Interval-valued symbolic representation based method for off-line signature verification

S. Pal, Alireza Alaei, U. Pal, M. Blumenstein
{"title":"Interval-valued symbolic representation based method for off-line signature verification","authors":"S. Pal, Alireza Alaei, U. Pal, M. Blumenstein","doi":"10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this investigation is to present an interval-symbolic representation based method for offline signature verification. In the feature extraction stage, Connected Components (CC), Enclosed Regions (ER), Basic Features (BF) and Curvelet Feature (CF)-based approaches are used to characterize signatures. Considering the extracted feature vectors, an interval data value is created for each feature extracted from every individual's signatures as an interval-valued symbolic data. This process results in a signature model for each individual that consists of a set of interval values. A similarity measure is proposed as the classifier in this paper. The interval-valued symbolic representation based method has never been used for signature verification considering Indian script signatures. Therefore, to evaluate the proposed method, a Hindi signature database consisting of 2400 (100×24) genuine signatures and 3000 (100×30) skilled forgeries is employed for experimentation. Concerning this large Hindi signature dataset, the highest verification accuracy of 91.83% was obtained on a joint feature set considering all four sets of features, while 2.5%, 13.84% and 8.17% of FAR (False Acceptance Rate), FRR (False Rejection Rate), and AER (Average Error Rate) were achieved, respectively.","PeriodicalId":6539,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The objective of this investigation is to present an interval-symbolic representation based method for offline signature verification. In the feature extraction stage, Connected Components (CC), Enclosed Regions (ER), Basic Features (BF) and Curvelet Feature (CF)-based approaches are used to characterize signatures. Considering the extracted feature vectors, an interval data value is created for each feature extracted from every individual's signatures as an interval-valued symbolic data. This process results in a signature model for each individual that consists of a set of interval values. A similarity measure is proposed as the classifier in this paper. The interval-valued symbolic representation based method has never been used for signature verification considering Indian script signatures. Therefore, to evaluate the proposed method, a Hindi signature database consisting of 2400 (100×24) genuine signatures and 3000 (100×30) skilled forgeries is employed for experimentation. Concerning this large Hindi signature dataset, the highest verification accuracy of 91.83% was obtained on a joint feature set considering all four sets of features, while 2.5%, 13.84% and 8.17% of FAR (False Acceptance Rate), FRR (False Rejection Rate), and AER (Average Error Rate) were achieved, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于区间值符号表示的离线签名验证方法
本研究的目的是提出一种基于区间符号表示的离线签名验证方法。在特征提取阶段,采用连通成分(CC)、封闭区域(ER)、基本特征(BF)和曲波特征(CF)等方法对签名进行特征提取。考虑提取的特征向量,对从每个个体签名中提取的每个特征创建一个区间数据值作为区间值符号数据。此过程将为每个个体生成一个签名模型,该模型由一组间隔值组成。本文提出了一种相似度测度作为分类器。考虑到印度文字签名,基于区间值符号表示的方法从未用于签名验证。因此,为了评估所提出的方法,使用了一个由2400个(100×24)真实签名和3000个(100×30)熟练伪造签名组成的印地语签名数据库进行实验。在此大型印地语签名数据集上,综合考虑所有四组特征的联合特征集的验证准确率最高,达到91.83%,而FAR (False Acceptance Rate)、FRR (False Rejection Rate)和AER (Average Error Rate)的准确率分别为2.5%、13.84%和8.17%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient conformal regressors using bagged neural nets Repeated play of the SVM game as a means of adaptive classification Unit commitment considering multiple charging and discharging scenarios of plug-in electric vehicles High-dimensional function approximation using local linear embedding A label compression coding approach through maximizing dependence between features and labels for multi-label classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1