Leven na de dood: het Nieuwe Testament als toetssteen voor enkele contemporaine opvattingen

T. van Spanje
{"title":"Leven na de dood: het Nieuwe Testament als toetssteen voor enkele contemporaine opvattingen","authors":"T. van Spanje","doi":"10.21827/tr.64.4.356-369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the question of the difference between NT documents and their contemporary religious and philosophical thought world on ‘life after death’. Consideration of only a few themes discloses that the NT differs widely from Hellenistic views, and that it is closely connected to some views in early Judaism as far as these stand in continuity with the OT. The NT view on ‘life after death’ stands far more on its own than the History of Religions School suggests. Modern thought on the ‘afterlife’ reveals that the NT is still relevant; theological methods should not blur its original message, nor biblical authority (OT and NT) be minimized.","PeriodicalId":36470,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/tr.64.4.356-369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the question of the difference between NT documents and their contemporary religious and philosophical thought world on ‘life after death’. Consideration of only a few themes discloses that the NT differs widely from Hellenistic views, and that it is closely connected to some views in early Judaism as far as these stand in continuity with the OT. The NT view on ‘life after death’ stands far more on its own than the History of Religions School suggests. Modern thought on the ‘afterlife’ reveals that the NT is still relevant; theological methods should not blur its original message, nor biblical authority (OT and NT) be minimized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死后的生命:新约作为一些当代观点的试金石
本文探讨了新约文献与当时宗教哲学思想界关于“死后生命”的差异问题。只要考虑几个主题,就会发现新约与希腊化的观点有很大的不同,而且它与早期犹太教的一些观点密切相关,因为这些观点与旧约保持着连续性。NT关于“死后的生命”的观点比宗教史学派所认为的要独立得多。关于“来世”的现代思想表明,新约仍然是相关的;神学方法不应该模糊它的原始信息,也不应该贬低圣经的权威(旧约和新约)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Levensvreugde omdat God volhoudt (Psalm 103:8) Focus. De theologische nalatenschap van ds. G. Boer De eeuwigheidsdimensie van het heil. Een verkenning vanuit de praktijk van missionaire pioniers Waar raakt Gods heil de mens? Over fragmenten van het heil Epiloog
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1