Validez diagnóstica del índice de resistividad en pacientes trasplantados renales con disfunción del injerto: correlación histológica

Paula García Barquín , Jon Etxano Cantera , Maite Millor Muruzabal , Hernán Dario Quiceno Arias , David Cano Dafart , Alberto Benito Boillos
{"title":"Validez diagnóstica del índice de resistividad en pacientes trasplantados renales con disfunción del injerto: correlación histológica","authors":"Paula García Barquín ,&nbsp;Jon Etxano Cantera ,&nbsp;Maite Millor Muruzabal ,&nbsp;Hernán Dario Quiceno Arias ,&nbsp;David Cano Dafart ,&nbsp;Alberto Benito Boillos","doi":"10.1016/j.dialis.2014.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To estimate the diagnostic validity of the resistance index (RI) in renal transplant patients with graft dysfunction, using the histopathological findings as gold standard.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed on the biopsies of 85 patients with renal graft dysfunction. Patients were grouped according to the histological findings: normal findings, acute rejection, chronic rejection, and other findings. The RI was assessed by Doppler ultrasound, considering values of<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.55 and<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->.75 as pathological, and were analyzed along with the findings in the biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of RI were assessed. The mean RI was compared between patients with normal and abnormal pathological findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The RI was normal in 59 patients, and pathological in 26. The RI showed a specificity of 72.73% and a high positive predictive value of 88.46% in patients with graft dysfunction. There was no statistically significant difference (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.196) in the RI between patients with normal and pathological histopathology in the biopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite its low sensitivity, the RI is reliable in detecting an abnormal parameter when its value is outside the reference range. However the performing a biopsy is still required to determine the cause of the kidney disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100373,"journal":{"name":"Diálisis y Trasplante","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 15-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dialis.2014.10.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diálisis y Trasplante","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1886284514001933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the diagnostic validity of the resistance index (RI) in renal transplant patients with graft dysfunction, using the histopathological findings as gold standard.

Material and methods

A retrospective review was performed on the biopsies of 85 patients with renal graft dysfunction. Patients were grouped according to the histological findings: normal findings, acute rejection, chronic rejection, and other findings. The RI was assessed by Doppler ultrasound, considering values of < .55 and > .75 as pathological, and were analyzed along with the findings in the biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of RI were assessed. The mean RI was compared between patients with normal and abnormal pathological findings.

Results

The RI was normal in 59 patients, and pathological in 26. The RI showed a specificity of 72.73% and a high positive predictive value of 88.46% in patients with graft dysfunction. There was no statistically significant difference (P = .196) in the RI between patients with normal and pathological histopathology in the biopsy.

Conclusion

Despite its low sensitivity, the RI is reliable in detecting an abnormal parameter when its value is outside the reference range. However the performing a biopsy is still required to determine the cause of the kidney disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾移植功能障碍患者电阻率指数的诊断有效性:组织学相关性
目的以肾移植患者的组织病理表现为金标准,评价肾移植患者肾阻力指数(RI)的诊断有效性。材料与方法对85例移植肾功能不全患者的活检资料进行回顾性分析。患者根据组织学表现进行分组:正常表现、急性排斥反应、慢性排斥反应和其他表现。通过多普勒超声评估RI,考虑<.55及>75例为病理,并结合活检结果进行分析。评估RI的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。比较病理结果正常与异常患者的平均RI。结果59例mri正常,26例病理。在移植物功能障碍患者中,RI的特异性为72.73%,阳性预测值为88.46%。组织病理学正常与病理活检患者的RI差异无统计学意义(P = 0.196)。结论虽然RI的灵敏度较低,但当其值超出参考范围时,其检测异常参数是可靠的。然而,仍然需要进行活检来确定肾脏疾病的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Condiciones de vivienda y el desarrollo de la primera peritonitis en pacientes que iniciaron diálisis peritoneal en el periodo 2002-2011 en un hospital de Lima Deficiencia funcional de hierro en pacientes de hemodiálisis. Utilidad de la hemoglobina reticulocitaria y recuento de reticulocitos inmaduros Infección de catéteres venosos centrales para hemodiálisis Estudio prospectivo controlado aleatorizado sobre el uso precoz de espironolactona o losartán en la regresión de la HVI postrasplante renal [XXXVII SEDYT 2015] Implantación de la pauta de hemodiálisis incremental (2 sesiones a la semana) en pacientes que inician tratamiento renal sustitutivo. Experiencia de un centro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1