Diagnostic accuracy of automated breast ultrasound in comparison with different breast imaging modalities in evaluation of breast lesions

Nouralhuda A. Hassan, Hosneya A Mohamed, M. Helal
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of automated breast ultrasound in comparison with different breast imaging modalities in evaluation of breast lesions","authors":"Nouralhuda A. Hassan, Hosneya A Mohamed, M. Helal","doi":"10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_160_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women worldwide. Aims To assess the diagnostic accuracy of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in comparison with other different breast imaging modalities in evaluation of breast lesions and correlate the findings with the pathology results. Patients and methods A prospective analytical study included 50 breast lesions in 50 patients (age: 32–79 years; mean age: 46.8 years). All patients underwent digital mammography (MX), tomosynthesis, contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM), and then ABUS. The results of ABUS were compared with breast imaging modalities. The findings were correlated with final pathological results, which served as the reference standard. Results Overall, 30% (15/50) of the lesions were histopathologically proven as benign lesions, and 70% (35/50) were malignant. Of the 35 malignant lesions, 33 were detectable by ABUS in comparison with 13 of 15 benign lesions. ABUS showed a diagnostic accuracy of 92%, whereas MX showed 70%, tomosynthesis 82%, and CEDM 96%. ABUS improved the sensitivity to 94.4%, with better positive and negative predictive values (positive predictive value of about 94.3% and negative predictive value of 86.7%) Conclusion ABUS added value as an adjunct in the detection and characterization of indeterminate breast lesions during routine imaging diagnosis compared with MX, tomosynthesis, or CEDM. It is valuable in increased accuracy of BIRADS assessment of lesions, regional extension, and multicentric and multifocal breast lesions.","PeriodicalId":22975,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_160_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women worldwide. Aims To assess the diagnostic accuracy of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in comparison with other different breast imaging modalities in evaluation of breast lesions and correlate the findings with the pathology results. Patients and methods A prospective analytical study included 50 breast lesions in 50 patients (age: 32–79 years; mean age: 46.8 years). All patients underwent digital mammography (MX), tomosynthesis, contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM), and then ABUS. The results of ABUS were compared with breast imaging modalities. The findings were correlated with final pathological results, which served as the reference standard. Results Overall, 30% (15/50) of the lesions were histopathologically proven as benign lesions, and 70% (35/50) were malignant. Of the 35 malignant lesions, 33 were detectable by ABUS in comparison with 13 of 15 benign lesions. ABUS showed a diagnostic accuracy of 92%, whereas MX showed 70%, tomosynthesis 82%, and CEDM 96%. ABUS improved the sensitivity to 94.4%, with better positive and negative predictive values (positive predictive value of about 94.3% and negative predictive value of 86.7%) Conclusion ABUS added value as an adjunct in the detection and characterization of indeterminate breast lesions during routine imaging diagnosis compared with MX, tomosynthesis, or CEDM. It is valuable in increased accuracy of BIRADS assessment of lesions, regional extension, and multicentric and multifocal breast lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动乳腺超声诊断乳腺病变的准确性与不同乳腺成像方式的比较
乳腺癌是世界范围内女性最常见的恶性肿瘤。目的比较自动乳腺超声(ABUS)与其他乳腺影像学检查方式对乳腺病变的诊断准确性,并将其与病理结果进行比较。患者和方法一项前瞻性分析研究包括50例乳腺病变患者(年龄:32-79岁;平均年龄:46.8岁)。所有患者均行数字乳房x线摄影(MX)、断层合成、对比增强数字乳房x线摄影(CEDM),然后行ABUS。将ABUS结果与乳腺成像方式进行比较。结果与最终病理结果相关,作为参考标准。结果总体而言,30%(15/50)的组织病理学证实为良性病变,70%(35/50)为恶性病变。在35个恶性病变中,33个被ABUS检测到,而15个良性病变中有13个被ABUS检测到。ABUS的诊断准确率为92%,MX为70%,tomosynthesis为82%,CEDM为96%。ABUS的敏感性提高到94.4%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值都更好(阳性预测值约为94.3%,阴性预测值约为86.7%)结论与MX、tomosynthesis或CEDM相比,ABUS在常规影像学诊断中对乳腺不确定病变的检测和表征具有附加价值。它在提高BIRADS对病变、区域扩展、多中心和多灶性乳腺病变评估的准确性方面具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of nanofat injection in postburn and post-traumatic facial scars Immunological markers changes in pediatric immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Minimally invasive strabismus surgery versus paralimbal approach for horizontal strabismus surgery Clinical applications of brain diffusion-tensor imaging and fiber tractography Choroidal and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses in smokers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1