Risk Perception Survey on Developing Diabetes Questionnaire: Translation and Validation of the Malay Version

Fatin Aina Abu Bakar, T. A. Tengku Ismail, Suhaily Mohd Hairon, S. S. Mohd Yusoff
{"title":"Risk Perception Survey on Developing Diabetes Questionnaire: Translation and Validation of the Malay Version","authors":"Fatin Aina Abu Bakar, T. A. Tengku Ismail, Suhaily Mohd Hairon, S. S. Mohd Yusoff","doi":"10.31436/imjm.v22i2.2086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The Risk Perception Survey on Developing Diabetes questionnaire identifies how women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) perceived the risk of developing diabetes after their pregnancy has ended. The objective of this study was to translate and validate an English questionnaire into Malay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2019 to July 2019 among 200 women with GDM who attended public health clinics in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. The original author of the questionnaire granted us permission to use for this study. The translation of the questionnaire, content, and face validation was performed. It was followed by confirmatory factor analysis using R version 3.5.3 and item analysis for the knowledge domain. The composite reliability and internal consistency reliability using Cronbach alpha were also computed. RESULTS: The Malay version consists of 20 items in five domains; personal control (2 items), optimistic bias (2 items), knowledge of diabetes risk factors (11 items), benefits and barriers of preventive behaviour (3 items), and risk perception (2 items). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the structure of the model. The goodness-of-fit values were adequate [comparative fit index=0.994, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.990, standardized root mean square residual=0.038, root mean square of approximation=0.021 (90% CI: 0.000,0.064)]. The four domains had composite reliability values between 0.60 and 0.88. The Cronbach alpha value for knowledge of diabetes risk factors domain was 0.843. CONCLUSION: The translated Malay questionnaire is valid and reliable to assess the perception of women with GDM towards their future risk of getting diabetes.","PeriodicalId":13474,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v22i2.2086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Risk Perception Survey on Developing Diabetes questionnaire identifies how women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) perceived the risk of developing diabetes after their pregnancy has ended. The objective of this study was to translate and validate an English questionnaire into Malay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2019 to July 2019 among 200 women with GDM who attended public health clinics in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. The original author of the questionnaire granted us permission to use for this study. The translation of the questionnaire, content, and face validation was performed. It was followed by confirmatory factor analysis using R version 3.5.3 and item analysis for the knowledge domain. The composite reliability and internal consistency reliability using Cronbach alpha were also computed. RESULTS: The Malay version consists of 20 items in five domains; personal control (2 items), optimistic bias (2 items), knowledge of diabetes risk factors (11 items), benefits and barriers of preventive behaviour (3 items), and risk perception (2 items). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the structure of the model. The goodness-of-fit values were adequate [comparative fit index=0.994, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.990, standardized root mean square residual=0.038, root mean square of approximation=0.021 (90% CI: 0.000,0.064)]. The four domains had composite reliability values between 0.60 and 0.88. The Cronbach alpha value for knowledge of diabetes risk factors domain was 0.843. CONCLUSION: The translated Malay questionnaire is valid and reliable to assess the perception of women with GDM towards their future risk of getting diabetes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展中糖尿病问卷之风险认知调查:马来文版之翻译与验证
导读:发展中糖尿病风险认知调查问卷确定妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)妇女在妊娠结束后如何感知发展为糖尿病的风险。本研究的目的是将一份英文问卷翻译成马来文并加以验证。材料和方法:2019年2月至2019年7月,在马来西亚新山公共卫生诊所就诊的200名GDM女性中进行了一项横断面研究。问卷的原作者同意我们在本研究中使用问卷。进行问卷翻译、内容翻译和人脸验证。运用R 3.5.3进行验证性因子分析,并对知识域进行项目分析。采用Cronbach alpha法计算了复合信度和内部一致性信度。结果:马来语版本包含5个域的20个条目;个人控制(2项)、乐观偏见(2项)、糖尿病危险因素知识(11项)、预防行为的益处和障碍(3项)、风险认知(2项)。验证性因子分析证实了模型的结构。拟合优度足够[比较拟合指数=0.994,Tucker-Lewis指数=0.990,标准化均方根残差=0.038,近似均方根残差=0.021 (90% CI: 0.000,0.064)]。4个域的综合信度值在0.60 ~ 0.88之间。糖尿病危险因素领域知识的Cronbach alpha值为0.843。结论:马来语翻译问卷可有效可靠地评估GDM女性对其未来患糖尿病风险的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-traumatic, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms among Malaysian Firefighters “You Know How People Talk,” Reasons Behind Child Marriage among Female Youth in The North-Eastern State of West Malaysia Holistic Management of Diabetic Foot: Redefining Strategy Microbiome Dysbiosis in Depression: A Narrative Review Effectiveness of Hypertonic Saline, Polidocanol, and Glycerol as Sclerosing Agent: An Experimental Study in Javan Rabbits (Lepus nigricollis)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1