Temporary suspension of visiting as experienced by non-covid-19 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, their relatives, and health professionals; a multimethod study

Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.18261/nsf.13.1.4
C. Hansen, Maria Louise Iversen, Melannie Bramming-Hansen, Trine Tvedegaard Jakobsen, Charlotte Voss Soerensen
{"title":"Temporary suspension of visiting as experienced by non-covid-19 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, their relatives, and health professionals; a multimethod study","authors":"C. Hansen, Maria Louise Iversen, Melannie Bramming-Hansen, Trine Tvedegaard Jakobsen, Charlotte Voss Soerensen","doi":"10.18261/nsf.13.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hospitals worldwide implemented visitor restrictions policies due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Aim: To investigate the impact of visitor restrictions experienced by non-Covid-19 orthopaedic patients, their relatives, and health professionals from a person-centred practice (PCP) perspective. Methods: Seventy-eight patients/relatives completed a self-reported survey. Template Analysis was conducted on twenty-five telephone interviews and one focus group interview. Findings: Despite accepting the restrictions for the country's good, we found a profound need for visits among the relatives. However, one-fifth of the patients were content, and one-third got more rest than earlier admissions. We uncovered a current readiness to develop an organisational PCP culture focused on the good of the patient. All stakeholders were attentive to the importance of the relatives' role, and the need for the involvement of relatives as team players became evident. Conclusion: The study emphasised the need for PCP strategies to involve relatives when visitor restrictions are necessary.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/nsf.13.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Hospitals worldwide implemented visitor restrictions policies due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Aim: To investigate the impact of visitor restrictions experienced by non-Covid-19 orthopaedic patients, their relatives, and health professionals from a person-centred practice (PCP) perspective. Methods: Seventy-eight patients/relatives completed a self-reported survey. Template Analysis was conducted on twenty-five telephone interviews and one focus group interview. Findings: Despite accepting the restrictions for the country's good, we found a profound need for visits among the relatives. However, one-fifth of the patients were content, and one-third got more rest than earlier admissions. We uncovered a current readiness to develop an organisational PCP culture focused on the good of the patient. All stakeholders were attentive to the importance of the relatives' role, and the need for the involvement of relatives as team players became evident. Conclusion: The study emphasised the need for PCP strategies to involve relatives when visitor restrictions are necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
暂停接受骨科手术的非covid-19患者及其亲属和卫生专业人员的探视;多方法研究
背景:由于SARS-CoV-2大流行,世界各地的医院都实施了访客限制政策。目的:从以人为本的实践(PCP)的角度,调查非covid -19骨科患者、其亲属和卫生专业人员访问限制的影响。方法:78名患者/亲属完成自我报告调查。对25个电话访谈和1个焦点小组访谈进行了模板分析。调查结果:尽管为了国家的利益,我们接受了这些限制,但我们发现人们对亲戚之间的探访有着深刻的需求。然而,五分之一的患者感到满意,三分之一的患者比之前入院的患者得到了更多的休息。我们发现,目前准备发展一种组织PCP文化,以病人的利益为重点。所有利益相关者都注意到亲属角色的重要性,亲属作为团队成员参与的必要性变得很明显。结论:本研究强调,当有必要限制访客时,需要采取包括亲属在内的PCP策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1