QUANTIFYING BEDLOAD TRANSPORT IN EPHEMERAL CHANNELS USING SEISMIC METHODS

Loc Luong, D. Cadol, Susan Bilek, J. M. Mclaughlin, J. Laronne
{"title":"QUANTIFYING BEDLOAD TRANSPORT IN EPHEMERAL CHANNELS USING SEISMIC METHODS","authors":"Loc Luong, D. Cadol, Susan Bilek, J. M. Mclaughlin, J. Laronne","doi":"10.1130/abs/2022am-382433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transport of sediment is one of the fundamental geomorphic processes governing the evolution of landscapes. Reliable sediment flux forecasts are necessary for a variety of applications such as sedimentation engineering, river restoration, and flood risk mitigation. Quantifying bedload driven by flood events in ephemeral channels is notoriously difficult because of the scarcity, irregular nature, and high intensity of flash floods. Seismic methods appear to be a promising tool to characterize such fluvial processes, as they continuously record the ground motions caused by bedload and water movement while located outside of the active channel. We evaluated the performance of the physics-based model estimates of bedload fluxes developed by Tsai et al. (2012) by comparison to continuous monitoring of bedload measurements. The model establishes a mathematical relationship for the power spectral density (PSD) of the Rayleigh waves produced by vertically impulsive impacts from saltating particles based on the rate of impacts of fluvial sediment for a given bedload flux and grain size distribution. As a test of this model, we collected seismic data during flow events and compared the seismically-estimated bedload flux with high-precision bedload flux observations. These data derive from a multi-year campaign of monitoring an ephemeral, sand-and-gravel bedded channel reach of the Arroyo de los Pinos, central New Mexico, USA. Based on seismic data analysis, we find that bedload transport correlates to signals in the 30-80 Hz frequency range, whereas rainfall correlates to signals above 100 Hz. Inverting seismic data for bedload fluxes using the vertical impact model results in overestimates of the observed bedload flux by ~2 orders of magnitude. We investigate three hypotheses that may explain this discrepancy. First, the process of rolling and/or sliding particles, as opposed to saltating particles, may be the predominant cause of model discrepancy. Rolling particles are perhaps a very significant contributor to bedload at this study site. Second, the fine-grained alluvial characteristics of this riverbed, as contrasted to a rigid bedrock substratum used in the model, lead to significant attenuation of seismic energy as a result of the inelastic impact of bedload particles. Third, the bedload impact frequency model may not fully depict the impact of particles onto the riverbed in this environment. By thoroughly examining bedload transport mechanisms and considering alternative impulse functions for seismic noise generation, we intend to construct a new physics-based model within the framework of the existing models to quantify bedload transport in the ephemeral environment.","PeriodicalId":12535,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2022am-382433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transport of sediment is one of the fundamental geomorphic processes governing the evolution of landscapes. Reliable sediment flux forecasts are necessary for a variety of applications such as sedimentation engineering, river restoration, and flood risk mitigation. Quantifying bedload driven by flood events in ephemeral channels is notoriously difficult because of the scarcity, irregular nature, and high intensity of flash floods. Seismic methods appear to be a promising tool to characterize such