Maxillary Transverse Dimensions in Subjects with Impacted Canine Compared with Normal Subjects using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Shady Elhamshary, W. Refaat, A. Ramadan
{"title":"Maxillary Transverse Dimensions in Subjects with Impacted Canine Compared with Normal Subjects using Cone Beam Computed Tomography","authors":"Shady Elhamshary, W. Refaat, A. Ramadan","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2023.148976.1132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: One of the many causes of maxillary canine impaction is the mechanical obstruction by a small maxillary arch. By introducing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to the orthodontic field, studying such a relation became possible and accurate. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the maxillary transverse dimensions between subjects with impacted maxillary canines and normal subjects using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 60 adults were acquired. They were grouped into three groups of 20 each: buccal canine impaction, Palatal canine impaction and a control group. The width of the maxilla was measured skeletally, dentally and alveolar in each group using Dolphin software program. Results: the skeletal width of the maxilla was similar among study groups and control ones. It was found that there was a statistically significant difference between canine impaction groups and control group regarding the premolar width and the premolar alveolar width. As for the molar width and the molar alveolar width, there was no statistically significant difference between them. Conclusion: Premolar dental and alveolar widths of the maxillary arch were significantly smaller in palatal canine impaction subjects than in subjects with buccal impactions or normal subjects. Skeletal, molar dental and molar alveolar widths of maxilla had non-significant difference between canine impaction and normal subjects.","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2023.148976.1132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: One of the many causes of maxillary canine impaction is the mechanical obstruction by a small maxillary arch. By introducing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to the orthodontic field, studying such a relation became possible and accurate. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the maxillary transverse dimensions between subjects with impacted maxillary canines and normal subjects using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 60 adults were acquired. They were grouped into three groups of 20 each: buccal canine impaction, Palatal canine impaction and a control group. The width of the maxilla was measured skeletally, dentally and alveolar in each group using Dolphin software program. Results: the skeletal width of the maxilla was similar among study groups and control ones. It was found that there was a statistically significant difference between canine impaction groups and control group regarding the premolar width and the premolar alveolar width. As for the molar width and the molar alveolar width, there was no statistically significant difference between them. Conclusion: Premolar dental and alveolar widths of the maxillary arch were significantly smaller in palatal canine impaction subjects than in subjects with buccal impactions or normal subjects. Skeletal, molar dental and molar alveolar widths of maxilla had non-significant difference between canine impaction and normal subjects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锥形束计算机断层扫描对患阻生犬齿者与正常人上颌横向尺寸的比较
上颌牙嵌塞的原因之一是上颌小弓造成的机械阻塞。将锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)引入正畸领域,使研究这种关系成为可能和准确。目的:本研究的目的是利用锥形束计算机断层扫描比较上颌埋伏牙和正常上颌牙的横向尺寸。方法:采集60例成人的锥束计算机断层图像。他们被分成三组,每组20人:口腔嵌塞组、腭嵌塞组和对照组。采用Dolphin软件测量各组上颌骨的骨、牙、牙槽宽度。结果:研究组与对照组的上颌骨骨宽基本一致。结果发现,在前磨牙宽度和前磨牙牙槽宽度方面,嵌塞组与对照组有统计学差异。磨牙宽度和牙槽宽度比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:腭嵌塞组上颌弓前磨牙和牙槽宽度明显小于颊嵌塞组和正常组。上颌骨骨骼宽度、臼齿宽度和臼齿牙槽宽度与正常组无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EFFECT OF GAMMA-RADIATION ON DE- AND RE-MINERALIZATION OF ENAMEL AND DENTIN (An IN-VITRO STUDY) Comparison of Upper and Lower Canine Retraction Rates Assisted by Flapless Laser Corticotomy. Evaluation of Position and Treatment Difficulty of Impacted Maxillary Canine Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study Histological and Molecular Assessment of Anti-inflammatory Effect of Different Concentrations of Hyaluronic Acid Injected in Inflamed Rabbit’s Tempromandibular Joint Effect of Using Two Different Techniques of Denture Base Fabrication on Retention of Maxillary Complete Denture: An in Vivo Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1