Obligation in favour of the third party in the Iranian legal system

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2013.050530
M. Nasiri, A. M. Nafchi, Mojdeh Mehdikhani
{"title":"Obligation in favour of the third party in the Iranian legal system","authors":"M. Nasiri, A. M. Nafchi, Mojdeh Mehdikhani","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2013.050530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Article 196 of the Iranian Civil Law, it is stipulated that in transactions, one can insert obligations in favour of the third party, but most of the provisions have not been well-defined. Therefore, jurists have raised a number of questions about this issue. Namely, is there a need for the acceptance of the third party in the obligations? Can the contracting parties relinquish the rights they have created for the third party by revoking the contract? What should be done if the third party refuses to accept the obligations? Or, who would have standing to sue if the undertaker refuses to fulfil the obligations? The methodology for this research is of an analytic and descriptive nature. The authors try to offer answers to the above questions drawing on other legislations and jurisprudential rules.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"24 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2013.050530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Article 196 of the Iranian Civil Law, it is stipulated that in transactions, one can insert obligations in favour of the third party, but most of the provisions have not been well-defined. Therefore, jurists have raised a number of questions about this issue. Namely, is there a need for the acceptance of the third party in the obligations? Can the contracting parties relinquish the rights they have created for the third party by revoking the contract? What should be done if the third party refuses to accept the obligations? Or, who would have standing to sue if the undertaker refuses to fulfil the obligations? The methodology for this research is of an analytic and descriptive nature. The authors try to offer answers to the above questions drawing on other legislations and jurisprudential rules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗法律制度中有利于第三方的义务
《伊朗民法》第196条规定,在交易中可以加入有利于第三方的义务,但大多数规定都没有明确规定。因此,法学家对这一问题提出了一系列问题。也就是说,在义务中是否需要第三方的接受?缔约双方是否可以通过撤销合同来放弃他们为第三方创造的权利?如果第三方拒绝接受义务,该怎么办?或者,如果承办人拒绝履行义务,谁有资格起诉?本研究的方法论是分析性和描述性的。笔者试图借鉴其他立法和法理规则来回答上述问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1