Why at All Complain?: “Bad” Poetry and Denatured Form in Spenser’s Daphnaïda

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1086/706177
R. Brown
{"title":"Why at All Complain?: “Bad” Poetry and Denatured Form in Spenser’s Daphnaïda","authors":"R. Brown","doi":"10.1086/706177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How should we read Daphnaïda—as Spenser’s worst poem or as covert advocacy on Spenser’s part for Arthur Gorges? In the light of such divergent recent approaches, this essay considers the poem through its formal choices and the ways in which such framing devices ironize and complicate its protagonist. It begins by rereading the monotonous quality of Alycon’s long lament, suggesting that Spenser uses devices that critically align Alcyon with poets of the previous age in the choice of a particular line shape. It then explores the ways in which this characterization draws on aspects of contemporary drama in the presentation of him as an affectively problematic figure—in this reading, metrical allusion to the drama contributes to the ironic characterization of the poem’s protagonist. The connection between Daphnaïda and contemporary poetry is enhanced by a detailed account of the way Alcyon’s complaint rewrites and “denatures” the famous contemporary sonnet “Like to a Hermite poore in place obscure” before turning to the poem’s complex bibliographical relationship with the Complaints volume. Finally, analysis of the stanza reveals it as denatured rhyme royal, designed to frustrate the eloquent tonalities of the original form.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/706177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How should we read Daphnaïda—as Spenser’s worst poem or as covert advocacy on Spenser’s part for Arthur Gorges? In the light of such divergent recent approaches, this essay considers the poem through its formal choices and the ways in which such framing devices ironize and complicate its protagonist. It begins by rereading the monotonous quality of Alycon’s long lament, suggesting that Spenser uses devices that critically align Alcyon with poets of the previous age in the choice of a particular line shape. It then explores the ways in which this characterization draws on aspects of contemporary drama in the presentation of him as an affectively problematic figure—in this reading, metrical allusion to the drama contributes to the ironic characterization of the poem’s protagonist. The connection between Daphnaïda and contemporary poetry is enhanced by a detailed account of the way Alcyon’s complaint rewrites and “denatures” the famous contemporary sonnet “Like to a Hermite poore in place obscure” before turning to the poem’s complex bibliographical relationship with the Complaints volume. Finally, analysis of the stanza reveals it as denatured rhyme royal, designed to frustrate the eloquent tonalities of the original form.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么要抱怨?:斯宾塞的“坏”诗与形式变性Daphnaïda
我们应该如何阅读Daphnaïda-as斯宾塞最糟糕的诗,或者作为斯宾塞对亚瑟·格尔斯的暗中支持?鉴于这些不同的近期研究方法,本文通过诗歌的形式选择和这种框架装置讽刺和使其主角复杂化的方式来考虑这首诗。它首先重读了埃利康长篇悲歌的单调特质,表明斯宾塞在选择特定的线条形状时,使用了一种将埃利康与前一个时代的诗人批判性地结合在一起的手段。然后,它探讨了这一人物塑造是如何利用当代戏剧的一些方面来呈现他作为一个情感上有问题的人物——在这篇阅读中,对戏剧的格律典故有助于对诗歌主角的讽刺塑造。Daphnaïda与当代诗歌之间的联系通过详细描述Alcyon的抱怨如何重写和“改变”著名的当代十四行诗“像一个Hermite穷人在模糊的地方”的方式而得到加强,然后转向诗歌与投诉卷的复杂书目关系。最后,对这一节的分析表明,它是一种变性的皇家韵律,旨在挫败原形式的雄辩音调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter “Soveraigne place”: Spenser with Henri Lefebvre Thinking through Symbionts: Spenser with Donna Haraway On Dissonance and Late Style: Spenser with Theodor W. Adorno In the Person of the Author: A Response to “Imagined Companions”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1