Lesioning a connectionist model of visual search: selective effects on distractor grouping.

G. Humphreys, T. A. Freeman, H. J. Muller
{"title":"Lesioning a connectionist model of visual search: selective effects on distractor grouping.","authors":"G. Humphreys, T. A. Freeman, H. J. Muller","doi":"10.1037/H0078815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A connectionist model of visual search is presented, in which search is determined by patterns of grouping between distractors and between the target and the distractors. Grouping is based on conjunctive relations between simple form elements (corners, line-end terminators), and uses principles of similarity and spatial proximity. In its normal, 'unlesioned' state, the model simulates the search data generated by human subjects when they search for simple form conjunctions amongst either homogeneous or heterogeneous distractors (Humphreys & Muller, in press). In this paper, the performance of the model is examined after the model is subject to various types of 'lesion'. 'Lesioning' is produced either by increasing the internal noise on the activation functions governing the interactions between processing units, or by eliminating processing units from different loci in the model. Increasing the internal noise within the model, or lesioning units within 'high-level' processing stages, can generate the selective effects on search found in a detailed single case study of an agnosic patient (Humphreys, Riddoch, Quinlan, Price & Donnelly, this volume): Namely, there is selective disruption of search for a form conjunction amongst homogeneous distractors relative to search for the same target amongst heterogeneous distractors. This selective effect can be attributed to the 'lesion' disrupting grouping between distractors, which normally facilitates search with homogeneous distractors. The simulations demonstrate that (1) search processes can be disrupted by adding internal noise to search functions, (2) that there can be selective effects on grouping processes, and (3) that these selective effects can be associated with different types of lesion to different stages in the model. The implications of the simulations for understanding visual processing impairments in agnosia are discussed.","PeriodicalId":75671,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of psychology","volume":"11 11 1","pages":"417-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0078815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

A connectionist model of visual search is presented, in which search is determined by patterns of grouping between distractors and between the target and the distractors. Grouping is based on conjunctive relations between simple form elements (corners, line-end terminators), and uses principles of similarity and spatial proximity. In its normal, 'unlesioned' state, the model simulates the search data generated by human subjects when they search for simple form conjunctions amongst either homogeneous or heterogeneous distractors (Humphreys & Muller, in press). In this paper, the performance of the model is examined after the model is subject to various types of 'lesion'. 'Lesioning' is produced either by increasing the internal noise on the activation functions governing the interactions between processing units, or by eliminating processing units from different loci in the model. Increasing the internal noise within the model, or lesioning units within 'high-level' processing stages, can generate the selective effects on search found in a detailed single case study of an agnosic patient (Humphreys, Riddoch, Quinlan, Price & Donnelly, this volume): Namely, there is selective disruption of search for a form conjunction amongst homogeneous distractors relative to search for the same target amongst heterogeneous distractors. This selective effect can be attributed to the 'lesion' disrupting grouping between distractors, which normally facilitates search with homogeneous distractors. The simulations demonstrate that (1) search processes can be disrupted by adding internal noise to search functions, (2) that there can be selective effects on grouping processes, and (3) that these selective effects can be associated with different types of lesion to different stages in the model. The implications of the simulations for understanding visual processing impairments in agnosia are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉搜索联结主义模型的损伤:干扰物分组的选择效应。
提出了一种视觉搜索的联结主义模型,该模型中搜索是由干扰物之间和目标与干扰物之间的分组模式决定的。分组基于简单形式元素(角、线结束符)之间的连接关系,并使用相似和空间接近原则。在正常的“未损伤”状态下,该模型模拟人类受试者在同质或异质干扰物中搜索简单形式连词时产生的搜索数据(Humphreys & Muller, In press)。在本文中,在模型受到各种类型的“损伤”后,对模型的性能进行了检验。“损伤”是通过增加控制处理单元之间相互作用的激活函数的内部噪声,或通过消除模型中不同位点的处理单元而产生的。增加模型内的内部噪声,或在“高级”处理阶段的损伤单元,可以对搜索产生选择性影响,这是在一个失读症患者的详细的单个案例研究中发现的(Humphreys, Riddoch, Quinlan, Price & Donnelly,本册):即,相对于在异质干扰物中搜索相同目标,在同质干扰物中搜索形式连接存在选择性中断。这种选择性效应可归因于“损伤”干扰物之间的分组,这通常有助于使用同质干扰物进行搜索。仿真结果表明:(1)在搜索函数中加入内部噪声会干扰搜索过程;(2)在分组过程中存在选择性效应;(3)这些选择性效应与模型中不同阶段的不同类型病变有关。讨论了模拟对理解失认症的视觉加工障碍的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La langue et les Lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception. Neural and behavioural effects of domoic acid, an amnesic shellfish toxin, in the rat. Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. Eye movements and scene perception. Parallel pattern processing and visual agnosia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1