Revisiting technology-organization-environment (T-O-E) theory for enriched applicability

IF 8 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Bottom Line Pub Date : 2017-03-27 DOI:10.1108/BL-12-2016-0044
Hart O. Awa, Ojiabo Ukoha, S. R. Igwe
{"title":"Revisiting technology-organization-environment (T-O-E) theory for enriched applicability","authors":"Hart O. Awa, Ojiabo Ukoha, S. R. Igwe","doi":"10.1108/BL-12-2016-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThis paper aims to propose and test a ten-factor framework of four contexts from technology-organization-environment (T-O-E) theory and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to provide insight(s) that complements and extends extant inquiries on technology adoption. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nSurvey data were collected from small service enterprises with strong operations in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and the mode of sampling was purposive and snow ball, whereas analysis involved structural equation modeling. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe results show that factors in the technological, organizational and environmental contexts have direct statistically significant relationship with adoption; thus, adoption is more driven by T-O-E factors than by individual factors. For individual context, social factor equally was statistically supported, whereas hedonistic drive was not. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nThe study is limited by its scope of data collection and phases; therefore, extended data are needed to apply the findings to other sectors/industries/countries and to factor in the implementation and post-adoption phases and business to business (B2B) adoption to forge a more holistic framework. \n \n \n \n \nPractical/implications \n \n \n \n \nImplicit is that the findings encourage vendors and policy makers to recognize the strength of interpersonal and group relationships in addition to T-O-E contexts in developing investment decisions. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe paper contributes to the growing research on innovation adoption by using factors within the T-O-E and UTAUT frameworks to explain SMEs’ adoption of technologies.","PeriodicalId":44548,"journal":{"name":"Bottom Line","volume":"22 1","pages":"2-22"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bottom Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-12-2016-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to propose and test a ten-factor framework of four contexts from technology-organization-environment (T-O-E) theory and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to provide insight(s) that complements and extends extant inquiries on technology adoption. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected from small service enterprises with strong operations in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and the mode of sampling was purposive and snow ball, whereas analysis involved structural equation modeling. Findings The results show that factors in the technological, organizational and environmental contexts have direct statistically significant relationship with adoption; thus, adoption is more driven by T-O-E factors than by individual factors. For individual context, social factor equally was statistically supported, whereas hedonistic drive was not. Research limitations/implications The study is limited by its scope of data collection and phases; therefore, extended data are needed to apply the findings to other sectors/industries/countries and to factor in the implementation and post-adoption phases and business to business (B2B) adoption to forge a more holistic framework. Practical/implications Implicit is that the findings encourage vendors and policy makers to recognize the strength of interpersonal and group relationships in addition to T-O-E contexts in developing investment decisions. Originality/value The paper contributes to the growing research on innovation adoption by using factors within the T-O-E and UTAUT frameworks to explain SMEs’ adoption of technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视技术-组织-环境(T-O-E)理论,丰富其适用性
本文旨在从技术-组织-环境(T-O-E)理论和技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)中提出并测试一个包含四种情境的十因素框架,以提供补充和扩展现有技术采用调查的见解。设计/方法/方法调查数据收集自尼日利亚哈科特港运营较强的小型服务企业,抽样模式为目的和雪球,而分析则采用结构方程模型。结果表明,技术、组织和环境因素与采用率有直接的统计显著关系;因此,采用更多的是由T-O-E因素而不是个人因素驱动的。在个体背景下,社会因素同样得到统计支持,而享乐主义驱动则不得到统计支持。研究局限/影响这项研究受限于数据收集的范围和阶段;因此,需要扩展数据来将研究结果应用于其他部门/行业/国家,并考虑到实施和采用后阶段以及企业对企业(B2B)的采用,以形成一个更全面的框架。隐含的是,研究结果鼓励供应商和政策制定者在制定投资决策时,除了T-O-E背景外,还要认识到人际关系和群体关系的力量。本文通过使用T-O-E和UTAUT框架内的因素来解释中小企业对技术的采用,为越来越多的关于创新采用的研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bottom Line
Bottom Line INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
12.20%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Because The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances is written and edited by well respected figures from the librarian community - you can be assured the topics covered will be particularly relevant to you and your library.
期刊最新文献
The impact of media on entrepreneurship participation: a cross-country panel data analysis Digital divide in the major regions of the world and the possibility of convergence Mentorship in librarianship: meeting the needs, addressing the challenges Value co-creation and social media at bottom of pyramid (BOP) Human factors affecting information security in libraries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1