Does Formative Assessment Improve Student Learning and Performance in Soil Science?

Peter M. Kopittke, J. Bernhard Wehr, Neal W. Menzies
{"title":"Does Formative Assessment Improve Student Learning and Performance in Soil Science?","authors":"Peter M. Kopittke,&nbsp;J. Bernhard Wehr,&nbsp;Neal W. Menzies","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2012.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil science students are required to apply knowledge from a range of disciplines to unfamiliar scenarios to solve complex problems. To encourage deep learning (with student performance an indicator of learning), a formative assessment exercise was introduced to a second-year soil science subject. For the formative assessment exercise, students were required to prepare a draft of a critical review of a current topic in soil science, and then (following guidance from staff members) provide feedback to each other through a peer assessment exercise. In contrast to expectations, the formative assessment did not appear to improve overall student performance in this task based upon their grades for this task. Furthermore, despite being given an exemplar and attending a workshop where tactics for searching the scientific literature were discussed, this did not increase the likelihood that students would cite studies from the scientific literature when conducting their critical review. Regardless of these observations, the students were positive and appreciated the feedback they received through the exercise. This study demonstrates the need to ensure that feedback is effective and enables students to identify their weaknesses and modify their work accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"41 1","pages":"59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2012.0001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2012.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Soil science students are required to apply knowledge from a range of disciplines to unfamiliar scenarios to solve complex problems. To encourage deep learning (with student performance an indicator of learning), a formative assessment exercise was introduced to a second-year soil science subject. For the formative assessment exercise, students were required to prepare a draft of a critical review of a current topic in soil science, and then (following guidance from staff members) provide feedback to each other through a peer assessment exercise. In contrast to expectations, the formative assessment did not appear to improve overall student performance in this task based upon their grades for this task. Furthermore, despite being given an exemplar and attending a workshop where tactics for searching the scientific literature were discussed, this did not increase the likelihood that students would cite studies from the scientific literature when conducting their critical review. Regardless of these observations, the students were positive and appreciated the feedback they received through the exercise. This study demonstrates the need to ensure that feedback is effective and enables students to identify their weaknesses and modify their work accordingly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形成性评价能提高学生土壤学的学习和表现吗?
土壤科学专业的学生需要将一系列学科的知识应用到不熟悉的场景中,以解决复杂的问题。为了鼓励深度学习(以学生的表现作为学习的指标),在二年级的土壤科学课程中引入了形成性评估练习。在形成性评估练习中,要求学生准备一份对土壤科学当前主题的批判性评论草稿,然后(在工作人员的指导下)通过同行评估练习向彼此提供反馈。与预期相反,形成性评估似乎并没有提高学生在这项任务中的整体表现。此外,尽管给出了一个范例并参加了一个讨论搜索科学文献策略的研讨会,但这并没有增加学生在进行批判性评论时引用科学文献研究的可能性。不管这些观察结果如何,学生们都是积极的,并感谢他们在练习中收到的反馈。这项研究表明,需要确保反馈是有效的,使学生能够识别自己的弱点,并相应地修改他们的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corn Rootworm: Small Insect, Big Impact Assessing Student Learning with Surveys and a Pre-Test/Post-Test in an Online Course Student Presentations of Case Studies to Illustrate Core Concepts in Soil Biogeochemistry Using Student Competition Field Trips to Increase Teaching and Learning Effectiveness JNRLSE Editorial Board Minutes for 2011
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1