Deception and Reception in the Commemorative Landscape of Newcastle, Australia, 1970 to 2020

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Index Investing Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.38030/index-journal.2021.3.1
Nikolas Orr
{"title":"Deception and Reception in the Commemorative Landscape of Newcastle, Australia, 1970 to 2020","authors":"Nikolas Orr","doi":"10.38030/index-journal.2021.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary reception of colonial monuments in Australia is informed by global debate on race, memory and representation in public space, typified in the decolonial and anti-racist movements Rhodes Must Fall and Black Lives Matter. While art historians and anti-colonial iconoclasts alike easily conceive of statues as objects for critique, non-figurative sculpture is no less effective when deployed as an ideological tool. Given the typically progressive politics of twentieth-century abstractionists, this study asks how comfortable these artists are with the nation-building function often ascribed to their work by political elites. Through a thematic survey of the commemorative landscape of Newcastle, NSW, this article describes a city punctuated by patriotic references to war, colonialism, and Indigenous absence, exemplified in modernist sculptor Margel Hinder’s (1906–1995) *Civic Park Fountain* (1966). Recounting its relaunch in 1970 as a memorial to Captain James Cook and its vandalism in 2020, the article examines changes in public reception of the fountain, from hostility towards abstract art and government spending to outrage at colonial symbols. Archival reconstruction of Hinder’s responses to local government demonstrates her silence on the fountain’s assimilation to colonial celebration. When contrasted with Hinder’s activities as a lobbyist and camouflage designer, this finding reveals a complex political biography. Without ignoring Hinder’s concern for Aboriginal rights, her attitude towards the instrumentalisation of her work is at best ambivalent. Beyond challenging the apolitical readings of Hinder’s work in existing scholarship, this study provides a key example of the ideological malleability of abstract public art. By producing “empty” signifiers to then “fill” with meaning, abstract sculptors and administrators together help to shape the semiotic and racial topography of urban space.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38030/index-journal.2021.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary reception of colonial monuments in Australia is informed by global debate on race, memory and representation in public space, typified in the decolonial and anti-racist movements Rhodes Must Fall and Black Lives Matter. While art historians and anti-colonial iconoclasts alike easily conceive of statues as objects for critique, non-figurative sculpture is no less effective when deployed as an ideological tool. Given the typically progressive politics of twentieth-century abstractionists, this study asks how comfortable these artists are with the nation-building function often ascribed to their work by political elites. Through a thematic survey of the commemorative landscape of Newcastle, NSW, this article describes a city punctuated by patriotic references to war, colonialism, and Indigenous absence, exemplified in modernist sculptor Margel Hinder’s (1906–1995) *Civic Park Fountain* (1966). Recounting its relaunch in 1970 as a memorial to Captain James Cook and its vandalism in 2020, the article examines changes in public reception of the fountain, from hostility towards abstract art and government spending to outrage at colonial symbols. Archival reconstruction of Hinder’s responses to local government demonstrates her silence on the fountain’s assimilation to colonial celebration. When contrasted with Hinder’s activities as a lobbyist and camouflage designer, this finding reveals a complex political biography. Without ignoring Hinder’s concern for Aboriginal rights, her attitude towards the instrumentalisation of her work is at best ambivalent. Beyond challenging the apolitical readings of Hinder’s work in existing scholarship, this study provides a key example of the ideological malleability of abstract public art. By producing “empty” signifiers to then “fill” with meaning, abstract sculptors and administrators together help to shape the semiotic and racial topography of urban space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1970年至2020年,澳大利亚纽卡斯尔纪念景观中的欺骗与接受
当代澳大利亚对殖民纪念碑的接受受到全球关于种族、记忆和公共空间代表性的辩论的影响,典型的是非殖民主义和反种族主义运动是罗德必须垮台和黑人的生命很重要。虽然艺术史学家和反殖民主义者都很容易将雕像视为批判的对象,但非具象雕塑作为一种意识形态工具也同样有效。考虑到20世纪抽象主义的典型进步政治,本研究询问这些艺术家对政治精英通常赋予其作品的国家建设功能有多满意。通过对新南威尔士州纽卡斯尔的纪念景观的专题调查,本文描述了一个被战争、殖民主义和土著缺席的爱国主义引用所点缀的城市,现代主义雕塑家Margel Hinder的作品(1906-1995)*Civic Park Fountain*(1966)就是例证。这篇文章回顾了这座喷泉1970年作为对詹姆斯·库克船长(Captain James Cook)的纪念而重新开放,以及它在2020年遭到的破坏,并考察了公众对这座喷泉的看法的变化,从对抽象艺术和政府支出的敌意,到对殖民符号的愤怒。对辛德对当地政府的回应的档案重建显示了她对喷泉被殖民庆典同化的沉默。与辛德作为说客和伪装设计师的活动相比,这一发现揭示了一个复杂的政治传记。不忽视辛德对土著权利的关注,她对作品工具化的态度充其量是矛盾的。除了挑战现有学术对辛德作品的非政治性解读之外,本研究还提供了抽象公共艺术的意识形态可塑性的关键例子。通过制造“空的”能指,然后用意义“填充”,抽象雕塑家和管理者共同帮助塑造城市空间的符号学和种族地形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Refusal as Repair Australia in the World’s Art Colonies 1900—Pyrrhic Victory Fugitive Abstraction Destruction or Secession?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1