A quantitative insight of the interactions of prescribers with pharmaceutical organization’s representatives in clinical settings of Karachi

IF 2.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-07-04 DOI:10.2147/IPRP.S196318
Sadia Shakeel, Shagufta Nesar, Wajiha Iffat, B. Fatima, Tahmina Maqbool, S. Jamshed
{"title":"A quantitative insight of the interactions of prescribers with pharmaceutical organization’s representatives in clinical settings of Karachi","authors":"Sadia Shakeel, Shagufta Nesar, Wajiha Iffat, B. Fatima, Tahmina Maqbool, S. Jamshed","doi":"10.2147/IPRP.S196318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the prescribers’ approach of interaction with medical representatives for drug promotion. Methods: An explanatory, cross-sectional design was used to evaluate prescribers’ interactions with the medical sales representatives (MSRs) through an anonymous, self-filled questionnaire from June to December 2017. Data presented as means±SEM or as percentages and statistically analyzed by one way ANOVA, using significance level of 0.05. Results: A response rate of 82.8% was achieved. More than 70% agreed that knowledge obtained from MSRs is reliable and useful. A large proportion of respondents acknowledged that MSRs are a key link between pharmaceutical companies and health care professionals, and their interactions are beneficial as MSRs perform an important teaching function. More than 45% agreed that gifts are influential; however, physicians cannot be compromised with very expensive gifts. The majority of the respondents (76%) considered that promotional items are ethically appropriate; however, 66.21% thought that promotional items influence the practice of prescribing. More than half (52.18%) deemed a promotional material more reliable than a printed advertisement. More than 80% of the respondents opined that medication samples are considered appropriate; however, they should only be given to those patients who cannot financially afford them. Around 69% thought that company-sponsored meetings promote their own drugs under the disguise of CME programs. Conclusion: The present study emphasizes the importance of employing scientifically sound prescribing decision by prescribers in their day to day practice without being influenced by pharmaceutical company’s promotional activities. There is a need for restricting unprincipled practices by the concerned regulatory authorities to evade preventable harm to the patient’s well-being.","PeriodicalId":45655,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","volume":"57 1","pages":"75 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S196318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the prescribers’ approach of interaction with medical representatives for drug promotion. Methods: An explanatory, cross-sectional design was used to evaluate prescribers’ interactions with the medical sales representatives (MSRs) through an anonymous, self-filled questionnaire from June to December 2017. Data presented as means±SEM or as percentages and statistically analyzed by one way ANOVA, using significance level of 0.05. Results: A response rate of 82.8% was achieved. More than 70% agreed that knowledge obtained from MSRs is reliable and useful. A large proportion of respondents acknowledged that MSRs are a key link between pharmaceutical companies and health care professionals, and their interactions are beneficial as MSRs perform an important teaching function. More than 45% agreed that gifts are influential; however, physicians cannot be compromised with very expensive gifts. The majority of the respondents (76%) considered that promotional items are ethically appropriate; however, 66.21% thought that promotional items influence the practice of prescribing. More than half (52.18%) deemed a promotional material more reliable than a printed advertisement. More than 80% of the respondents opined that medication samples are considered appropriate; however, they should only be given to those patients who cannot financially afford them. Around 69% thought that company-sponsored meetings promote their own drugs under the disguise of CME programs. Conclusion: The present study emphasizes the importance of employing scientifically sound prescribing decision by prescribers in their day to day practice without being influenced by pharmaceutical company’s promotional activities. There is a need for restricting unprincipled practices by the concerned regulatory authorities to evade preventable harm to the patient’s well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量洞察处方者的相互作用与制药组织的代表在卡拉奇的临床设置
目的:探讨处方方在药品推广过程中与医学代表互动的方式。方法:采用解释性横断面设计,通过2017年6月至12月的匿名自填问卷,评估处方医师与医疗销售代表(msr)的互动情况。数据以均数±SEM或百分比表示,采用单因素方差分析进行统计分析,显著性水平为0.05。结果:总有效率为82.8%。超过70%的人认为从MSRs获得的知识是可靠和有用的。很大比例的答复者承认,msr是制药公司与卫生保健专业人员之间的关键联系,它们之间的互动是有益的,因为msr发挥着重要的教学功能。超过45%的人认为礼物有影响力;然而,医生不能接受非常昂贵的礼物。大多数受访者(76%)认为促销物品在道德上是合适的;然而,66.21%的人认为促销项目影响了处方的实践。超过一半(52.18%)的人认为宣传材料比印刷广告更可靠。超过80%的受访者认为药物样本是适当的;然而,它们应该只给那些经济上负担不起的病人。大约69%的人认为公司赞助的会议是在CME项目的幌子下推销自己的药物。结论:本研究强调了医生在日常实践中采用科学合理的处方决策的重要性,而不受制药公司促销活动的影响。有必要限制有关监管当局的无原则做法,以避免对患者健康造成可预防的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Readiness for Provision of Online Pharmaceutical Services by Retail Pharmacies in Kampala Metropolitan Area, Uganda. Strengthening Hospital Pharmacy Practice in Nepal Through the Minimum Service Standards Checklist. A Retrospective Study on the Impact and Benefits of Commercial Clinical Decision Support Systems in Clinical Decision-Making and Pharmaceutical Care. Pharmaceutical Care Services in Community Pharmacies: An Umbrella Review of Global Evidence with Insights from Polish and Spanish Practices. Rapid Health Evaluation of Analgesia with Long-Acting Local Anesthesia After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1