Design, Control, and Comparison of Low-Energy Solenoid Valve Actuators

J. V. Dam, B. Gysen, M. Dhaens, Elena A. Lomonova
{"title":"Design, Control, and Comparison of Low-Energy Solenoid Valve Actuators","authors":"J. V. Dam, B. Gysen, M. Dhaens, Elena A. Lomonova","doi":"10.1109/INTMAG.2018.8508342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An automotive, fluid-control solenoid valve is composed of an electromagnetic reluctance actuator and a near-constant-force spring. Reluctance actuators are applied as electromagnetic brakes in aerospace applications [1], as valves that perform fast sorting tasks by means of short air-pulses in the manufacturing industry [2], as accurate fluid-control valves in petrochemical processes [3], and in the automotive industry to achieve variable valve timing in camless engines [4]. Common desires are a fast switching and low noise upon impact. Preferably, these objectives are met with minimized energy consumption, especially during constant position operation. In addition, minimizing the impact velocity improves valve lifetime and reduces the audible noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH). This paper considers cylindrical reluctance actuators due to their low cost. However, this complicates the use of laminations to minimize eddy current effects in a cost-effective manner. Proper analysis, design, and optimization of the reluctance actuator can, therefore, only be performed if these dynamic effects in the actuator are accounted for. This paper will focus on incorporating the eddy current effect in the models and their effect on performance, as well as control methods to improve the performance and minimize energy consumption. The performance of a classical reluctance actuator (Fig. 1a) is compared to a PM-biased topology (Fig. 1b) which reduces the energy consumption. Modeling is performed using transient, axisymmetric, nonlinear finite element (FE) simulations, coupled to Matlab-Simulink. Actuator topology and constraints Two single-coil reluctance actuators are shown in Fig. 1. One is a classical reluctance actuator with a stationary coil and a moving plunger (CLA). A second actuator includes a permanent magnet atop the core (PMB) to allow zero-power latching by means of a passive attraction force [1], [3], [5]. In addition, the actuator height and diameter are 16 and 13 mm, with a stroke of 0.25 mm. Moreover, the plunger of mass 1.2 g experiences an opposing force of 4 to 12N. Finally, the closed-toopen transition can last maximally 4 ms, with a typical valve-open time of several seconds. Open-loop simulation results In an open-loop co-simulation between Simulink and FE software, predefined voltage profiles are applied to the actuators, while the current is limited. In Fig. 2a, the electromagnetic force develops 0.075 ms slower in cases with eddy currents, and the final position is reached 0.115 ms later. This indicates the inherent eddy current damping in the device, slowing down the plunger. In addition, once the movement commences and the airgap closes, the developed electromagnetic force increases rapidly while the opposing force decreases, resulting in a quickly moving plunger. As a result of applying the voltage profiles in Fig. 2b, the corresponding coil currents develop. Note that equal voltages are applied to CLA and PMB until 1.15 ms, after which CLA requires a small hold voltage (1V) to hold the valve open (latch), whereas PMB achieves this passively. Therefore, the hold power can be reduced to zero using PMB. Fig. 2c shows the (in)ability of the actuators to passively latch the valve. The plunger in CLA retracts quickly after (<0.2ms) the supply voltage is removed, as the developed electromagnetic force drops below the opposing force. On the other hand, PMB latches indefinitely, under equal operating conditions, because of the passive attraction force provided by the PM. In general, the predefined voltage profiles produce unnecessarily high forces, indicating that additional control can greatly improve the energy efficiency. Moreover, a significant energy consumption reduction can be achieved by latching passively, and, therefore, reducing to zero the coil current and the hold power using PMB. In addition, plunger closed-to-open movement takes under 0.3ms without achieving a soft landing, while 4ms is allowed. Together, these considerations require to investigate closed-loop feedback control.","PeriodicalId":6571,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Magnetic Conference (INTERMAG)","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Magnetic Conference (INTERMAG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTMAG.2018.8508342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

