Genetic association of UGT1A1 promoter c.-3279T>G, and c.-3156G>A variants with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in an Iranian Population

Nasim Pouralizadeh, G. Maamouri, Abbas Boskabadi, H. Boskabadi, H. Rafatpanah, Ali Moadi, Hassan Mehrad‐Majd
{"title":"Genetic association of UGT1A1 promoter c.-3279T>G, and c.-3156G>A variants with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in an Iranian Population","authors":"Nasim Pouralizadeh, G. Maamouri, Abbas Boskabadi, H. Boskabadi, H. Rafatpanah, Ali Moadi, Hassan Mehrad‐Majd","doi":"10.22038/IJN.2021.50368.1884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several studies have reported that two promotor c.-3279T>G, and c.-3156G>A variants in UDP- glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) gene may contribute to neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. However, these variants have not been investigated in Iranian neonates. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine if the UGT1A1 promoter variants are significant risk factors associated with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Methods: A total of 178 unrelated neonates comprised 95 infants with neonatal jaundice and 83 healthy controls were enrolled. Using fresh blood DNA, each individual was genotyped by PCR-RFLP and COP-PCR at nucleotides -3279, and -3156, respectively. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of UGT1A1 promoter variants with the presence of significant hyperbilirubinemia. Anthropometric indices, and clinical variables were also compared between the different genotype groups. Results: Allele and genotype analysis of the c.-3279T>G, and c.-3156G>A variants showed no significant association with the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia neither in the crude nor after adjustment for gestational age, gender, and birth weight in different genetic models (P>0.05). However, in haplotype-association analysis, only one haplotype (A-T) was found to be associated with the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (OR=0.19, 95% CI; [0.18–0.20], P=0.001). Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate c.-3279T>G, and c.-3156G>A variants alone may contribute to the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Iranian neonates. However, A-T haplotype may play a significant role in increasing the risk of hyperbilirubinemia.","PeriodicalId":14584,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJN.2021.50368.1884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Several studies have reported that two promotor c.-3279T>G, and c.-3156G>A variants in UDP- glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) gene may contribute to neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. However, these variants have not been investigated in Iranian neonates. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine if the UGT1A1 promoter variants are significant risk factors associated with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Methods: A total of 178 unrelated neonates comprised 95 infants with neonatal jaundice and 83 healthy controls were enrolled. Using fresh blood DNA, each individual was genotyped by PCR-RFLP and COP-PCR at nucleotides -3279, and -3156, respectively. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of UGT1A1 promoter variants with the presence of significant hyperbilirubinemia. Anthropometric indices, and clinical variables were also compared between the different genotype groups. Results: Allele and genotype analysis of the c.-3279T>G, and c.-3156G>A variants showed no significant association with the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia neither in the crude nor after adjustment for gestational age, gender, and birth weight in different genetic models (P>0.05). However, in haplotype-association analysis, only one haplotype (A-T) was found to be associated with the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (OR=0.19, 95% CI; [0.18–0.20], P=0.001). Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate c.-3279T>G, and c.-3156G>A variants alone may contribute to the risk of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Iranian neonates. However, A-T haplotype may play a significant role in increasing the risk of hyperbilirubinemia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗人群中UGT1A1启动子c - 3279t >G和c - 3156g >A变异与新生儿高胆红素血症的遗传关系
背景:一些研究报道UDP-葡萄糖醛酸糖基转移酶(UGT1A1)基因的两个启动子c - 3279t >G和c - 3156g >A变异可能与新生儿高胆红素血症有关。然而,这些变异尚未在伊朗新生儿中进行调查。这项横断面研究旨在确定UGT1A1启动子变异是否与新生儿高胆红素血症相关的重要危险因素。方法:178例无血缘关系的新生儿,其中95例为新生儿黄疸,83例为健康对照。利用新鲜血液DNA,分别在核苷酸-3279和-3156处进行PCR-RFLP和COP-PCR分型。进行Logistic回归分析以评估UGT1A1启动子变异与显著高胆红素血症存在的关系。比较不同基因型组间的人体测量指标和临床指标。结果:不同遗传模型中c - 3279t >G和c - 3156g >A突变体的等位基因和基因型分析显示,无论在原始还是经胎龄、性别、出生体重调整后,c - 3279t >G和c - 3156g >A突变体与新生儿高胆红素血症的风险均无显著相关性(P>0.05)。然而,在单倍型关联分析中,仅发现一种单倍型(A-T)与新生儿高胆红素血症的风险相关(OR=0.19, 95% CI;[0.18 - -0.20], P = 0.001)。结论:本研究未能证明c - 3279t >G,而c - 3156g >A变异本身可能与伊朗新生儿高胆红素血症的风险有关。然而,a - t单倍型可能在增加高胆红素血症的风险中起重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiofrequency Ablation of Umbilical Cord for Reduction of Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence: A Case Series Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: A Retrospective Study among 1,119 Moroccan Newborns Admitted to the National Reference Center in Neonatology and Nutrition, Rabat, Morocco Association of Neuregulin Levels and Neuregulin-1 Polymorphism with Short-term Morbidities in Preterm Neonates Caudal regression syndrome: A case report and literature of review Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on health of preterm infants in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1