Public spaces in land use rating based on participatory mapping

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES Urban Research & Practice Pub Date : 2022-07-26 DOI:10.1080/17535069.2022.2106037
Anastasiia Galaktionova
{"title":"Public spaces in land use rating based on participatory mapping","authors":"Anastasiia Galaktionova","doi":"10.1080/17535069.2022.2106037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper presents citizens’ attitude to public spaces, which is a central topic in contemporary urban planning. Provided that the research concerning public spaces is rarely based on participatory methods, the paper introduces new quantitative data into scholarly research. Geo-located markers of positive and negative places, as well as proposals, were filtered through the city cadastre. The rating based on the quantitative comparison of spaces and places adds new insights to the existing body of knowledge. Providing statistically significant samples, participatory mapping allows comparing the impacts of public spaces, and thus, creates a perspective for urban planners and city authorities.","PeriodicalId":46604,"journal":{"name":"Urban Research & Practice","volume":"83 1","pages":"641 - 650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2106037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper presents citizens’ attitude to public spaces, which is a central topic in contemporary urban planning. Provided that the research concerning public spaces is rarely based on participatory methods, the paper introduces new quantitative data into scholarly research. Geo-located markers of positive and negative places, as well as proposals, were filtered through the city cadastre. The rating based on the quantitative comparison of spaces and places adds new insights to the existing body of knowledge. Providing statistically significant samples, participatory mapping allows comparing the impacts of public spaces, and thus, creates a perspective for urban planners and city authorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于参与式制图的公共空间土地利用等级
摘要本文探讨了市民对公共空间的态度,这是当代城市规划中的一个中心话题。鉴于公共空间研究很少采用参与式方法,本文将新的定量数据引入学术研究。积极和消极地方的地理位置标记,以及提案,通过城市地籍过滤。基于空间和地点的定量比较的排名为现有的知识体系增加了新的见解。参与式测绘提供了统计上显著的样本,可以比较公共空间的影响,从而为城市规划者和城市当局创造了一个视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Research & Practice
Urban Research & Practice URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Developer-driven co-housing in Denmark: strengths and weaknesses compared to resident-driven co-housing Shared challenges, divergent practices. The impact of institutional frameworks on area-based initiatives in Barcelona and Paris Evaluating ‘pocket’ public spaces in Al Wehdat refugee camp, Jordan: challenges and opportunities Urban policy in the framework of the 2030 agenda: balance and perspectives from Latin America and Europe The urban now: living in an age of urban globalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1