D. D. Nascimento, B. Petriz, Larissa Prego, S. A. Souza, J. Prestes
{"title":"Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise on Hemodynamic and Cardiovascular Response in Hypertensive Subjects: a systematic review","authors":"D. D. Nascimento, B. Petriz, Larissa Prego, S. A. Souza, J. Prestes","doi":"10.17921/2447-8938.2020V22N1P61-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nBlood flow restriction (BFR) exercise is an effective approach for increasing muscle mass and muscle strength. However, it remains unclear if the magnitude of those positive adaptations will lead to similar responses for hemodynamic variables in hypertensive subjects. The present systematic review aimed to assess the effects of exercise with and without BFR on acute and chronic hemodynamic and cardiovascular responses in hypertensive subjects. Studies published between 2000 and 2019 were included. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials (NRCTs) which evaluated hemodynamic and cardiovascular response in hypertensive subjects practicing exercise with BFR or those comparing hemodynamic and cardiovascular response during exercise with and without BFR were also eligible. A literature research of English and non-English-language articles for review was conducted across PubMed and Science Direct databases, including reference lists of relevant papers. Level of evidence was determined according to the criteria described by Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. In addition, risk of bias was assessed using the modified version of Downs and Black checklist. Four studies were included involving 60 participants; from those, three were NRCTs and one was a RCT. Three studies included in this review evaluated the effect of resistance training with and without BFR and only one the effect of aerobic exercise. The score on Downs and Black checklist was 11. The main findings were that the included patients’ characteristics were not clearly reported, and all the revised studies contained significant methodological limitations. Thus, all studies were classified as being of poor methodological quality. In addition, the evidence level provided in all the revised studies was level IIb only (i.e. poor-quality studies). Considering the limited available evidence, no definitive recommendation about BFR exercise in hypertensive subjects can be addressed due to the weak methodological design of the studies. \nKeywords: Resistance Training. Hypertension. Vascular Occlusion. Blood Flow Restriction. \nResumo \nO exercicio fisico com restricao do fluxo sanguineo (RFS) e uma abordagem eficaz para o aumento da massa muscular e forca muscular. No entanto, ainda nao esta claro se a magnitude dessas adaptacoes positivas levara a respostas semelhantes para as variaveis hemodinâmicas e cardiovasculares em individuos hipertensos. A presente revisao sistematica objetivou avaliar os efeitos do exercicio fisico com e sem RFS sobre respostas hemodinâmicas e cardiovasculares agudas e cronicas em hipertensos. Estudos publicados entre 2000 e 2019 foram incluidos. Ensaios clinicos randomizados e nao-randomizados em que avaliaram a resposta hemodinâmica e cardiovascular em hipertensos que praticavam exercicio fisico com RFS ou aqueles que compararam a resposta hemodinâmica e cardiovascular durante o exercicio com e sem RFS tambem foram elegiveis. Uma pesquisa bibliografica de artigos em ingles e nao ingles para a presente revisao foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed e Science Direct, incluindo listas de referencia de artigos relevantes. O nivel de evidencia foi determinado de acordo com os criterios descritos pelo Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. Alem disso, a qualidade dos artigos foi avaliada usando a versao modificada da lista de verificacao de Downs e Black. Foram incluidos quatro estudos envolvendo 60 participantes nesta revisao. Destes, tres eram ensaios clinicos nao randomizados e somente um era ensaio clinico randomizado. Tres estudos incluidos nesta revisao avaliaram o efeito do treinamento resistido com e sem RFS e apenas um avaliou o efeito do exercicio aerobico. A pontuacao na lista de verificacao de Downs e Black foi 11. Os principais achados foram que as caracteristicas dos pacientes incluidos nao foram claramente relatadas e todos os estudos revisados continham limitacoes metodologicas significativas. Assim, todos os estudos foram classificados como de baixa qualidade metodologica. Alem disso, o nivel de evidencia fornecido em todos os estudos revisados era apenas de nivel IIb (ou seja, estudos de baixa qualidade). Considerando as poucas evidencias disponiveis, nenhuma recomendacao definitiva sobre o exercicio fisico com RFS em individuos hipertensos pode ser abordada devido ao fraco desenho metodologico dos estudos. \nPalavras-chave: Treinamento Resistido. Hypertensao. Oclusao Vascular. Restricao do Fluxo Sanguineo.","PeriodicalId":15873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science","volume":"66 1","pages":"61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17921/2447-8938.2020V22N1P61-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract
Blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise is an effective approach for increasing muscle mass and muscle strength. However, it remains unclear if the magnitude of those positive adaptations will lead to similar responses for hemodynamic variables in hypertensive subjects. The present systematic review aimed to assess the effects of exercise with and without BFR on acute and chronic hemodynamic and cardiovascular responses in hypertensive subjects. Studies published between 2000 and 2019 were included. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials (NRCTs) which evaluated hemodynamic and cardiovascular response in hypertensive subjects practicing exercise with BFR or those comparing hemodynamic and cardiovascular response during exercise with and without BFR were also eligible. A literature research of English and non-English-language articles for review was conducted across PubMed and Science Direct databases, including reference lists of relevant papers. Level of evidence was determined according to the criteria described by Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. In addition, risk of bias was assessed using the modified version of Downs and Black checklist. Four studies were included involving 60 participants; from those, three were NRCTs and one was a RCT. Three studies included in this review evaluated the effect of resistance training with and without BFR and only one the effect of aerobic exercise. The score on Downs and Black checklist was 11. The main findings were that the included patients’ characteristics were not clearly reported, and all the revised studies contained significant methodological limitations. Thus, all studies were classified as being of poor methodological quality. In addition, the evidence level provided in all the revised studies was level IIb only (i.e. poor-quality studies). Considering the limited available evidence, no definitive recommendation about BFR exercise in hypertensive subjects can be addressed due to the weak methodological design of the studies.
Keywords: Resistance Training. Hypertension. Vascular Occlusion. Blood Flow Restriction.
Resumo
O exercicio fisico com restricao do fluxo sanguineo (RFS) e uma abordagem eficaz para o aumento da massa muscular e forca muscular. No entanto, ainda nao esta claro se a magnitude dessas adaptacoes positivas levara a respostas semelhantes para as variaveis hemodinâmicas e cardiovasculares em individuos hipertensos. A presente revisao sistematica objetivou avaliar os efeitos do exercicio fisico com e sem RFS sobre respostas hemodinâmicas e cardiovasculares agudas e cronicas em hipertensos. Estudos publicados entre 2000 e 2019 foram incluidos. Ensaios clinicos randomizados e nao-randomizados em que avaliaram a resposta hemodinâmica e cardiovascular em hipertensos que praticavam exercicio fisico com RFS ou aqueles que compararam a resposta hemodinâmica e cardiovascular durante o exercicio com e sem RFS tambem foram elegiveis. Uma pesquisa bibliografica de artigos em ingles e nao ingles para a presente revisao foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed e Science Direct, incluindo listas de referencia de artigos relevantes. O nivel de evidencia foi determinado de acordo com os criterios descritos pelo Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. Alem disso, a qualidade dos artigos foi avaliada usando a versao modificada da lista de verificacao de Downs e Black. Foram incluidos quatro estudos envolvendo 60 participantes nesta revisao. Destes, tres eram ensaios clinicos nao randomizados e somente um era ensaio clinico randomizado. Tres estudos incluidos nesta revisao avaliaram o efeito do treinamento resistido com e sem RFS e apenas um avaliou o efeito do exercicio aerobico. A pontuacao na lista de verificacao de Downs e Black foi 11. Os principais achados foram que as caracteristicas dos pacientes incluidos nao foram claramente relatadas e todos os estudos revisados continham limitacoes metodologicas significativas. Assim, todos os estudos foram classificados como de baixa qualidade metodologica. Alem disso, o nivel de evidencia fornecido em todos os estudos revisados era apenas de nivel IIb (ou seja, estudos de baixa qualidade). Considerando as poucas evidencias disponiveis, nenhuma recomendacao definitiva sobre o exercicio fisico com RFS em individuos hipertensos pode ser abordada devido ao fraco desenho metodologico dos estudos.
