Fluid City: River Gods in Rome and Contested Topography

Q4 Arts and Humanities Scripta Mediaevalia Pub Date : 2016-08-24 DOI:10.1353/MDI.2016.0012
Charles A. Burroughs
{"title":"Fluid City: River Gods in Rome and Contested Topography","authors":"Charles A. Burroughs","doi":"10.1353/MDI.2016.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few major cities have undergone so thorough a transformation as early modern Rome, where a shrunken “gigantic cadaver” became a paradigmatic early modern theater of architectural magnificence, worthy of its ancient predecessor. No single site better exemplifies this transformation than the Campidoglio, the ancient Capitoline Hill, surmounted by a grand piazza bordered on three sides by palaces but open to the city on the fourth side where St. Peter’s dome, designed by Michelangelo for Pope Paul III (r. 1534–49), rises above the distant skyline. The same architect and patron played key roles in the sixteenth-century remodeling of the Campidoglio (Fig. 1), though the only building actually erected on the hill by the pope was not part of Michelangelo’s Capitoline ensemble. Early in his long pontificate, Paul saw to the construction of the Torre Farnese (or Paolina), a fortified residence designed with an eye to defense and domination, certainly not aesthetics. Until its demolition to make way for the Victor Emmanuel Monument (1885), the Torre Farnese was a looming presence on the hill, overlooking a city where by now numerous palaces exemplified the classicizing, formal language of the Renaissance, of which it showed hardly a trace. Nor could there be a stronger contrast with Michelangelo’s highly innovative and allusive designs for the civic palaces on the Campidoglio, though these were not realized until long after Paul’s death (the date of the design is a different issue, as noted below), or indeed with the same architect’s work, from 1546, on Paul’s own family palace, the Palazzo Farnese. It has recently been suggested that we should see the rustic character of the Torre Farnese, traditionally sometimes referred to as a villa, in a more positive light, and as","PeriodicalId":36685,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Mediaevalia","volume":"5 1","pages":"187 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MDI.2016.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few major cities have undergone so thorough a transformation as early modern Rome, where a shrunken “gigantic cadaver” became a paradigmatic early modern theater of architectural magnificence, worthy of its ancient predecessor. No single site better exemplifies this transformation than the Campidoglio, the ancient Capitoline Hill, surmounted by a grand piazza bordered on three sides by palaces but open to the city on the fourth side where St. Peter’s dome, designed by Michelangelo for Pope Paul III (r. 1534–49), rises above the distant skyline. The same architect and patron played key roles in the sixteenth-century remodeling of the Campidoglio (Fig. 1), though the only building actually erected on the hill by the pope was not part of Michelangelo’s Capitoline ensemble. Early in his long pontificate, Paul saw to the construction of the Torre Farnese (or Paolina), a fortified residence designed with an eye to defense and domination, certainly not aesthetics. Until its demolition to make way for the Victor Emmanuel Monument (1885), the Torre Farnese was a looming presence on the hill, overlooking a city where by now numerous palaces exemplified the classicizing, formal language of the Renaissance, of which it showed hardly a trace. Nor could there be a stronger contrast with Michelangelo’s highly innovative and allusive designs for the civic palaces on the Campidoglio, though these were not realized until long after Paul’s death (the date of the design is a different issue, as noted below), or indeed with the same architect’s work, from 1546, on Paul’s own family palace, the Palazzo Farnese. It has recently been suggested that we should see the rustic character of the Torre Farnese, traditionally sometimes referred to as a villa, in a more positive light, and as
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流动的城市:罗马的河神和有争议的地形
很少有大城市像近代早期的罗马那样经历了如此彻底的转变,在那里,一个缩小了的“巨大的尸体”变成了一个典型的建筑宏伟的早期现代剧院,不逊于它的古代前身。坎皮多里奥(Campidoglio)是最能体现这种转变的地方。坎皮多里奥是古老的卡比托利欧山(Capitoline Hill),山顶上有一个大广场,三面是宫殿,四面面向城市,圣彼得大教堂的圆顶由米开朗基罗(Michelangelo)为教皇保罗三世(Pope Paul III, 1534-49年)设计,高耸在远处的天际线之上。这位建筑师和赞助人在16世纪坎皮多里奥教堂的重建中发挥了关键作用(图1),尽管教皇在山上建造的唯一一座建筑并不是米开朗基罗卡比托利欧合集的一部分。在他漫长的教皇任期的早期,保罗负责建造了法尔内塞宫(Torre Farnese),这是一座坚固的住宅,设计目的是为了防御和统治,当然不是为了美观。直到1885年为了修建维克多·伊曼纽尔纪念碑而拆除之前,法尔内塞塔一直是这座山上若隐若现的存在,俯瞰着这座城市,那里有许多宫殿,这些宫殿代表了文艺复兴时期的古典主义和正式语言,几乎没有一丝痕迹。米开朗基罗为坎皮多里奥的市政宫殿设计的高度创新和暗示的设计也没有更强烈的对比,尽管这些设计直到保罗死后很久才实现(设计的日期是另一个问题,见下文),或者实际上与同一位建筑师的作品,从1546年开始,保罗自己的家族宫殿,法尔内塞宫。最近有人建议,我们应该看到Torre Farnese的乡村特色,传统上有时被称为别墅,在一个更积极的光,作为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scripta Mediaevalia
Scripta Mediaevalia Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Medieval Unfreedoms in a Global Context The Elbian Region as Predatory Landscape, 900–1200 CE: Enslavement, Slaughter, and Settler Colonialism Were Concubines "Anti-Wives"? Revisiting the Biographical Narratives of Maria the Copt in Kitāb al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kubra and ʻInān in Kitāb al-Aghānī al-Kabīr Servile Concubinage in Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Bavaria Performative Subjugation and the Invention of Race: The Danzas de Judios y Moros, Festivals, and Ceremonies in Late Medieval Iberia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1