more recognition and attention in social work practice, policy and research.","PeriodicalId":44175,"journal":{"name":"Critical and Radical Social Work","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical and Radical Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204986022x16703011487748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic gaming machines are normalised business within Australia’s hotels and clubs. Concentrated within low socio-economic and disadvantaged communities, this high-intensity form of gambling creates the often-hidden addiction of problem gambling and the associated widespread social harms. This qualitative study uses radical social work thinking to explore gaming venue employees’ perceptions and experiences of implementing ‘responsible gambling measures’, ostensibly aimed at mitigating the social consequences and harms of problematic gambling. Our analysis reveals that neoliberal ideologies mean that gaming venue employees support ‘freedom of choice’ narratives, which ignore the structural influences at play when an individual becomes an ‘irresponsible’ consumer/gambler. Social workers must be cognisant of the ways in which the notion of the ‘(ir)responsible gambler’ skews how problem gambling and problem gamblers are viewed. The social harms from electronic gaming machines are complex and widespread, and deserve more recognition and attention in social work practice, policy and research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我觉得这是在利用穷人”:电子游戏机、新自由主义和社会工作的不可见性
在澳大利亚的酒店和俱乐部里,电子游戏机是正常的生意。这种高强度的赌博形式集中在社会经济地位低下和处境不利的社区,造成了经常隐藏的问题赌博成瘾和相关的广泛社会危害。本定性研究采用激进的社会工作思维来探讨博彩场所员工对实施“负责任的赌博措施”的看法和经验,表面上旨在减轻问题赌博的社会后果和危害。我们的分析表明,新自由主义意识形态意味着游戏场所的员工支持“选择自由”的叙事,这种叙事忽视了当个人成为“不负责任的”消费者/赌徒时所产生的结构性影响。社会工作者必须认识到,“(或)负责任的赌徒”的概念扭曲了人们对问题赌博和问题赌徒的看法。电子游戏机的社会危害是复杂而广泛的,值得在社会工作实践、政策和研究中予以更多的认识和关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Talking about needs and rights in inter-agency meetings: interpretive contests in Swedish welfare provision Maybe you can be too resilient: a sociological investigation into how student social workers perceive resilience in their practice Critique and Critical Social Work: a meta-theoretical perspective Who’s right? What rights? How? Rights debates in Irish social work: a call for nuance Lordship and bondage in the dialectics of social work: regulation and professional autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1