Risk sharing under the dominant peer‐to‐peer property and casualty insurance business models

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Risk Management and Insurance Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1111/RMIR.12180
M. Denuit, C. Robert
{"title":"Risk sharing under the dominant peer‐to‐peer property and casualty insurance business models","authors":"M. Denuit, C. Robert","doi":"10.1111/RMIR.12180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper purposes to formalize the three business models dominating peer-to-peer (P2P) property and casualty insurance: the self-governing model, the broker model and the carrier model. The former one develops outside the insurance market whereas the latter ones may originate from the insurance industry, by partnering with an existing company or by issuing a new generation of participating insurance policies where part of the risk is shared within a community and higher losses, exceeding the community’s risk-bearing capacity are covered by an insurance or reinsurance company. The present paper proposes an actuarial modeling based on conditional mean risk sharing, to support the development of this new P2P insurance offer under each of the three business models. In addition, several specific questions are also addressed in the self-governing model. Considering an economic agent who has to select the optimal pool for a risk to be shared with other participants, it is shown that uniform comparison of the Lorenz or concentration curves associated to the respective total losses of the pools under consideration allows the agent to decide which pool is preferable. The monotonicity of the respective contributions of the participants is established with respect to the convex order, showing that increasing the number of participants is always beneficial under conditional mean risk sharing.","PeriodicalId":35338,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RMIR.12180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper purposes to formalize the three business models dominating peer-to-peer (P2P) property and casualty insurance: the self-governing model, the broker model and the carrier model. The former one develops outside the insurance market whereas the latter ones may originate from the insurance industry, by partnering with an existing company or by issuing a new generation of participating insurance policies where part of the risk is shared within a community and higher losses, exceeding the community’s risk-bearing capacity are covered by an insurance or reinsurance company. The present paper proposes an actuarial modeling based on conditional mean risk sharing, to support the development of this new P2P insurance offer under each of the three business models. In addition, several specific questions are also addressed in the self-governing model. Considering an economic agent who has to select the optimal pool for a risk to be shared with other participants, it is shown that uniform comparison of the Lorenz or concentration curves associated to the respective total losses of the pools under consideration allows the agent to decide which pool is preferable. The monotonicity of the respective contributions of the participants is established with respect to the convex order, showing that increasing the number of participants is always beneficial under conditional mean risk sharing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
p2p财产和意外伤害保险业务模式下的风险分担
本文旨在形式化点对点(P2P)财产意外保险的三种业务模型:自治模型、代理模型和载体模型。前者是在保险市场之外发展起来的,而后者可能源于保险业,通过与现有公司合作或发行新一代的参保保单,由社区分担部分风险,而超过社区风险承受能力的较高损失则由保险公司或再保险公司承担。本文提出了一个基于条件平均风险分担的精算模型,以支持在三种商业模式下这种新的P2P保险服务的发展。此外,自治模型还解决了几个具体问题。考虑一个经济主体必须选择与其他参与者共享风险的最优池,结果表明,与所考虑的池中各自的总损失相关的洛伦兹曲线或浓度曲线的统一比较使该主体能够决定哪个池更优。建立了参与者各自贡献相对于凸阶的单调性,表明在有条件平均风险分担的情况下,增加参与者数量总是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Insurance Review
Risk Management and Insurance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Insurance Review publishes respected, accessible, and high-quality applied research, and well-reasoned opinion and discussion in the field of risk and insurance. The Review"s "Feature Articles" section includes original research involving applications and applied techniques. The "Perspectives" section contains articles providing new insights on the research literature, business practice, and public policy. The "Educational Insights" section provides a repository of high-caliber model lectures in risk and insurance, along with articles discussing and evaluating instructional techniques.
期刊最新文献
Risk‐based thinking for extreme events: What do terrorism and climate change have in common? Insurance and the public–private management of risk at US commercial nuclear power plants InsurTech in the United States and Germany—What are the drivers behind the different business models? The importance of risk and insurance teaching within the ARIA mission On the correlation of self‐reported and behavioral risk attitude measures: The case of the General Risk Question and the Investment Game following Gneezy and Potters (1997)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1