Graduate Engineering Students Changing Labs Due to Experiences of Bias

M. Bahnson, M. Wyer, C. Cass, Adam Kirn
{"title":"Graduate Engineering Students Changing Labs Due to Experiences of Bias","authors":"M. Bahnson, M. Wyer, C. Cass, Adam Kirn","doi":"10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This WIP research paper describes the experiences of engineering graduate students (EGSs) who changed labs following experiences of bias in graduate engineering education. Experiences of bias may contribute to EGS leaving the field of engineering. As part of a larger multiphase research project to explore the influence of bias on EGS engineering identity (EI), qualitative interviews (n = 30) were conducted exploring EGSs’ experiences of bias. These interviews engaged participants in discussions about their social and personal identities (e.g., sex, race/ethnicity) and explored their perceptions of and experiences with bias. This study focuses on four participants who discussed changing research labs in response to experiences of bias. This paper describes data from these participants as it relates to their experiences of bias, lab change, and differences in their new labs, highlighting the nature of bias experiences and their pervasive effects. Participants described experiences of bias leading them to change their research lab. They reported experiences with advisors, peers, and other faculty that made them feel unwelcome in engineering as a field due to their race or gender. Feelings of not belonging in a lab led this sample of EGS to change labs in an attempt to remain in engineering while removing themselves from negative experiences. We argue that institutions should provide opportunities, understanding, and guidance for students to change labs, and briefly discuss how this might be accomplished. Overall, we offer a perspective that has not been explored in the engineering education literature – specifically, changing labs as an alternative to dropping out or leaving the field in response to experiences of bias.","PeriodicalId":6700,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"89 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This WIP research paper describes the experiences of engineering graduate students (EGSs) who changed labs following experiences of bias in graduate engineering education. Experiences of bias may contribute to EGS leaving the field of engineering. As part of a larger multiphase research project to explore the influence of bias on EGS engineering identity (EI), qualitative interviews (n = 30) were conducted exploring EGSs’ experiences of bias. These interviews engaged participants in discussions about their social and personal identities (e.g., sex, race/ethnicity) and explored their perceptions of and experiences with bias. This study focuses on four participants who discussed changing research labs in response to experiences of bias. This paper describes data from these participants as it relates to their experiences of bias, lab change, and differences in their new labs, highlighting the nature of bias experiences and their pervasive effects. Participants described experiences of bias leading them to change their research lab. They reported experiences with advisors, peers, and other faculty that made them feel unwelcome in engineering as a field due to their race or gender. Feelings of not belonging in a lab led this sample of EGS to change labs in an attempt to remain in engineering while removing themselves from negative experiences. We argue that institutions should provide opportunities, understanding, and guidance for students to change labs, and briefly discuss how this might be accomplished. Overall, we offer a perspective that has not been explored in the engineering education literature – specifically, changing labs as an alternative to dropping out or leaving the field in response to experiences of bias.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因偏见经历而换实验室的工程研究生
这篇WIP研究论文描述了工程研究生(EGSs)在经历了研究生工程教育的偏见之后换了实验室的经历。有偏见的经历可能会导致EGS离开工程领域。作为一个更大的多阶段研究项目的一部分,探讨偏见对EGS工程身份(EI)的影响,进行了定性访谈(n = 30),探讨EGS的偏见经历。这些访谈让参与者讨论他们的社会和个人身份(例如,性别、种族/民族),并探讨他们对偏见的看法和经历。这项研究的重点是四位参与者,他们讨论了改变研究实验室以应对偏见的经历。本文描述了这些参与者的数据,因为它与他们的偏见经历、实验室变化和新实验室的差异有关,突出了偏见经历的本质及其普遍影响。参与者描述了导致他们改变研究实验室的偏见经历。他们报告说,由于他们的种族或性别,他们与顾问、同龄人和其他教员的经历使他们感到在工程领域不受欢迎。不属于实验室的感觉导致这些EGS样本换了实验室,试图留在工程领域,同时消除自己的负面经历。我们认为,机构应该为学生更换实验室提供机会、理解和指导,并简要讨论如何实现这一目标。总的来说,我们提供了一个在工程教育文献中没有被探索过的视角——具体来说,改变实验室作为一种选择,以退出或离开该领域,以应对偏见的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning professional software development skills by contributing to Open Source projects Development of a teaching plan to support learning activities of exploratory test design and execution Practical Strategies to Mentor around Hidden Curriculum Pathways in Engineering Impact on Second Language Writing via an Intelligent Writing Assistant and Metacognitive Training CURUMIM: A Proposal of an Intelligent Tutor System to Teach Trigonometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1