Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Taking Management Objectives as Reference Points from Peer Perspective

Hailiu Shi, Shengqun Chen, Yingming Wang, Yan Huang
{"title":"Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Taking Management Objectives as Reference Points from Peer Perspective","authors":"Hailiu Shi, Shengqun Chen, Yingming Wang, Yan Huang","doi":"10.1142/s0217595921500408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the management by objectives (MBO) theory, performance evaluations should take into account the achievement of management objectives (MOs). The most commonly used performance evaluation method — the cross-efficiency evaluation method — seldom considers the role of MOs as a reference point. According to the prospect theory, decision-makers underestimate the benefits that exceed the reference point; they also exaggerate the losses that fall below the reference point. This irrational psychology is more obvious when evaluating the performance evaluation of peers. As such, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method based on prospect theory, which takes MOs as a reference point from a peer perspective. First, taking MOs as reference points, a decision-making unit (DMU) chooses a set of weights for each peer, in order to maximize or minimize the prospects of the peer, according to the benevolent or aggressive attitude of the DMU. In order to improve the adaptability of the method, the precise number of MOs is further extended to be an interval number. Finally, the relationship between models, which are based on precise MOs and interval MOs, is illustrated by propositions. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method.","PeriodicalId":8478,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595921500408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

According to the management by objectives (MBO) theory, performance evaluations should take into account the achievement of management objectives (MOs). The most commonly used performance evaluation method — the cross-efficiency evaluation method — seldom considers the role of MOs as a reference point. According to the prospect theory, decision-makers underestimate the benefits that exceed the reference point; they also exaggerate the losses that fall below the reference point. This irrational psychology is more obvious when evaluating the performance evaluation of peers. As such, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method based on prospect theory, which takes MOs as a reference point from a peer perspective. First, taking MOs as reference points, a decision-making unit (DMU) chooses a set of weights for each peer, in order to maximize or minimize the prospects of the peer, according to the benevolent or aggressive attitude of the DMU. In order to improve the adaptability of the method, the precise number of MOs is further extended to be an interval number. Finally, the relationship between models, which are based on precise MOs and interval MOs, is illustrated by propositions. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同行视角下以管理目标为参照点的交叉效率评价方法
根据目标管理(MBO)理论,绩效评价应考虑管理目标的实现情况。目前最常用的绩效评价方法——交叉效率评价方法,很少考虑组织管理组织作为参考点的作用。根据前景理论,决策者低估了超过参考点的收益;他们还夸大了低于参考点的损失。这种非理性心理在评价同伴的绩效评价时表现得更为明显。为此,本文提出了一种基于前景理论的交叉效率评价方法,该方法从同行视角出发,以最大收益为参考点。首先,决策单元(decision-making unit, DMU)以MOs为参考点,根据决策单元的仁慈态度或攻击性态度,为每个同伴选择一组权重,以最大化或最小化同伴的前景。为了提高该方法的适应性,将MOs的精确数进一步扩展为区间数。最后,用命题说明了基于精确模态和区间模态的模型之间的关系。最后,通过数值算例说明了交叉效率评价方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty in Study of Social Networks: Robust Optimization and Machine Learning Optimality Conditions for E-Convex Interval-Valued Programming Problem Using gH-Symmetrical Derivative A Bicriterion Approach to Due Date Assignment Scheduling in Single-Machine with Position-Dependent Weights Approximation Algorithms for Spherical k-Means Problem with Penalties Using Local Search Techniques An Accelerated Three-Term Extension of a Descent Nonlinear Conjugate Gradient Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1