The Confirming Evidence for Ictal Epileptic Headache

P. Parisi, V. Belcastro, P. Striano
{"title":"The Confirming Evidence for Ictal Epileptic Headache","authors":"P. Parisi, V. Belcastro, P. Striano","doi":"10.1111/head.13678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dr. Fanella et al published in Headache, a possible additional case of “Ictal Epileptic Headache” (IEH), that they classified as a “non convulsive status epilepticus.” They reported a woman experiencing migraine attacks-featuring prolonged, intense, throbbing, left temporal pain associated with ipsilateral visual symptoms (ie, non-colored flashes and photophobia) and nausea or vomiting, unresponsive to painkillers – associated with epileptic activity over the right posterior cerebral regions and responsive to intravenous lacosamide. The first description of a documented isolated headache as a sole ictal manifestation of an epileptic seizure (erroneously reported by Dr. Fanella et al, as first published in 2011) was described and published in Epilepsia in 2007 by Parisi et al. These authors coined and published the “original criteria” for IEH diagnosis in 2012, although they have not yet been recognized by the International League Against Epilepsy classification. Indeed, IEH criteria should be applied to all cases where headache is the sole, or is the earliest and most evident feature, of a seizure, regardless of other possible “subtle” associated manifestations; in fact, the same authors have suggested that, to enable a IEH diagnosis, a careful and detailed neurologic exam must be carried, to rule out other associated ictal signs and symptoms. In particular, the availability of an ictal video-EEG recording confirming the clinical suspect of a headache of epileptic origin as well as the prompt response to anti-seizure therapy is of paramount importance in such cases, which may be challenging even for the most expert of clinicians. Fanella and colleagues’ description confirms that (video)-EEG recording – not routinely recommended in patients with headache – should be considered promptly in individuals reporting prolonged migraine/headache not responsive to analgesics. Moreover, ictal EEG recording does also allow the clinician to differentiate IEH from the misleading “migralepsy” concept that probably does not exist at all (ie, “an isolated ictal headache, immediately followed by other epileptic manifestation”). The pathophysiology of IEH is still a matter of on-going research. Although there is not a specific cortical substrate, the most frequently reported origin of IEH is in the posterior cerebral areas, particularly the occipital lobe, as it is a vulnerable region for the onset of both seizures and headache. Notably, 10 years before the epilepsy onset, the patient reported by Dr. Fanella et al had been hospitalized for eclampsia, followed by focal seizures and prolonged coma. Her brain MRI revealed right parietal-occipital ischemic damage. This clinical and neuroimaging picture is strongly suggestive of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, a usually reversible condition that can sometimes result in death or irreversible neurological deficit, including chronic epilepsy. Therefore, it is likely that the cortical projections of headache pain are widespread projections that involve significantly the autonomic networks (insula, cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and other parts of the limbic system) rather than just the primary sensory-sensitive areas, thus supporting the view that IEH is primarily an “autonomic” rather than a “painful” epileptic seizure.","PeriodicalId":12845,"journal":{"name":"Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dr. Fanella et al published in Headache, a possible additional case of “Ictal Epileptic Headache” (IEH), that they classified as a “non convulsive status epilepticus.” They reported a woman experiencing migraine attacks-featuring prolonged, intense, throbbing, left temporal pain associated with ipsilateral visual symptoms (ie, non-colored flashes and photophobia) and nausea or vomiting, unresponsive to painkillers – associated with epileptic activity over the right posterior cerebral regions and responsive to intravenous lacosamide. The first description of a documented isolated headache as a sole ictal manifestation of an epileptic seizure (erroneously reported by Dr. Fanella et al, as first published in 