Effect of Size Classification on Physical and Physiological Quality Aimed at Pelletizing Seeds of Eucalyptus Species

IF 0.5 Q4 FORESTRY Floresta e Ambiente Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2179-8087-FLORAM-2020-0092
T. S. Jeromini, G. Silva, C. C. Martins
{"title":"Effect of Size Classification on Physical and Physiological Quality Aimed at Pelletizing Seeds of Eucalyptus Species","authors":"T. S. Jeromini, G. Silva, C. C. Martins","doi":"10.1590/2179-8087-FLORAM-2020-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work was to verify the effect of size classification on the physical and physiological quality of Eucalyptus spp. seeds to optimize the selection for covering. The seeds were separated in sieves with six size classes: 850, 710, 600, 500, 425 μm, and a non-perforated bottom (< 425 μm). Were evaluated the sieve retention, purity, weight of a thousand seeds, germination, and first count of germination. Sieve classification is effective for the separation of materials according to the best physical and physiological qualities. E. grandis seeds from the 710 μm sieve, E. robusta from the 850 μm sieve, and E. urophylla from the 710 and 850 μm sieves can be selected for covering, as they present maximum physical and physiological quality. For the three species, the smallest materials, retained in the 500, 425, and bottom <425μm sieves, must be discarded due to low purity and germination potential.","PeriodicalId":46895,"journal":{"name":"Floresta e Ambiente","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Floresta e Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087-FLORAM-2020-0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work was to verify the effect of size classification on the physical and physiological quality of Eucalyptus spp. seeds to optimize the selection for covering. The seeds were separated in sieves with six size classes: 850, 710, 600, 500, 425 μm, and a non-perforated bottom (< 425 μm). Were evaluated the sieve retention, purity, weight of a thousand seeds, germination, and first count of germination. Sieve classification is effective for the separation of materials according to the best physical and physiological qualities. E. grandis seeds from the 710 μm sieve, E. robusta from the 850 μm sieve, and E. urophylla from the 710 and 850 μm sieves can be selected for covering, as they present maximum physical and physiological quality. For the three species, the smallest materials, retained in the 500, 425, and bottom <425μm sieves, must be discarded due to low purity and germination potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大小分级对桉树造粒种子物理生理品质的影响
本研究旨在验证桉树种子大小分级对其物理生理品质的影响,以优化覆盖方式的选择。种子在六种尺寸的筛子中分离:850、710、600、500、425 μm和无孔底部(< 425 μm)。评估筛留率、纯度、千粒重、发芽率和第一次发芽率。筛分是根据最佳的物理和生理品质对物料进行分离的有效方法。710 μm筛下的大叶豆种子、850 μm筛下的罗布斯塔种子、710 μm和850 μm筛下的尾叶种子均可选择覆盖,因为它们的物理和生理品质最好。对于这三个品种,保留在500、425和底部<425μm筛子中的最小物料,由于纯度和发芽潜力低,必须丢弃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quality of Lecythis tuyrana Pittier Seedlings Using Controlled-Release Fertilizer, Volumes of Container and Light Acclimatation Temporal Analysis of Forest Fragmentation in the Amazon Rainforest of Tocantins State, Brazil Selecting Native Species for Soil and Water Bioengineering Techniques: Alternative to Restore Areas in Brumadinho, MG, Brazil Mobilization of Storage Reserves in Dalbergia spruceana Benth. (Fabaceae) Seeds During Germination at Different Temperatures Between Caatinga and Atlantic Forest: Floristic Composition in a Transition Area in Northeast Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1