Palavras-chave: Treinamento Resistido. Hypertensao. Oclusao Vascular. Restricao do Fluxo Sanguineo.
血流量限制(BFR)运动是增加肌肉质量和肌肉力量的有效方法。然而,目前尚不清楚这些积极适应的程度是否会导致高血压受试者血液动力学变量的类似反应。本系统综述旨在评估有和没有BFR的运动对高血压受试者急性和慢性血流动力学和心血管反应的影响。纳入了2000年至2019年发表的研究。随机对照试验(rct)和非随机试验(NRCTs)评估高血压受试者在使用BFR进行运动时的血流动力学和心血管反应,或比较使用和不使用BFR进行运动时的血流动力学和心血管反应。通过PubMed和Science Direct数据库对英文和非英文文章进行文献研究,包括相关论文的参考文献列表。证据水平是根据牛津循证医学中心描述的标准确定的。此外,使用改良版Downs和Black检查表评估偏倚风险。包括四项研究,涉及60名参与者;其中3个是nrct, 1个是随机对照试验。本综述中包括的三项研究评估了有和没有BFR的阻力训练的效果,而有氧运动的效果只有一项。在Downs和Black检查表上得分是11分。主要发现是纳入的患者的特征没有明确的报道,所有修订的研究都存在显著的方法学局限性。因此,所有研究都被归类为方法学质量差的研究。此外,所有修订研究提供的证据水平仅为IIb级(即低质量研究)。考虑到现有的证据有限,由于研究的方法学设计薄弱,对高血压受试者进行BFR运动没有明确的建议。关键词:抗阻训练;高血压血管闭塞。血流限制。resume (resume) O (exercise ficicio) O (exercise fiscal) O (exercise fiscal) O (limit) O (flux blood blood, RFS) O (blood blood blood) O (blood blood blood) O (blood blood blood) O (blood blood blood)因此,在高血压患者中,不同类型的血凝素、血凝素、心血管疾病患者对左旋阳性反应的适应程度不同。本研究的目的是探讨运动对高血压患者血液代谢、心血管疾病和心血管疾病反应的影响。Estudos publicados entre 2000和2019论坛包括。临床随机对照研究:随机对照研究:心血管高血压患者的血管内皮素与反应性血液流变学研究;临床随机对照研究:运动血管内皮素与反应性血液流变学研究;运动血管内皮素与反应性血液流变学研究;本文对《公共医学与科学指南》的文献基础进行了修订,包括文献相关参考文献列表。牛津循证医学中心(Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine)的研究人员描述说,没有证据表明,在诊断和诊断标准方面存在缺陷。因此,一个合格的资格证书的资格证书的有效性,并提出了一个反修改的数据列表,以核实唐斯和布莱克。论坛包括四分之一的工作室,涉及60名参与者。然而,临床随机化和非随机化之间的关系,在临床随机化和非随机化之间存在一定的差异。这些研究包括:室内运动、室内运动、室内运动、室内运动、室内运动、室内运动、室内运动、室内运动、室内运动。11月11日,唐斯和布莱克的一份名单上列出了一份核实名单。本研究的主要内容是研究过程的特点,包括研究过程的特点、研究过程的修正、研究方法的局限性和方法的重要性。在此基础上,提出了一种新的分类方法。因此,我们没有证据表明,我们有必要对我们的研究成果进行修订,并对我们的研究成果进行修订(我们的研究成果,我们的研究成果)。Considerando作为poucas evidencias disponiveis, nenhuma recomendacao definitiva尤其o exercicio达到com RFS em individuos hipertensos颇得ser abordada devido ao fraco desenho metodologico dos estudos。palavras - have: Treinamento resistdo。Hypertensao。Oclusao血管。对Fluxo Sanguineo进行限制。