Effect of abrasive particle morphology along with other influencing parameters in magnetic abrasive finishing process

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Mechanics & Industry Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1051/MECA/2021013
F. Ahmadi, Hassan Beiramlou, P. Yazdi
{"title":"Effect of abrasive particle morphology along with other influencing parameters in magnetic abrasive finishing process","authors":"F. Ahmadi, Hassan Beiramlou, P. Yazdi","doi":"10.1051/MECA/2021013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surface characteristics play a very important role in medical implants and among surface features, surface roughness is very effective in some medical applications. Among the various methods used to improve surface roughness, magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) process has been widely used in medical engineering. In this study, the effect of abrasive particle morphology along with four other process parameters, including type of work metal, finishing time, speed of finishing operation, and the type of abrasive powder were experimentally evaluated. Full factorial technique was used for design of experiment. Three commonly used metals in orthopedic implants i.e., Ti-6Al-4V alloy, AZ31 alloy and austenitic stainless-steel 316LVM, were selected for this study. Also, two types of magnetic abrasive particles with different shapes (spherical and rod-shaped) were considered in the experiments. The results of the experiments indicated that the morphology of the abrasive particles and the finishing time had the greatest effect on surface roughness and using rod-shaped abrasive particles resulted in better surface quality comparing to the spherical particles. Besides, the surface quality of steel 316LVM after MAF was the best among the other examined metals. Interaction plots of ANOVA also showed that interactions of material with morphology of abrasive particles, and material with machining time were found to be reasonably significant.","PeriodicalId":49018,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics & Industry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics & Industry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/MECA/2021013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Surface characteristics play a very important role in medical implants and among surface features, surface roughness is very effective in some medical applications. Among the various methods used to improve surface roughness, magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) process has been widely used in medical engineering. In this study, the effect of abrasive particle morphology along with four other process parameters, including type of work metal, finishing time, speed of finishing operation, and the type of abrasive powder were experimentally evaluated. Full factorial technique was used for design of experiment. Three commonly used metals in orthopedic implants i.e., Ti-6Al-4V alloy, AZ31 alloy and austenitic stainless-steel 316LVM, were selected for this study. Also, two types of magnetic abrasive particles with different shapes (spherical and rod-shaped) were considered in the experiments. The results of the experiments indicated that the morphology of the abrasive particles and the finishing time had the greatest effect on surface roughness and using rod-shaped abrasive particles resulted in better surface quality comparing to the spherical particles. Besides, the surface quality of steel 316LVM after MAF was the best among the other examined metals. Interaction plots of ANOVA also showed that interactions of material with morphology of abrasive particles, and material with machining time were found to be reasonably significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁磨料精加工过程中磨粒形貌及其他影响参数的影响
表面特性在医疗植入物中起着非常重要的作用,其中表面粗糙度在一些医疗应用中是非常有效的。在各种提高表面粗糙度的方法中,磁磨料抛光(MAF)工艺在医学工程中得到了广泛的应用。在这项研究中,磨料颗粒形态以及其他四个工艺参数,包括工作金属类型,精加工时间,精加工操作速度和磨料粉末类型,对磨料颗粒形貌的影响进行了实验评估。试验设计采用全因子技术。本研究选择了三种骨科植入物常用的金属,即Ti-6Al-4V合金、AZ31合金和316LVM奥氏体不锈钢。此外,实验中还考虑了两种不同形状的磁性磨粒(球形和棒状)。实验结果表明,磨料颗粒的形貌和抛光时间对表面粗糙度的影响最大,使用棒状磨料颗粒比使用球形磨料颗粒表面质量更好。此外,316LVM钢经MAF处理后的表面质量是其他金属中最好的。方差分析的相互作用图也表明,材料与磨料颗粒形态的相互作用以及材料与加工时间的相互作用相当显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mechanics & Industry
Mechanics & Industry ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL-MECHANICS
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An International Journal on Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Applications With papers from industry, Research and Development departments and academic institutions, this journal acts as an interface between research and industry, coordinating and disseminating scientific and technical mechanical research in relation to industrial activities. Targeted readers are technicians, engineers, executives, researchers, and teachers who are working in industrial companies as managers or in Research and Development departments, technical centres, laboratories, universities, technical and engineering schools. The journal is an AFM (Association Française de Mécanique) publication.
期刊最新文献
Numerical investigation of thermal buckling and post-buckling behavior of an EN AW 6016-T4 car roof assembled in a steel body-in-white Analyzing the influence of lifter design and ball mill speed on grinding performance, particle behavior and contact forces A neural network-based data-driven local modeling of spotwelded plates under impact Multi-objective shape optimization of developable Bézier-like surfaces using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm Experimental quantification of heat haze errors in stereo-DIC displacements: Application to thermoplastics thermoforming temperature range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1