Morning report decreases length of stay in emergency general surgery patients

J. Gardner, J. Wolfe, W. Beck, K. Sexton, A. Bhavaraju, B. Davis, M. Kimbrough, H. Jensen, R. Robertson, R. Reif, Saleema A. Karim, John R Taylor
{"title":"Morning report decreases length of stay in emergency general surgery patients","authors":"J. Gardner, J. Wolfe, W. Beck, K. Sexton, A. Bhavaraju, B. Davis, M. Kimbrough, H. Jensen, R. Robertson, R. Reif, Saleema A. Karim, John R Taylor","doi":"10.5430/jha.v8n6p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Communication in the hospital setting is an easy target for quality improvement. Capturing this change via communication between providers during hand-offs is necessary to reduce delays and errors. While this process has been more widely characterized in medical specialties, we designed this study to address the knowledge gap in surgical specialties.Methods: Our institution’s division of Acute Care Surgery (ACS) implemented Morning Report (MR) in October of 2015. At MR, all admissions and service transfers were discussed from Trauma, Emergency General Surgery (EGS), and Surgical Critical Care services from the previous 24 hours. This study compared patients who underwent a surgical procedure during their hospital stay before and after protocol implementation.Results: 974 patients were included in this study. The average patient was 50.3 years of age, 65.4% were white, and 51.7% were male. The average length of stay (LOS) was 8.3 days with 1.75 days to procedure. The post-MR cohort LOS was 2.7 shorter and had 0.85 fewer days to procedure. In an adjusted regression analysis, days to procedure and LOS decreased by 33% (p < .01) and 17% (p < .01) respectively.Conclusions: Implementation of MR led to a decrease in the overall LOS and days to procedure for operative patients. Our results advocate for the standard use of structured hand-offs in surgical units.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v8n6p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Communication in the hospital setting is an easy target for quality improvement. Capturing this change via communication between providers during hand-offs is necessary to reduce delays and errors. While this process has been more widely characterized in medical specialties, we designed this study to address the knowledge gap in surgical specialties.Methods: Our institution’s division of Acute Care Surgery (ACS) implemented Morning Report (MR) in October of 2015. At MR, all admissions and service transfers were discussed from Trauma, Emergency General Surgery (EGS), and Surgical Critical Care services from the previous 24 hours. This study compared patients who underwent a surgical procedure during their hospital stay before and after protocol implementation.Results: 974 patients were included in this study. The average patient was 50.3 years of age, 65.4% were white, and 51.7% were male. The average length of stay (LOS) was 8.3 days with 1.75 days to procedure. The post-MR cohort LOS was 2.7 shorter and had 0.85 fewer days to procedure. In an adjusted regression analysis, days to procedure and LOS decreased by 33% (p < .01) and 17% (p < .01) respectively.Conclusions: Implementation of MR led to a decrease in the overall LOS and days to procedure for operative patients. Our results advocate for the standard use of structured hand-offs in surgical units.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晨报减少急诊普通外科病人的住院时间
目的:医院环境中的沟通是一个容易提高质量的目标。为了减少延迟和错误,必须在移交期间通过提供者之间的通信捕获此更改。虽然这一过程在医学专业中更为普遍,但我们设计了这项研究来解决外科专业的知识差距。方法:我院急症外科(ACS)于2015年10月实施晨报(MR)。在MR,所有入院和服务转移都是从过去24小时的创伤、紧急普通外科(EGS)和外科重症监护服务中进行讨论的。这项研究比较了在协议实施前后住院期间接受外科手术的患者。结果:974例患者纳入本研究。患者平均年龄50.3岁,白人65.4%,男性51.7%。平均住院时间(LOS)为8.3天,其中1.75天需要办理手续。mr后队列的LOS缩短了2.7天,手术时间缩短了0.85天。在调整后的回归分析中,手术天数和LOS分别减少了33% (p < 0.01)和17% (p < 0.01)。结论:MR的实施减少了手术患者的总LOS和手术时间。我们的结果提倡在外科单位中标准使用有组织的交接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The reality of patient bodily waste management: Nurse perceptions of current practice & staff safety Facilitators and barriers for high-reliability training in medical centers Quality of care and emergency department throughput during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community health system Pandemic in a Community Health System Comparison of nursing staffing ratio in selected safety net and non-safety net hospitals in the United States Challenges and opportunities in achieving secure hospital clinical mobility management: An illustrative use case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1