An automotive, fluid-control solenoid valve is composed of an electromagnetic reluctance actuator and a near-constant-force spring. Reluctance actuators are applied as electromagnetic brakes in aerospace applications [1], as valves that perform fast sorting tasks by means of short air-pulses in the manufacturing industry [2], as accurate fluid-control valves in petrochemical processes [3], and in the automotive industry to achieve variable valve timing in camless engines [4]. Common desires are a fast switching and low noise upon impact. Preferably, these objectives are met with minimized energy consumption, especially during constant position operation. In addition, minimizing the impact velocity improves valve lifetime and reduces the audible noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH). This paper considers cylindrical reluctance actuators due to their low cost. However, this complicates the use of laminations to minimize eddy current effects in a cost-effective manner. Proper analysis, design, and optimization of the reluctance actuator can, therefore, only be performed if these dynamic effects in the actuator are accounted for. This paper will focus on incorporating the eddy current effect in the models and their effect on performance, as well as control methods to improve the performance and minimize energy consumption. The performance of a classical reluctance actuator (Fig. 1a) is compared to a PM-biased topology (Fig. 1b) which reduces the energy consumption. Modeling is performed using transient, axisymmetric, nonlinear finite element (FE) simulations, coupled to Matlab-Simulink. Actuator topology and constraints Two single-coil reluctance actuators are shown in Fig. 1. One is a classical reluctance actuator with a stationary coil and a moving plunger (CLA). A second actuator includes a permanent magnet atop the core (PMB) to allow zero-power latching by means of a passive attraction force [1], [3], [5]. In addition, the actuator height and diameter are 16 and 13 mm, with a stroke of 0.25 mm. Moreover, the plunger of mass 1.2 g experiences an opposing force of 4 to 12N. Finally, the closed-toopen transition can last maximally 4 ms, with a typical valve-open time of several seconds. Open-loop simulation results In an open-loop co-simulation between Simulink and FE software, predefined voltage profiles are applied to the actuators, while the current is limited. In Fig. 2a, the electromagnetic force develops 0.075 ms slower in cases with eddy currents, and the final position is reached 0.115 ms later. This indicates the inherent eddy current damping in the device, slowing down the plunger. In addition, once the movement commences and the airgap closes, the developed electromagnetic force increases rapidly while the opposing force decreases, resulting in a quickly moving plunger. As a result of applying the voltage profiles in Fig. 2b, the corresponding coil currents develop. Note that equal voltages are applied to CLA and PMB until 1.15 ms, after which CLA requires a small hold voltage (1V) to hold the valve open (latch), whereas PMB achieves this passively. Therefore, the hold power can be reduced to zero using PMB. Fig. 2c shows the (in)ability of the actuators to passively latch the valve. The plunger in CLA retracts quickly after (<0.2ms) the supply voltage is removed, as the developed electromagnetic force drops below the opposing force. On the other hand, PMB latches indefinitely, under equal operating conditions, because of the passive attraction force provided by the PM. In general, the predefined voltage profiles produce unnecessarily high forces, indicating that additional control can greatly improve the energy efficiency. Moreover, a significant energy consumption reduction can be achieved by latching passively, and, therefore, reducing to zero the coil current and the hold power using PMB. In addition, plunger closed-to-open movement takes under 0.3ms without achieving a soft landing, while 4ms is allowed. Together, these considerations require to investigate closed-loop feedback control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低能量电磁阀执行器的设计、控制与比较
一种汽车流体控制电磁阀由电磁磁阻执行器和近恒力弹簧组成。磁阻执行器在航空航天应用中用作电磁制动器[1],在制造业中用作通过短空气脉冲执行快速分选任务的阀门[2],在石油化工过程中用作精确的流体控制阀[3],在汽车工业中用于实现无凸轮发动机的可变气门正时[4]。常见的要求是开关速度快,碰撞时噪音低。最好能以最小的能量消耗来满足这些目标,特别是在恒定位置操作期间。此外,最大限度地降低冲击速度可以延长阀门的使用寿命,降低可听噪音、振动和粗糙度(NVH)。考虑圆柱磁阻作动器的低成本。然而,这使层压的使用变得复杂,以经济有效的方式将涡流效应最小化。因此,只有考虑到致动器中的这些动态效应,才能对磁阻致动器进行适当的分析、设计和优化。本文将重点研究将涡流效应纳入模型及其对性能的影响,以及提高性能和最小化能耗的控制方法。经典磁阻执行器(图1a)的性能与pm偏置拓扑(图1b)的性能进行了比较,从而降低了能耗。建模使用瞬态、轴对称、非线性有限元(FE)模拟,并与Matlab-Simulink耦合。两个单线圈磁阻执行器如图1所示。一种是经典的磁阻执行器,具有固定线圈和移动柱塞(CLA)。第二个致动器包括磁芯顶部的永磁体(PMB),通过被动吸引力实现零功率闭锁[1],[3],[5]。此外,执行器高度和直径分别为16和13 mm,行程为0.25 mm。此外,质量为1.2 g的柱塞受到4到12N的反作用力。最后,从关闭到打开的过渡最长可持续4毫秒,典型的阀门打开时间为几秒钟。在Simulink和FE软件之间的开环联合仿真中,在限制电流的情况下,对执行器施加预定义的电压曲线。在图2a中,在涡流情况下,电磁力的发展速度慢了0.075 ms,最终位置晚了0.115 ms。这表明装置中固有的涡流阻尼使柱塞减速。此外,一旦运动开始,气隙关闭,形成的电磁力迅速增大,而反作用力减小,导致柱塞快速运动。由于施加图2b中的电压曲线,相应的线圈电流发展。注意,CLA和PMB的电压相等,直到1.15 ms,之后CLA需要一个小的保持电压(1V)来保持阀门打开(闩锁),而PMB则被动地实现这一点。因此,使用PMB可以将保持功率降低到零。图2c显示了执行机构被动锁紧阀门的能力。在电源电压移除后(<0.2ms), CLA中的柱塞迅速缩回,因为产生的电磁力降至反作用力以下。另一方面,在相同的操作条件下,由于PM提供的被动吸引力,PMB无限期锁存。一般来说,预定义的电压分布产生不必要的高力,表明额外的控制可以大大提高能源效率。此外,通过被动锁存可以实现显著的能耗降低,因此,使用PMB将线圈电流和保持功率降至零。此外,在不实现软着陆的情况下,柱塞从闭到开的运动时间不到0.3ms,而允许4ms。总之,这些考虑需要研究闭环反馈控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-order methods applied to electrical machine modeling. 3D Structure Line Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor Design Based on Selective Laser Melting of 3D Printing. Memory Efficient Harmonic Method for Electromagnetic Models Using Scattering Matrices. Convergence Analysis of SEM and FEM to an analytical field distribution in the airgap. Eddy Current-TMR Sensor for Micro-Motion Detection of Orthopaedic Implants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1