2011) was described and published in Epilepsia in 2007 by Parisi et al. These authors coined and published the “original criteria” for IEH diagnosis in 2012, although they have not yet been recognized by the International League Against Epilepsy classification. Indeed, IEH criteria should be applied to all cases where headache is the sole, or is the earliest and most evident feature, of a seizure, regardless of other possible “subtle” associated manifestations; in fact, the same authors have suggested that, to enable a IEH diagnosis, a careful and detailed neurologic exam must be carried, to rule out other associated ictal signs and symptoms. In particular, the availability of an ictal video-EEG recording confirming the clinical suspect of a headache of epileptic origin as well as the prompt response to anti-seizure therapy is of paramount importance in such cases, which may be challenging even for the most expert of clinicians. Fanella and colleagues’ description confirms that (video)-EEG recording – not routinely recommended in patients with headache – should be considered promptly in individuals reporting prolonged migraine/headache not responsive to analgesics. Moreover, ictal EEG recording does also allow the clinician to differentiate IEH from the misleading “migralepsy” concept that probably does not exist at all (ie, “an isolated ictal headache, immediately followed by other epileptic manifestation”). The pathophysiology of IEH is still a matter of on-going research. Although there is not a specific cortical substrate, the most frequently reported origin of IEH is in the posterior cerebral areas, particularly the occipital lobe, as it is a vulnerable region for the onset of both seizures and headache. Notably, 10 years before the epilepsy onset, the patient reported by Dr. Fanella et al had been hospitalized for eclampsia, followed by focal seizures and prolonged coma. Her brain MRI revealed right parietal-occipital ischemic damage. This clinical and neuroimaging picture is strongly suggestive of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, a usually reversible condition that can sometimes result in death or irreversible neurological deficit, including chronic epilepsy. Therefore, it is likely that the cortical projections of headache pain are widespread projections that involve significantly the autonomic networks (insula, cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and other parts of the limbic system) rather than just the primary sensory-sensitive areas, thus supporting the view that IEH is primarily an “autonomic” rather than a “painful” epileptic seizure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫发作性头痛的确证证据
Fanella博士等人在《头痛》杂志上发表了一篇文章,这可能是“癫痫性头痛”(IEH)的另一个病例,他们将其归类为“非惊厥性癫痫持续状态”。他们报告了一名女性偏头痛发作,其特征是与同侧视觉症状(即无颜色闪光和畏光)和恶心或呕吐相关的长时间、剧烈、悸动的左颞痛,对止痛药无反应,与右侧脑后区域的癫痫活动有关,并对静脉注射拉科沙胺有反应。Parisi等人于2007年在《癫痫》杂志上首次描述并发表了记录在案的孤立性头痛作为癫痫发作的唯一症状表现(由Fanella博士等人于2011年首次发表的错误报告)。这些作者在2012年创造并发表了IEH诊断的“原始标准”,尽管这些标准尚未得到国际抗癫痫联盟分类的认可。事实上,IEH标准应适用于所有头痛是癫痫发作的唯一或最早和最明显特征的病例,而不考虑其他可能的“细微”相关表现;事实上,这几位作者还建议,为了进行IEH诊断,必须进行仔细和详细的神经系统检查,以排除其他相关的生命体征和症状。特别是,在这种情况下,确认癫痫性头痛的临床怀疑以及抗癫痫治疗的迅速反应的关键视频脑电图记录的可用性是至关重要的,即使对最专业的临床医生来说,这也可能是具有挑战性的。Fanella和他的同事的描述证实了(视频)-脑电图记录-不常规推荐用于头痛患者-应该立即考虑在报告对止痛药无反应的长期偏头痛/头痛的个人。此外,发作性脑电图记录也允许临床医生区分IEH与可能根本不存在的误导性“偏头痛”概念(即“孤立的发作性头痛,紧接着出现其他癫痫表现”)。IEH的病理生理学仍然是一个正在进行的研究。虽然没有特定的皮质底物,但最常报道的IEH起源于大脑后部区域,特别是枕叶,因为它是癫痫发作和头痛的易感区域。值得注意的是,在癫痫发作前10年,Fanella博士等人报道的患者曾因子痫住院,随后出现局灶性癫痫发作和长时间昏迷。她的脑部核磁共振显示右侧顶叶-枕叶缺血性损伤。该临床和神经影像学图像强烈提示后路可逆性脑病综合征,这是一种通常可逆的疾病,有时可导致死亡或不可逆的神经功能缺损,包括慢性癫痫。因此,头痛的皮质投射很可能是广泛的投射,显著涉及自主神经网络(脑岛、扣带皮层、前额叶皮层、杏仁核和边缘系统的其他部分),而不仅仅是主要的感觉敏感区域,从而支持IEH主要是“自主神经”而不是“痛苦”癫痫发作的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
American Headache Society 66th Annual Scientific Meeting June 13–16, 2024 San Diego, California A multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zolmitriptan nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine in patients aged 6 to 11 years, with an open‐label extension Narrative review of peripheral nerve blocks for the management of headache The 15‐day threshold in the definition of chronic migraine is reasonable and sufficient—Five reasons for not changing the ICHD‐3 definition Migraine with aura associates with a higher artificial intelligence: ECG atrial fibrillation prediction model output compared to migraine without aura in both women and men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1