Campus Carry and Constrained Behavior: Faculty and Students’ Perceptual Responses to Campus Carry Laws

Krystal E. Noga-Styron, Sarah Britto
{"title":"Campus Carry and Constrained Behavior: Faculty and Students’ Perceptual Responses to Campus Carry Laws","authors":"Krystal E. Noga-Styron, Sarah Britto","doi":"10.54555/ccjls.4577.37336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, policy discussions and decisions by lawmakers have failed to sufficiently consider the emotional and behavioral reactions of campus community members and how these reactions might shape the academic environment when crafting campus carry laws. Such considerations are especially relevant given the paucity of data on whether open carry laws reduce crime. The current study, which surveyed students, faculty, staff, and administrators at two Pacific Northwest universities (one in Oregon and another in Washington) during the 2016 – 2017 academic year, expands on past research to include variables that measure one’s position on campus and state context. This study also expands on past research that focused primarily on support or opposition to campus carry measures, to include a more nuanced look at what various members of the campus community perceive will be the consequences of campus carry measures. Findings show that both students and faculty perceive negative consequences of campus carry laws and that faculty members would constrain their behaviors more than students if campus carry were allowed. A discussion of control variables and the implications of these findings are explored.","PeriodicalId":36774,"journal":{"name":"Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54555/ccjls.4577.37336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, policy discussions and decisions by lawmakers have failed to sufficiently consider the emotional and behavioral reactions of campus community members and how these reactions might shape the academic environment when crafting campus carry laws. Such considerations are especially relevant given the paucity of data on whether open carry laws reduce crime. The current study, which surveyed students, faculty, staff, and administrators at two Pacific Northwest universities (one in Oregon and another in Washington) during the 2016 – 2017 academic year, expands on past research to include variables that measure one’s position on campus and state context. This study also expands on past research that focused primarily on support or opposition to campus carry measures, to include a more nuanced look at what various members of the campus community perceive will be the consequences of campus carry measures. Findings show that both students and faculty perceive negative consequences of campus carry laws and that faculty members would constrain their behaviors more than students if campus carry were allowed. A discussion of control variables and the implications of these findings are explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校园持枪与约束行为:教师和学生对校园持枪法律的感性反应
从历史上看,立法者的政策讨论和决定未能充分考虑校园社区成员的情绪和行为反应,以及这些反应如何在制定校园携带法律时影响学术环境。鉴于缺乏关于公开携带枪支法是否能减少犯罪的数据,这种考虑尤为重要。目前的研究是在2016 - 2017学年对两所西北太平洋大学(一所在俄勒冈州,另一所在华盛顿)的学生、教职员工和管理人员进行调查的,扩展了过去的研究,包括衡量一个人在校园和州背景中的地位的变量。这项研究还扩展了过去主要关注支持或反对校园携带措施的研究,包括更细致入微的观察校园社区的不同成员对校园携带措施的后果的看法。研究结果表明,学生和教师都认为校园持枪法的负面影响,如果允许校园持枪,教师会比学生更严格地约束自己的行为。讨论控制变量和这些发现的含义进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society
Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Outsider with Insider Privileges: Notes on Going Home Law Enforcement Murdered in the Line of Duty: A County-Level Analysis of Contributing Factors Content Analysis of Judges' Sentiments Toward Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment Tools Perceived Parental Competence, Moral Neutralization, and Cognitive Impulsivity in Relation to Future Delinquency: Understanding the Socialization Process The Grass is Always Greener: Analyzing Crime Concentration and Specialization in Urban Greenspace Environs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1