Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Educational on Nursing Students

Youjung Kim, Yun-Chule Jung
{"title":"Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Educational on Nursing Students","authors":"Youjung Kim, Yun-Chule Jung","doi":"10.22156/CS4SMB.2021.11.08.224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to find out whether critical thinking education improves critical thinking disposition of nursing college students. The participants were 173 second graders. The education was conducted three times, two hours each, for a total of six hours of intensive critical thinking education and continuous education during Nursing Process class. The survey was conducted in the first week and 14th week of the course. The collected data was analyzed with IBM SPSS 21.0. Findings: The results showed that the average rating of critical thinking before and after education was raised(3.65±0.41→3.83±0.46, t=6.796, p<.001). Among the sub-items, creativity, which had the lowest score before education, has been raised the most(3.13±0.78→3.43±0.86, t = 5.842, p<.001). The effectiveness of critical thinking education has been confirmed. But it is a lack of evidence on the relevance of the details. It is suggested that repeated research is needed to ensure the quality of education, develop teaching methods, and develop tools for verifying effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":15438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Convergence Information Technology","volume":"71 1","pages":"224-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Convergence Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2021.11.08.224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out whether critical thinking education improves critical thinking disposition of nursing college students. The participants were 173 second graders. The education was conducted three times, two hours each, for a total of six hours of intensive critical thinking education and continuous education during Nursing Process class. The survey was conducted in the first week and 14th week of the course. The collected data was analyzed with IBM SPSS 21.0. Findings: The results showed that the average rating of critical thinking before and after education was raised(3.65±0.41→3.83±0.46, t=6.796, p<.001). Among the sub-items, creativity, which had the lowest score before education, has been raised the most(3.13±0.78→3.43±0.86, t = 5.842, p<.001). The effectiveness of critical thinking education has been confirmed. But it is a lack of evidence on the relevance of the details. It is suggested that repeated research is needed to ensure the quality of education, develop teaching methods, and develop tools for verifying effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护生批判性思维教育的效果
摘要本研究旨在探讨批判性思维教育是否能改善护理大学生的批判性思维倾向。参与者是173名二年级学生。教育分三次,每次2小时,在护理过程课上进行强化批判性思维教育和继续教育,共6小时。调查在课程的第一周和第14周进行。采用IBM SPSS 21.0对收集的数据进行分析。结果:学生在接受批判性思维教育前后,批判性思维的平均分有所提高(3.65±0.41→3.83±0.46,t=6.796, p< 0.001)。各分项中,教育前得分最低的创造力提高幅度最大(3.13±0.78→3.43±0.86,t = 5.842, p< 0.001)。批判性思维教育的有效性已得到证实。但缺乏证据证明这些细节的相关性。建议通过反复研究来保证教育质量,开发教学方法,开发验证有效性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on Improved Sum Rate of Cross-Correlated SC NOMA toward 6G URLLC Factors influencing health-related quality of life in middle-aged by stress perception Relationship between Academic and Clinical Practice Stress and Major Satisfaction in Nursing Students Reduction of Source/Drain Series Resistance in Fin Channel MOSFETs Using Selective Oxidation Technique Antibacterial activity of grapefruit seed extract and seven kinds of essential and blended essential oils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1