The Coloniality of Migration and the “Refugee Crisis”: On the Asylum-Migration Nexus, the Transatlantic White European Settler Colonialism-Migration and Racial Capitalism

IF 0.9 Q3 DEMOGRAPHY Refuge Pub Date : 2018-06-18 DOI:10.7202/1050851ar
E. Gutiérrez Rodríguez
{"title":"The Coloniality of Migration and the “Refugee Crisis”: On the Asylum-Migration Nexus, the Transatlantic White European Settler Colonialism-Migration and Racial Capitalism","authors":"E. Gutiérrez Rodríguez","doi":"10.7202/1050851ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article departs from the discussion by Stephen Castles on the migration-asylum nexus by focusing on the political and cultural effects of the summer of immigration in 2015. It argues for a conceptualization of the asylum-migration nexus within the framework of Anibal Quijano’s “coloniality of power” by developing the analytical framework of the “coloniality of migration.” Through the analytical framework of the “coloniality of migration” the connection between racial capitalism and the asylum-migration nexus is explored. It does so by first focusing on the economic and political links between asylum and migration, and how both constitute each other. On these grounds, it discusses how asylum and migration policies produce hierarchical categories of migrants and refugees, producing a nomenclature drawing on an imaginary reminiscent of the orientalist and racialized practices of European colonialism and imperialism. In a second step, it focuses on migration and asylum policies as inherent to a logic of racialization of the workforce. It does so by first exploring the racial coding of immigration policies within the context of settler colonial-ism and transatlantic White European migration to the Américas and Oceania in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and second, by discussing migration policies in post-1945 Western Europe.","PeriodicalId":45974,"journal":{"name":"Refuge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refuge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1050851ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article departs from the discussion by Stephen Castles on the migration-asylum nexus by focusing on the political and cultural effects of the summer of immigration in 2015. It argues for a conceptualization of the asylum-migration nexus within the framework of Anibal Quijano’s “coloniality of power” by developing the analytical framework of the “coloniality of migration.” Through the analytical framework of the “coloniality of migration” the connection between racial capitalism and the asylum-migration nexus is explored. It does so by first focusing on the economic and political links between asylum and migration, and how both constitute each other. On these grounds, it discusses how asylum and migration policies produce hierarchical categories of migrants and refugees, producing a nomenclature drawing on an imaginary reminiscent of the orientalist and racialized practices of European colonialism and imperialism. In a second step, it focuses on migration and asylum policies as inherent to a logic of racialization of the workforce. It does so by first exploring the racial coding of immigration policies within the context of settler colonial-ism and transatlantic White European migration to the Américas and Oceania in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and second, by discussing migration policies in post-1945 Western Europe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民的殖民性和“难民危机”:论庇护-移民关系、跨大西洋欧洲白人定居者殖民主义-移民和种族资本主义
本文与Stephen Castles关于移民-庇护关系的讨论不同,将重点放在2015年移民之夏的政治和文化影响上。它通过发展“移民的殖民性”的分析框架,主张在阿尼巴尔·基哈诺的“权力的殖民性”框架内对庇护-移民关系进行概念化。通过“移民的殖民性”的分析框架,探讨了种族资本主义与庇护移民关系之间的联系。为此,它首先关注庇护与移民之间的经济和政治联系,以及两者如何相互构成。基于这些理由,它讨论了庇护和移民政策如何产生移民和难民的等级分类,产生了一种虚构的命名法,让人想起欧洲殖民主义和帝国主义的东方主义和种族化实践。第二步,它将重点放在移民和庇护政策上,认为这是劳动力种族化逻辑所固有的。本书首先探讨了19世纪和20世纪移民殖民主义和跨大西洋欧洲白人移民到美国和大洋洲的背景下移民政策的种族编码,其次讨论了1945年后西欧的移民政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Refuge
Refuge DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
(Mis)trusted Contact: Resettlement Knowledge Assets and the Third Space of Refugee Reception Introduction: Special Issue on Private Sponsorship in Canada A Reflexive View of Refugee Integration and Inclusion: A Case Study of the Mennonite Central Committee and the Private Sponsorship of Refugees Program How Do Sponsors Think about "Month 13"? Forging African Communities: Mobility, Integration, and Belonging by Oliver Bakewell and Loren B. Landau (Eds.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1