Real-world clinical outcomes of anticancer treatments and prognostic factors in patients with advanced melanoma in China

C. Cui, Xieqiao Yan, Ben Li, L. Si, C. Zhihong, X. Sheng, B. Lian, Xuan Wang, L. Mao, B. Tang, Li Zhou, X. Bai, Si-ming Li, Jun Guo
{"title":"Real-world clinical outcomes of anticancer treatments and prognostic factors in patients with advanced melanoma in China","authors":"C. Cui, Xieqiao Yan, Ben Li, L. Si, C. Zhihong, X. Sheng, B. Lian, Xuan Wang, L. Mao, B. Tang, Li Zhou, X. Bai, Si-ming Li, Jun Guo","doi":"10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: China has much lower 5-year survival rates among melanoma patients than Western countries. This retrospective study describes real-world clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in locally advanced/metastatic melanoma in China. Materials and methods: Adults patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma treated between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015, at the Beijing Cancer Hospital were eligible (data cutoff: December 31, 2017). The Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used to estimate the median value of time-to-event outcomes. A Cox proportional hazards model was simulated to evaluate associations of patients’ characteristics with survival. Results: Overall, there were 221 and 116 Chinese locally advanced and/or metastatic melanoma patients were enrolled in the first line (1L) and the second line (2L) treatments, respectively. The real-world objective response rate was <10% (1L: 6.3%; 2L: 3.4%); median progression-free survival was under 4 months (1L: 3.5; 2L: 2.3); median overall survival (OS) was <1 year (1L: 10.5; 2L: 7.5) with a low 12-month OS rate (43.5% for 1L, 30.5% for 2L). Based on univariate analyses, those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≥2 (vs. ECOG=0) in 1L, and 2L treatment (vs. 1L treatment) or ECOG ≥2 (vs. ECOG=1) among 1L/2L were associated with statistically significantly worse outcomes. Conclusion: The current clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma patients in China are poor. High ECOG performance score independently increase risk of death both from 1L and 2L treatments, suggesting a high unmet medical need for immunotherapy in advanced melanoma.","PeriodicalId":42930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery-Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: China has much lower 5-year survival rates among melanoma patients than Western countries. This retrospective study describes real-world clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in locally advanced/metastatic melanoma in China. Materials and methods: Adults patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma treated between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015, at the Beijing Cancer Hospital were eligible (data cutoff: December 31, 2017). The Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used to estimate the median value of time-to-event outcomes. A Cox proportional hazards model was simulated to evaluate associations of patients’ characteristics with survival. Results: Overall, there were 221 and 116 Chinese locally advanced and/or metastatic melanoma patients were enrolled in the first line (1L) and the second line (2L) treatments, respectively. The real-world objective response rate was <10% (1L: 6.3%; 2L: 3.4%); median progression-free survival was under 4 months (1L: 3.5; 2L: 2.3); median overall survival (OS) was <1 year (1L: 10.5; 2L: 7.5) with a low 12-month OS rate (43.5% for 1L, 30.5% for 2L). Based on univariate analyses, those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≥2 (vs. ECOG=0) in 1L, and 2L treatment (vs. 1L treatment) or ECOG ≥2 (vs. ECOG=1) among 1L/2L were associated with statistically significantly worse outcomes. Conclusion: The current clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma patients in China are poor. High ECOG performance score independently increase risk of death both from 1L and 2L treatments, suggesting a high unmet medical need for immunotherapy in advanced melanoma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国晚期黑色素瘤患者抗癌治疗和预后因素的实际临床结果
目的:中国黑色素瘤患者的5年生存率远低于西方国家。本回顾性研究描述了中国局部晚期/转移性黑色素瘤的真实临床结果和预后因素。材料和方法:纳入2014年1月1日至2015年12月31日在北京肿瘤医院接受治疗的无法切除的III期或IV期黑色素瘤成人患者(数据截止日期:2017年12月31日)。Kaplan-Meier法和Log-Rank检验用于估计事件发生时间结局的中位数。模拟Cox比例风险模型来评估患者特征与生存的关系。结果:总体而言,分别有221名和116名中国局部晚期和/或转移性黑色素瘤患者入组一线(1L)和二线(2L)治疗。真实世界客观有效率<10% (1L: 6.3%;2 l: 3.4%);中位无进展生存期低于4个月(1L: 3.5;2 l: 2.3);中位总生存期(OS) <1年(1L: 10.5;2L: 7.5), 12个月OS率低(1L为43.5%,2L为30.5%)。基于单因素分析,在1L组中ECOG表现状态≥2 (vs. ECOG=0),在1L/2L组中接受2L治疗(vs. 1L治疗)或ECOG≥2 (vs. ECOG=1)的患者预后较差,具有统计学意义。结论:目前中国晚期黑色素瘤患者的临床预后较差。高ECOG表现评分独立地增加了1L和2L治疗的死亡风险,表明晚期黑色素瘤免疫治疗的医疗需求未得到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Retifanlimab: a breakthrough for the management of Merkel cell carcinoma Outcomes of the distal rectal cancer treatment depending on the type of sphincter-sparing surgery Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the urachus: a practical overview of a broad differential diagnosis: case report Spatial and temporal epidemiological analysis on the mortality rate of female breast cancer in Suzhou, China: 2006–2020 Role of Denosumab in the Management of Giant Cell Tumor, a Cross Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1