Implementation of reproductive life planning (RLP) in primary health care supported by an evidence-based website

Melinda Koo Andersson, T. Tydén
{"title":"Implementation of reproductive life planning (RLP) in primary health care supported by an evidence-based website","authors":"Melinda Koo Andersson, T. Tydén","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2019.1695117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: The aims of the study were to evaluate how well the reproductive life plan (RLP) tool was implemented in practice and explore the utility of the website www.reproduktivlivsplan.se for patient counselling. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2018, in which 73 midwives in primary health care were asked to use the RLP tool and the website in their daily practice. Three months later, participants answered a questionnaire, based on normalisation process theory (NPT), about their implementation experience. Results: The response rate was 73% (n = 53). The mean length of midwifery experience was 15 years. Almost all respondents (89%) reported a positive attitude towards the tool and the website and their ability to use them in practice. The majority agreed to all statements about implementation of the RLP, according to NPT. Use of the RLP also made it easier for midwives to support clients in forming reproductive goals (85%, n = 45), give family planning advice (81%, n = 43), give advice about how to improve health before pregnancy (85%, n = 45) and give advice about how to preserve fertility (89%, n = 47). Nine out of ten respondents said they would recommend the website to other midwives. Conclusion: The RLP was well implemented among the respondents and the majority considered the website to be a useful tool. Long-term studies are needed to further elucidate the effects of the RLP on changes in health behaviour and pregnancy outcomes.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"88 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1695117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The aims of the study were to evaluate how well the reproductive life plan (RLP) tool was implemented in practice and explore the utility of the website www.reproduktivlivsplan.se for patient counselling. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2018, in which 73 midwives in primary health care were asked to use the RLP tool and the website in their daily practice. Three months later, participants answered a questionnaire, based on normalisation process theory (NPT), about their implementation experience. Results: The response rate was 73% (n = 53). The mean length of midwifery experience was 15 years. Almost all respondents (89%) reported a positive attitude towards the tool and the website and their ability to use them in practice. The majority agreed to all statements about implementation of the RLP, according to NPT. Use of the RLP also made it easier for midwives to support clients in forming reproductive goals (85%, n = 45), give family planning advice (81%, n = 43), give advice about how to improve health before pregnancy (85%, n = 45) and give advice about how to preserve fertility (89%, n = 47). Nine out of ten respondents said they would recommend the website to other midwives. Conclusion: The RLP was well implemented among the respondents and the majority considered the website to be a useful tool. Long-term studies are needed to further elucidate the effects of the RLP on changes in health behaviour and pregnancy outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一个以证据为基础的网站的支持下,在初级卫生保健中实施生殖生活计划
摘要目的:本研究的目的是评估生殖生命计划(RLP)工具在实践中的实施情况,并探讨www.reproduktivlivsplan.se网站对患者咨询的效用。方法:2018年进行了一项横断面研究,要求73名初级卫生保健助产士在日常实践中使用RLP工具和网站。三个月后,参与者根据正常化过程理论(NPT)回答了一份关于他们实施经验的问卷。结果:有效率为73% (n = 53)。助产经验的平均长度为15年。几乎所有的受访者(89%)都对该工具和网站以及他们在实践中使用它们的能力持积极态度。根据《不扩散核武器条约》,大多数国家同意关于实施RLP的所有声明。使用RLP还使助产士更容易支持客户制定生殖目标(85%,n = 45),提供计划生育咨询(81%,n = 43),就如何改善孕前健康提供咨询(85%,n = 45),并就如何保持生育能力提供咨询(89%,n = 47)。十分之九的受访者表示,他们会向其他助产士推荐该网站。结论:RLP在被调查者中得到了很好的实施,大多数人认为网站是一个有用的工具。需要进行长期研究,以进一步阐明RLP对健康行为变化和妊娠结局的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain relief during intrauterine device placement in nulligravid women with both oral ketorolac and an analgesic: a double-blinded randomised trial Legal abortion requests and outcomes for women when the law is restrictive – experience from a referral centre in south-eastern Brazil ‘Do I want children later in life?’ Reproductive intentions of 1700 adolescents Oestrogens in oral contraception: considerations for tailoring prescription to women’s needs Prevalence of high-risk HPV and cervical dysplasia in IUD users and controls: a cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1