Trust in Banks: A Tentative Conceptual Framework

O. Butzbach
{"title":"Trust in Banks: A Tentative Conceptual Framework","authors":"O. Butzbach","doi":"10.3790/SCHM.136.3.303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 2007–08 crisis, banks in many countries have been facing what seems to be a serious “trust crisis.” This sharp decline in trust in banks and banking as well as the near-collapse of banking systems during the crisis is partly captured by a growing empirical literature. However, this literature presents several shortcomings which reflect a more general lack of theorization of trust in banks. This lack of theorization certainly has much to do with the distance between the economic literature on banks and banking and the sociological and economic literature on trust. This paper aims to bridge this gap by proposing a new conceptual framework, building on new institutional theories. In particular, the paper identifies three related dimensions of trust that seem to have relevance for the banking industry: “relational,” “systemic” and “vertical” trust. While mainstream financial intermediation theory and agency theory provide a good understanding of relational trust, they are less well equipped to deal with the other dimensions of trust. The paper, therefore, builds on heterodox theories of money and debt to build a more comprehensive understanding of trust in banks. The proposed conceptual framework implies a new, institutional approach to banking in economic theory.","PeriodicalId":36775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Economics-Schmollers Jahrbuch","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Economics-Schmollers Jahrbuch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/SCHM.136.3.303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Since the 2007–08 crisis, banks in many countries have been facing what seems to be a serious “trust crisis.” This sharp decline in trust in banks and banking as well as the near-collapse of banking systems during the crisis is partly captured by a growing empirical literature. However, this literature presents several shortcomings which reflect a more general lack of theorization of trust in banks. This lack of theorization certainly has much to do with the distance between the economic literature on banks and banking and the sociological and economic literature on trust. This paper aims to bridge this gap by proposing a new conceptual framework, building on new institutional theories. In particular, the paper identifies three related dimensions of trust that seem to have relevance for the banking industry: “relational,” “systemic” and “vertical” trust. While mainstream financial intermediation theory and agency theory provide a good understanding of relational trust, they are less well equipped to deal with the other dimensions of trust. The paper, therefore, builds on heterodox theories of money and debt to build a more comprehensive understanding of trust in banks. The proposed conceptual framework implies a new, institutional approach to banking in economic theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行信任:一个尝试性的概念框架
自2007-08年金融危机以来,许多国家的银行都面临着一场严重的“信任危机”。越来越多的实证文献在一定程度上反映了人们对银行和银行业信任度的急剧下降,以及危机期间银行体系几近崩溃。然而,这篇文献提出了几个缺点,反映了对银行信任更普遍缺乏理论化。这种缺乏理论化的现象,当然与关于银行和银行业的经济学文献与关于信任的社会学和经济学文献之间的距离有很大关系。本文旨在通过在新的制度理论基础上提出一个新的概念框架来弥合这一差距。特别是,本文确定了与银行业相关的信任的三个相关维度:“关系”、“系统”和“垂直”信任。虽然主流的金融中介理论和代理理论对关系信任提供了很好的理解,但它们对处理信任的其他维度的能力较差。因此,本文建立在非正统的货币和债务理论的基础上,以建立对银行信任的更全面的理解。提出的概念框架意味着在经济理论中对银行业采用一种新的、制度性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contextual Economics-Schmollers Jahrbuch
Journal of Contextual Economics-Schmollers Jahrbuch Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foreword to the Translation of Gustav Schmoller’s Reviews of Carl Menger’s “Principles,” “Investigations,” and “Errors” The Legislature of the German Reich Introduction to Special Issue “The Jahrbuch: The First 150 Years” III. Reaction to Carl Menger’s “The Errors of Historicism” The Early Reception of Carl Menger’s Grundsätze: A Bibliographical Note
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1