The Perspectives of Suadi University Instructors and Learners on the Product and Process Approaches to Second-Language Writing

Q4 Arts and Humanities Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.5539/elt.v16n10p1
Hanan S. Alwaneen
{"title":"The Perspectives of Suadi University Instructors and Learners on the Product and Process Approaches to Second-Language Writing","authors":"Hanan S. Alwaneen","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n10p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates instructors’ and learners’ perspectives on using the product and process approaches to teach second-language writing at a Saudi University, focusing on the variations in perspective between instructors and learners. To this end, the researcher undertook a mixed-method study. Two questionnaires, each consisting of ten items, were used to collect data from 72 participants (47.22% instructors, 52.78% learners); the data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test function of IBM SPSS statistics 28.0. In addition, semi-structured interviews with 12 participants (50% instructors, 50% learners) were conducted to gain a holistic picture. The overall findings reveal no statistically significant difference between instructors’ and learners’ perspectives on the product approach to second-language writing. However, the findings indicate a statistically significant difference in their perspectives on the process approach; instructors perceived the process approach to writing more positively than learners. The current study assists instructors in assessing whether their preferred teaching approach differs from that of their students, enabling them to adopt an ideal approach for both parties.","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n10p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates instructors’ and learners’ perspectives on using the product and process approaches to teach second-language writing at a Saudi University, focusing on the variations in perspective between instructors and learners. To this end, the researcher undertook a mixed-method study. Two questionnaires, each consisting of ten items, were used to collect data from 72 participants (47.22% instructors, 52.78% learners); the data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test function of IBM SPSS statistics 28.0. In addition, semi-structured interviews with 12 participants (50% instructors, 50% learners) were conducted to gain a holistic picture. The overall findings reveal no statistically significant difference between instructors’ and learners’ perspectives on the product approach to second-language writing. However, the findings indicate a statistically significant difference in their perspectives on the process approach; instructors perceived the process approach to writing more positively than learners. The current study assists instructors in assessing whether their preferred teaching approach differs from that of their students, enabling them to adopt an ideal approach for both parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏州大学教师和学习者对第二语言写作的产品和过程方法的看法
本研究调查了在沙特大学使用产品和过程方法进行第二语言写作教学时,教师和学习者的观点,重点关注教师和学习者观点的差异。为此,研究者进行了混合方法研究。问卷共2份,每份问卷共10项,共收集了72名参与者(47.22%为教师,52.78%为学习者)的数据;采用IBM SPSS统计软件28.0的独立样本t检验函数对数据进行分析。此外,对12名参与者(50%为教师,50%为学习者)进行了半结构化访谈,以获得整体情况。整体研究结果显示,教师和学习者对第二语言写作产品法的看法没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,研究结果表明,他们对过程方法的看法在统计上有显著差异;教师比学习者更积极地看待写作过程法。目前的研究帮助教师评估他们喜欢的教学方法是否与学生的不同,使他们能够采用对双方都理想的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of English L2 Vocabulary Learning and Teaching: Concepts, Principles, and Pedagogy Actual Usage of Machine Translation by Japanese University Students and Verification of Test Results Reviewer acknowledgements for English Language Teaching, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2023 Research on the Promotion of EAP Teachers' Information Literacy under TPACK Framework in the Era of Digital Intelligence Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI): Chat GPT for Effective English Language Learning among Thai Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1