ISSUES OF SCIENTIFIC PRIORITY AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF TWO PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126
A. M. Krivchikov
{"title":"ISSUES OF SCIENTIFIC PRIORITY AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF TWO PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE","authors":"A. M. Krivchikov","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores 2 opposite approaches to the authorship of the special theory of relativity. The first assumes that Albert Einstein is the only scientist whose contribution to the development of science allowed the creation of SRT. The second approach proclaims that the theory of relativity is the product of the collective activity of many scientists who have been working on its creation for decades.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores 2 opposite approaches to the authorship of the special theory of relativity. The first assumes that Albert Einstein is the only scientist whose contribution to the development of science allowed the creation of SRT. The second approach proclaims that the theory of relativity is the product of the collective activity of many scientists who have been working on its creation for decades.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在科学知识的两种哲学概念背景下的科学优先问题
本文探讨了狭义相对论的两种相反的作者身份。第一种假设是,阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦是唯一一个为科学发展做出贡献、允许创建SRT的科学家。第二种观点宣称,相对论是许多科学家几十年来共同努力的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Idol Or Icon? Francisco Suárez And The Concept Of Being Art and Politics in Roger Scruton’s Conservative Philosophy by Ferenc HÖRCHER (review) Transcendental Phenomenology as Human Possibility: Husserl and Fink on the Phenomenologizing Subject by Denis DŽANIĆ (review) From Death to Life: Key Themes in Plato’s Phaedo by Franco TRABATTONI (review) Matter and Mathematics: An Essentialist Account of the Laws of Nature by Andrew YOUNAN (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1