Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Determining Plane Figure Properties

Edumatika Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.32939/ejrpm.v5i1.1336
N. W. Ashari, Muhammad Ikram, I. Dani
{"title":"Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Determining Plane Figure Properties","authors":"N. W. Ashari, Muhammad Ikram, I. Dani","doi":"10.32939/ejrpm.v5i1.1336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The plane figure is compulsory mathematics material at all levels of education, including junior high school. However, students still make frequent mistakes in understanding the plane figures' properties. In understanding this topic, students must have the skill to think critically. Critical thinking is a process of rational thinking before deciding or taking action in a more specific direction. Therefore, this study aims to determine students' skills in defining the plane figure's properties. The method used in this research is a qualitative research method. Tests and interviews were used to determine the students' skills in determining the properties of the plane figure. Researchers determined five indicators used to determine students' skills in determining the nature of the plane figure: focusing and formulating, observing and assessing observation results, making and assessing inductions, defining and assessing definitions, and integrating decisions. Three junior high school students were selected as research subjects with high, medium, and low skill levels, respectively. The data analysis used descriptive analysis using method triangulation and theory triangulation. The research results show two students' mathematical critical thinking patterns based on their skills. The subjects with high and medium skills can solve all problems with a small error rate and fulfill all predetermined critical thinking skills indicators. On the other hand, the subject with low skills has not been able to solve problems, so no critical thinking indicators are met. There is a misunderstanding on high and moderate skills subjects. Neither understand the meaning of opposite angles and parallel lines in specific plane figures. It can be a reference for teachers to improve students' understanding of mathematical concepts.","PeriodicalId":34056,"journal":{"name":"Edumatika","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edumatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v5i1.1336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The plane figure is compulsory mathematics material at all levels of education, including junior high school. However, students still make frequent mistakes in understanding the plane figures' properties. In understanding this topic, students must have the skill to think critically. Critical thinking is a process of rational thinking before deciding or taking action in a more specific direction. Therefore, this study aims to determine students' skills in defining the plane figure's properties. The method used in this research is a qualitative research method. Tests and interviews were used to determine the students' skills in determining the properties of the plane figure. Researchers determined five indicators used to determine students' skills in determining the nature of the plane figure: focusing and formulating, observing and assessing observation results, making and assessing inductions, defining and assessing definitions, and integrating decisions. Three junior high school students were selected as research subjects with high, medium, and low skill levels, respectively. The data analysis used descriptive analysis using method triangulation and theory triangulation. The research results show two students' mathematical critical thinking patterns based on their skills. The subjects with high and medium skills can solve all problems with a small error rate and fulfill all predetermined critical thinking skills indicators. On the other hand, the subject with low skills has not been able to solve problems, so no critical thinking indicators are met. There is a misunderstanding on high and moderate skills subjects. Neither understand the meaning of opposite angles and parallel lines in specific plane figures. It can be a reference for teachers to improve students' understanding of mathematical concepts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生判断平面图形属性的批判性思维能力分析
平面图形是包括初中在内的各级教育的必修数学教材。然而,学生在理解平面图形的性质方面仍然经常犯错误。为了理解这个主题,学生必须具备批判性思考的技能。批判性思维是在决定或采取更具体的行动之前进行理性思考的过程。因此,本研究旨在确定学生在定义平面人物属性方面的技能。本研究采用的方法是定性研究方法。通过测试和访谈来确定学生在确定平面图形属性方面的技能。研究人员确定了五个指标,用来衡量学生在确定平面图形性质方面的技能:聚焦和形成、观察和评估观察结果、做出和评估归纳、定义和评估定义、整合决策。选取高、中、低技能水平的三名初中生作为研究对象。数据分析采用描述性分析,采用三角法和理论三角法。研究结果显示了两名学生的数学批判性思维模式基于他们的技能。具有中高技能的被试能够以较小的错误率解决所有问题,并完成所有预定的批判性思维技能指标。另一方面,低技能的被试没有能力解决问题,因此没有达到批判性思维指标。在高技能和中等技能科目上存在误解。他们都不理解对角和平行线在特定平面图形中的意义。可以为教师提高学生对数学概念的理解提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Skills in Solving HOTS Problems Effect of STEM Learning Method on Students’ Mathematical Concepts Understanding in Social Arithmetics Topic Mathematical Reasoning of the Quran Reciting Student by the Quran Recitation Ability Ethnomathematics Exploration: The Beads Basket Craft Context for Mathematics Learning Flipped Classroom Effect on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1