The Twelve-Part Typology of Evaluation Uses

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation Pub Date : 2021-04-15 DOI:10.31244/ZFE.2021.01.05
Evert Oskar Vedung
{"title":"The Twelve-Part Typology of Evaluation Uses","authors":"Evert Oskar Vedung","doi":"10.31244/ZFE.2021.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bringing evaluation insights to use is a mantra among evaluators. Their standard solution is to discern instrumental, conceptual, and legitimizing uses as utilizations of evaluation products and to regard use of evaluation processes as a fourth type essentially different from the previous three. In two fundamental ways, this article is breaking loose from this three-times-one typology of use. One deviation is adding tactical, ritual, and constitutive product uses to the prevailing triad of instrumental, conceptual, and legitimizing uses. Even more fundamental is the second divergence, where all six uses are joined not only to product use but to process use as well. This means that all six types of use will turn up in the form of both product use and process use, leading to a six-times-two pattern instead of the three-times-one-uses-of-evaluation typology. The result is the Twelve-part typology of evaluation uses. After elaborating on the evaluation product-use/evaluation process-use distinction, the paper deliberates on the twelve-part evaluation uses typology in detail and provides practical examples of them all for illumination.","PeriodicalId":41629,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation","volume":"62 1","pages":"101-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31244/ZFE.2021.01.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Bringing evaluation insights to use is a mantra among evaluators. Their standard solution is to discern instrumental, conceptual, and legitimizing uses as utilizations of evaluation products and to regard use of evaluation processes as a fourth type essentially different from the previous three. In two fundamental ways, this article is breaking loose from this three-times-one typology of use. One deviation is adding tactical, ritual, and constitutive product uses to the prevailing triad of instrumental, conceptual, and legitimizing uses. Even more fundamental is the second divergence, where all six uses are joined not only to product use but to process use as well. This means that all six types of use will turn up in the form of both product use and process use, leading to a six-times-two pattern instead of the three-times-one-uses-of-evaluation typology. The result is the Twelve-part typology of evaluation uses. After elaborating on the evaluation product-use/evaluation process-use distinction, the paper deliberates on the twelve-part evaluation uses typology in detail and provides practical examples of them all for illumination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价用途的十二部分类型学
将评估见解付诸实践是评估人员的口头禅。他们的标准解决方案是辨别评估产品的工具性、概念性和合法性用途,并将评估过程的使用视为与前三种本质不同的第四种类型。本文从两个基本方面打破了这种三倍一的使用类型。一种偏差是将战术、仪式和结构性产品的使用添加到主流的工具、概念和合法化使用的三合一中。更根本的是第二种差异,这六种用途不仅与产品用途有关,还与加工用途有关。这意味着所有六种类型的使用都将以产品使用和过程使用的形式出现,从而导致六次两次模式而不是三次一次使用的评估类型。结果是评估使用的十二部分类型。在阐述了评价产品-使用/评价过程-使用的区别之后,本文对评价使用类型的十二个部分进行了详细的探讨,并提供了具体的实例进行说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation
Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Die Kompetenzstelle der Bundesregierung für Evaluierung im Statistischen Bundesamt Meta-Evaluierungen von Projektevaluierungen in der Praxis: Erfahrungen aus der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Terms of Reference Matter – Insights from Evaluations of Finnish Development Cooperation Machtwissen? Evaluation zwischen Evidenz und (Mikro-)Politik. Persönliche Eindrücke zur Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Evaluation e.V. (DeGEval), 14.–16. September 2022 Hybride Lehre an Universitäten – eine Evaluation hybrider Seminare am Beispiel des Kompetenzzentrums Weiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin Saarland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1