Dalla progettazione lineare alla co-progettazione condivisa: l’esperienza in un liceo della provincia di Salerno

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI:10.7358/ecps-2017-015-nott
A. M. Notti, A. Petolicchio
{"title":"Dalla progettazione lineare alla co-progettazione condivisa: l’esperienza in un liceo della provincia di Salerno","authors":"A. M. Notti, A. Petolicchio","doi":"10.7358/ecps-2017-015-nott","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning planning, often considered by teacher as a bureaucratic practice, becomes a declination of goals, objectives, methods listed in «Indicazioni nazionali». The prescriptive guidance main programme and the choices made by the anthology authors of textbooks seem to leave little space to realize a planning that, with respect to subject content, can respond to the needs of students as individuals. In «Indicazioni nazionali» for high schools of 2010, it should be noted that at the end of the course of study the student must understand the intrinsic value of reading as a response to a self interest and that the study of literature must be through direct contact with lyrics. How can we combine students interests and disciplinary knowledge? How can we avoid the risk that the choices are fruit tastes teacher’s anthology set or authors of textbooks, rather than selections made to convey better the message to those particular students? Starting from these considerations the action-research in progress in two fifth classes of the high school «Alfonso Gatto» in Agropoli, moves. Using the approach of Student Voice, individual students were actively involved in the Italian learning planning. Choosing and motivating some keywords that have become the fil rouge that drove the track selection and authors anthology to be explored. This paper focuses on it.","PeriodicalId":41872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"171-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2017-015-nott","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning planning, often considered by teacher as a bureaucratic practice, becomes a declination of goals, objectives, methods listed in «Indicazioni nazionali». The prescriptive guidance main programme and the choices made by the anthology authors of textbooks seem to leave little space to realize a planning that, with respect to subject content, can respond to the needs of students as individuals. In «Indicazioni nazionali» for high schools of 2010, it should be noted that at the end of the course of study the student must understand the intrinsic value of reading as a response to a self interest and that the study of literature must be through direct contact with lyrics. How can we combine students interests and disciplinary knowledge? How can we avoid the risk that the choices are fruit tastes teacher’s anthology set or authors of textbooks, rather than selections made to convey better the message to those particular students? Starting from these considerations the action-research in progress in two fifth classes of the high school «Alfonso Gatto» in Agropoli, moves. Using the approach of Student Voice, individual students were actively involved in the Italian learning planning. Choosing and motivating some keywords that have become the fil rouge that drove the track selection and authors anthology to be explored. This paper focuses on it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从线性设计到共享设计:萨莱诺高中的经验
学习计划,经常被教师认为是一种官僚主义的实践,变成了“指示”中列出的目标、目的和方法的衰落。规定性的指导、主要方案和教科书选集作者的选择似乎没有给实现学科内容方面的规划留下多少空间,这些规划可以满足学生作为个体的需求。在2010年高中的“国家指示”中,应该指出的是,在学习课程结束时,学生必须理解阅读作为对自身兴趣的回应的内在价值,并且文学研究必须通过直接接触歌词。如何将学生的兴趣与学科知识结合起来?我们怎样才能避免这样的风险,即选择的是水果口味,教师选集或教科书作者,而不是为了更好地向特定的学生传达信息而选择的?从这些考虑出发,行动研究正在进行的两个第五班的高中«Alfonso Gatto»在Agropoli,移动。采用“学生之声”的方法,每个学生都积极参与到意大利语学习计划中来。一些关键词的选取和激励,成为推动选曲和作者选集探索的“底色”。本文的研究重点在于此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Darwin, la pandemia e il trionfo della «ignoranza credulona» o della «stupidità umana». Il caso Texas e la situazione italiana / Darwin, the Pandemic and the Triumph of «Gullible Ignorance» or of «Human Stupidity». The Case of Texas and the Italian Situation A Massive Open Online Course Designed to Support the Development of Virtual Mobility Transversal Skills: Preliminary Evaluation Results from European Participants. Misurare l’omonegatività: validazione italiana della Multidimensional Scale of Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Ci sono differenti predittori della lettura nelle lingue che hanno un’ortografia trasparente? Evidenze da uno studio longitudinale. Are There Any Differences between the Texts Written by Students Who Are Blind, Those Who Are Partially Sighted, and Those with Normal Vision?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1