A Comparison of Information Criterion for Choosing Copula Models

S. Muela, Carmen López-Martín
{"title":"A Comparison of Information Criterion for Choosing Copula Models","authors":"S. Muela, Carmen López-Martín","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v16n4p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of this paper is to analyse the ability of the Information Criterion in selecting the best copula model. For this study, we carry out a simulation exercise considering five one-parameter copula families: Normal, Student-t with ν degree freedom, Clayton, Gumbel and Frank. For each family copulas, three degrees of dependence and three size samples. The Information Criterion included in the comparison are AIC, BIC, HQIC, SIC. The results obtained are as follow; (i) we find that for a high dependence level (0.9) the reliability of the Information Criterion (IC) is quite good, but it reduces with the dependence level; (ii) the performance of the IC not only depends on the dependence degree but the size sample. In the case of considering negative dependence the reliability of the IC does not depend on the dependence degree but the size sample. As the size sample reduce the performed of the IC reduce. To last, in a comparison among the IC considered, we find that the BIC criterion is the most reliable follow by SIC. AIC and HQIC reaps similar results.","PeriodicalId":13861,"journal":{"name":"International journal of business research","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of business research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n4p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The object of this paper is to analyse the ability of the Information Criterion in selecting the best copula model. For this study, we carry out a simulation exercise considering five one-parameter copula families: Normal, Student-t with ν degree freedom, Clayton, Gumbel and Frank. For each family copulas, three degrees of dependence and three size samples. The Information Criterion included in the comparison are AIC, BIC, HQIC, SIC. The results obtained are as follow; (i) we find that for a high dependence level (0.9) the reliability of the Information Criterion (IC) is quite good, but it reduces with the dependence level; (ii) the performance of the IC not only depends on the dependence degree but the size sample. In the case of considering negative dependence the reliability of the IC does not depend on the dependence degree but the size sample. As the size sample reduce the performed of the IC reduce. To last, in a comparison among the IC considered, we find that the BIC criterion is the most reliable follow by SIC. AIC and HQIC reaps similar results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择Copula模型的信息准则比较
本文的目的是分析信息准则选择最佳联结模型的能力。在本研究中,我们进行了五个单参数copula族的模拟练习:Normal, Student-t with ν自由度,Clayton, Gumbel和Frank。对于每个家庭,三个依赖程度和三个大小的样本。比较的信息标准包括AIC、BIC、HQIC、SIC。所得结果如下:(1)我们发现,在高依赖水平(0.9)下,信息准则(IC)的信度相当好,但随着依赖水平的增加而降低;(ii)集成电路的性能不仅取决于依赖程度,而且取决于样本的大小。在考虑负依赖的情况下,集成电路的可靠性不取决于依赖程度,而取决于样本的大小。随着样品尺寸的减小,集成电路的性能也随之减小。最后,在考虑的IC之间的比较中,我们发现BIC标准是最可靠的,其次是SIC标准。AIC和HQIC获得了类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IDENTIFYING LEADERSHIP ETHICS: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF WARRICK'S (1981) LEADERSHIP STYLE IDENTIFIER FRAMEWORK Banking Transparency, Financial Information and Liquidity Risk Management: Case of Saudi Banks Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Business Research, Vol. 16, No. 11 Birth Order and Executive Risk-Taking: A Study on CEO Behavioral Disposition The Chance of FinTech to be a New General-Purpose Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1