Combined Endoscopic–Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS) in the Management of Early Colorectal Lesions

J. Wlodarczyk, S. Lee
{"title":"Combined Endoscopic–Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS) in the Management of Early Colorectal Lesions","authors":"J. Wlodarczyk, S. Lee","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1760729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Over 14 million colonoscopies are performed annually in the United States. With the growing number of colonoscopies comes corresponding increases in the rates of colectomies performed for benign polyps. These advanced adenomas have the potential, if removed early, to promote decreased rates of colon cancer and improve patient survival. Difficult to resect polyps may be located at colonic flexures, tortuous turns in the colon, the ileocecal valve, or the appendiceal orifice presenting a unique challenge to endoscopic resection. Various advanced endoscopic techniques are now available for the resection of these polyps such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection, but these techniques have a steep learning curve and are technically challenging. For the community colorectal surgeon, relatively simpler options include combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS) and full-thickness laparo-endoscopic colonic excision (FLEX) for either the endoscopic or laparoscopic removal of challenging polyps. The FLEX procedure resembled a nonanatomic wedge resection of the colon with polyp, while CELS resembles a laparoscopically augmented EMR. With the technical success rate for CELS reportedly between 74 and 97%, the postoperative complication rate of less than 5%, and polyp recurrence rates bordering less than 2%, these procedures have the capacity to safely facilitate the complete removal of difficult-to-resect endoscopic polyps. The purpose of this review is to both provide recommendations for CELS and FLEX utilization for the resection of polyps and describe our operative techniques and tips and tools for increasing the efficacy of these procedures.","PeriodicalId":91014,"journal":{"name":"Digestive disease interventions","volume":"76 1","pages":"017 - 023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive disease interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1760729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Over 14 million colonoscopies are performed annually in the United States. With the growing number of colonoscopies comes corresponding increases in the rates of colectomies performed for benign polyps. These advanced adenomas have the potential, if removed early, to promote decreased rates of colon cancer and improve patient survival. Difficult to resect polyps may be located at colonic flexures, tortuous turns in the colon, the ileocecal valve, or the appendiceal orifice presenting a unique challenge to endoscopic resection. Various advanced endoscopic techniques are now available for the resection of these polyps such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection, but these techniques have a steep learning curve and are technically challenging. For the community colorectal surgeon, relatively simpler options include combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS) and full-thickness laparo-endoscopic colonic excision (FLEX) for either the endoscopic or laparoscopic removal of challenging polyps. The FLEX procedure resembled a nonanatomic wedge resection of the colon with polyp, while CELS resembles a laparoscopically augmented EMR. With the technical success rate for CELS reportedly between 74 and 97%, the postoperative complication rate of less than 5%, and polyp recurrence rates bordering less than 2%, these procedures have the capacity to safely facilitate the complete removal of difficult-to-resect endoscopic polyps. The purpose of this review is to both provide recommendations for CELS and FLEX utilization for the resection of polyps and describe our operative techniques and tips and tools for increasing the efficacy of these procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜-腹腔镜联合手术(CELS)治疗早期结直肠病变
在美国,每年有超过1400万例结肠镜检查。随着结肠镜检查次数的增加,良性息肉的结肠切除术率也相应增加。如果早期切除,这些晚期腺瘤有可能降低结肠癌的发病率,提高患者的生存率。难以切除的息肉可能位于结肠弯曲处、结肠弯曲处、回盲瓣或阑尾口,这对内镜切除构成了独特的挑战。各种先进的内镜技术目前可用于切除这些息肉,如内镜粘膜切除术(EMR)和内镜粘膜下剥离术,但这些技术有一个陡峭的学习曲线和技术上的挑战。对于社区结直肠外科医生来说,相对简单的选择包括内窥镜和腹腔镜联合手术(CELS)和全层腹腔镜-内窥镜结肠切除术(FLEX),用于内窥镜或腹腔镜切除息肉。FLEX手术类似于非解剖性结肠息肉楔形切除术,而CELS类似于腹腔镜增强EMR。据报道,CELS的技术成功率在74 - 97%之间,术后并发症发生率低于5%,息肉复发率低于2%,这些手术有能力安全地促进内镜下难以切除的息肉的完全切除。本综述的目的是为CELS和FLEX在息肉切除术中的应用提供建议,并描述我们的手术技术、技巧和工具,以提高这些手术的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Using Modern Radiation Therapy Techniques Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration: A Modified Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastric Varices Developing an Interventional Radiology Service Role of Interventional Radiology in the Management of Liver Transplant Complications in Children Pediatric Liver Interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1