Measuring Students’ Critical Thinking in Online Environment: Methodology, Conceptual Framework and Tasks Typology

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-187-212
K. Tarasova, E. Orel
{"title":"Measuring Students’ Critical Thinking in Online Environment: Methodology, Conceptual Framework and Tasks Typology","authors":"K. Tarasova, E. Orel","doi":"10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-187-212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today critical thinking is one of the key competencies of the modern world. The abundance and availability of various information ( in particular due to the spread of electronic devices and the Internet) suggest that people, regardless of age, need to be able to effectively navigate and evaluate information, draw their own conclusions and use arguments when making decisions. Research of critical thinking in terms of the possibilities of its evaluation and development began more than 60 years ago and has a wide and heterogeneous field of theoretical approaches. In this article, we explore the theoretical possibility of measuring the complex latent construct “critical thinking in an online environment” using the Evidence- Centered Design (ECD) methodology. It allows one to build a chain of arguments that substantiate the conclusion about the level of critical thinking development in the respondent and thereby ensure the fairness of the assessment process. The measurement goes from theoretical assumptions about the nature of the construct to the search for empirical evidence - observable actions in the testing process, allowing to draw reasonable conclusions about the respondents. The result of the work is a theoretical framework for assessing critical thinking in an online environment for university students and its operationalization through the relevant observed behavior of the target audience, which allows obtaining valid data on the severity of critical thinking. This is the first step to create an instrument in Russian with a confirmed psychometric quality. The key feature of the tool is that the student does not work in a simulated environment where information sources are selected by developers, but in an open online environment, therefore, he can use any available materials to solve the task.","PeriodicalId":54119,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-3-187-212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Today critical thinking is one of the key competencies of the modern world. The abundance and availability of various information ( in particular due to the spread of electronic devices and the Internet) suggest that people, regardless of age, need to be able to effectively navigate and evaluate information, draw their own conclusions and use arguments when making decisions. Research of critical thinking in terms of the possibilities of its evaluation and development began more than 60 years ago and has a wide and heterogeneous field of theoretical approaches. In this article, we explore the theoretical possibility of measuring the complex latent construct “critical thinking in an online environment” using the Evidence- Centered Design (ECD) methodology. It allows one to build a chain of arguments that substantiate the conclusion about the level of critical thinking development in the respondent and thereby ensure the fairness of the assessment process. The measurement goes from theoretical assumptions about the nature of the construct to the search for empirical evidence - observable actions in the testing process, allowing to draw reasonable conclusions about the respondents. The result of the work is a theoretical framework for assessing critical thinking in an online environment for university students and its operationalization through the relevant observed behavior of the target audience, which allows obtaining valid data on the severity of critical thinking. This is the first step to create an instrument in Russian with a confirmed psychometric quality. The key feature of the tool is that the student does not work in a simulated environment where information sources are selected by developers, but in an open online environment, therefore, he can use any available materials to solve the task.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线环境下学生批判性思维的测量:方法、概念框架和任务类型
今天,批判性思维是现代世界的关键能力之一。各种信息的丰富和可用性(特别是由于电子设备和互联网的普及)表明,无论年龄大小,人们都需要能够有效地浏览和评估信息,得出自己的结论,并在做出决定时使用论点。就批判性思维的评价和发展的可能性而言,批判性思维的研究始于60多年前,具有广泛而多样的理论方法领域。在本文中,我们探讨了使用以证据为中心的设计(ECD)方法测量复杂潜在构念“在线环境中的批判性思维”的理论可能性。它允许人们建立一个论证链,以证实关于被调查者批判性思维发展水平的结论,从而确保评估过程的公平性。测量从关于结构本质的理论假设到寻找经验证据-在测试过程中观察到的行为,从而得出关于被调查者的合理结论。这项工作的结果是一个理论框架,用于评估大学生在线环境中的批判性思维,并通过观察目标受众的相关行为将其操作化,从而获得关于批判性思维严重程度的有效数据。这是创造一种具有确定心理测量质量的俄语仪器的第一步。该工具的主要特点是,学生不是在开发人员选择信息源的模拟环境中工作,而是在开放的在线环境中工作,因此,他可以使用任何可用的材料来解决任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Power of Probability in Psychometrics. Review of the book “Bayesian Psychometric Modeling“ The Role of Context in Scenario-Based Tasks for Measuring Universal Skills: The Use of Generalizability Theory Experience of Using Bifactor Models to Reduce the Effects of Social Desirability on the Normative Questionnaire of Universal Competencies Psychometric Research: Modern Methods and New Opportunities for Education Psychometrics and Cognitive Research: Contradictions and Possibility for Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1