fluvial processes, as they continuously record the ground motions caused by bedload and water movement while located outside of the active channel. We evaluated the performance of the physics-based model estimates of bedload fluxes developed by Tsai et al. (2012) by comparison to continuous monitoring of bedload measurements. The model establishes a mathematical relationship for the power spectral density (PSD) of the Rayleigh waves produced by vertically impulsive impacts from saltating particles based on the rate of impacts of fluvial sediment for a given bedload flux and grain size distribution. As a test of this model, we collected seismic data during flow events and compared the seismically-estimated bedload flux with high-precision bedload flux observations. These data derive from a multi-year campaign of monitoring an ephemeral, sand-and-gravel bedded channel reach of the Arroyo de los Pinos, central New Mexico, USA. Based on seismic data analysis, we find that bedload transport correlates to signals in the 30-80 Hz frequency range, whereas rainfall correlates to signals above 100 Hz. Inverting seismic data for bedload fluxes using the vertical impact model results in overestimates of the observed bedload flux by ~2 orders of magnitude. We investigate three hypotheses that may explain this discrepancy. First, the process of rolling and/or sliding particles, as opposed to saltating particles, may be the predominant cause of model discrepancy. Rolling particles are perhaps a very significant contributor to bedload at this study site. Second, the fine-grained alluvial characteristics of this riverbed, as contrasted to a rigid bedrock substratum used in the model, lead to significant attenuation of seismic energy as a result of the inelastic impact of bedload particles. Third, the bedload impact frequency model may not fully depict the impact of particles onto the riverbed in this environment. By thoroughly examining bedload transport mechanisms and considering alternative impulse functions for seismic noise generation, we intend to construct a new physics-based model within the framework of the existing models to quantify bedload transport in the ephemeral environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用地震方法量化短暂河道中的河床输运
泥沙的搬运是控制地貌演化的基本地貌过程之一。可靠的泥沙通量预测对于泥沙工程、河流修复和洪水风险降低等各种应用都是必要的。由于洪水的稀缺性、不规则性和高强度,对短暂河道中由洪水事件驱动的河床荷载进行量化是出了名的困难。地震方法似乎是表征此类河流过程的一种很有前途的工具,因为它们可以连续记录由活跃河道外的层载和水运动引起的地面运动。我们评估了Tsai等人(2012)开发的基于物理的河床通量模型估计的性能,并将其与连续监测的河床通量测量结果进行了比较。该模型建立了在给定的河床通量和粒度分布条件下,基于河流沉积物的冲击速率,由跃变颗粒垂直冲击产生的瑞利波功率谱密度(PSD)的数学关系。为了验证这一模型,我们收集了流事件期间的地震数据,并将地震估计的床上负荷通量与高精度床上负荷通量观测结果进行了比较。这些数据来自对美国新墨西哥州中部阿罗约德洛斯皮诺斯一条短暂的沙砾层状河道的多年监测。通过对地震资料的分析,发现30 ~ 80 Hz频率范围内的床载运移与信号相关,而100 Hz以上的信号与降雨相关。利用垂直冲击模型反演地震资料得到的层载通量结果是对观测到的层载通量高估了约2个数量级。我们研究了三个可能解释这种差异的假设。首先,与弹跳粒子相反,滚动和/或滑动粒子的过程可能是模型差异的主要原因。滚动颗粒可能是本研究地点的床上负荷的一个非常重要的贡献者。其次,与模型中使用的刚性基岩基质相比,该河床的细粒度冲积特征导致了由于层载颗粒的非弹性冲击而导致的地震能量的显著衰减。第三,在这种环境下,质粒冲击频率模型可能不能完全描述颗粒对河床的冲击。通过深入研究床质输运机制,并考虑地震噪声产生的替代脉冲函数,我们打算在现有模型的框架内构建一个新的基于物理的模型,以量化短暂环境中的床质输运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CONSTRAINING REDUCING CONDITIONS IN THE PRAGUE BASIN DURING THE LATE SILURIAN LAU/KOZLOWSKII EXTINCTION EVENT PALEOGEOGRAPHY AND HIGH-PRECISION GEOCHRONOLOGY OF THE NEOARCHEAN FORTESCUE GROUP, PILBARA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA THERE AND BACK AGAIN: RECYCLING OF THE APPALACHIAN SIGNATURE IN DZ U-PB RECORDS OF PHANEROZOIC NORTH AMERICA EXAMINING THE ONTOGENY OF THE PENNSYLVANIAN CLADID CRINOID ERISOCRINUS “REEF SURVIVOR” – A NEW BOARD GAME DESIGNED TO TEACH COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS ABOUT REEF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND EXTINCTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1