Historically restricted or historically empowered? Differences in access to historical content knowledge between low‐ and high‐SES pupils

David Rosenlund, Magnus Persson
{"title":"Historically restricted or historically empowered? Differences in access to historical content knowledge between low‐ and high‐SES pupils","authors":"David Rosenlund, Magnus Persson","doi":"10.1002/curj.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the study presented in this article, the aim is to further the understanding regarding the differences between pupils (aged 15–16) from schools with low or high socio‐economic status (SES), regarding the amount and diversity of content knowledge in history that they have acquired by the end of compulsory schooling. Following a definition of historical content knowledge, we situate the concept in relation to other aspects of the history school subject. This is done to visualize historical content knowledge's central role in more complex aspects of the subject. The empirical material used in the study is pupils' responses on both selected and constructed response items on the Swedish national test in history. In the study, a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches is used. The results show not only that pupils in low‐SES schools provide fewer examples of historical content knowledge. We can also establish that the historical content knowledge of pupils from high‐SES schools represents several perspectives while there are few perspectives present in the responses from pupils in low‐SES schools. The results are used to discuss how the differences between pupils in low‐ and high‐SES schools may affect their possibilities for educational success and active participation in society.","PeriodicalId":93147,"journal":{"name":"The curriculum journal","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The curriculum journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the study presented in this article, the aim is to further the understanding regarding the differences between pupils (aged 15–16) from schools with low or high socio‐economic status (SES), regarding the amount and diversity of content knowledge in history that they have acquired by the end of compulsory schooling. Following a definition of historical content knowledge, we situate the concept in relation to other aspects of the history school subject. This is done to visualize historical content knowledge's central role in more complex aspects of the subject. The empirical material used in the study is pupils' responses on both selected and constructed response items on the Swedish national test in history. In the study, a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches is used. The results show not only that pupils in low‐SES schools provide fewer examples of historical content knowledge. We can also establish that the historical content knowledge of pupils from high‐SES schools represents several perspectives while there are few perspectives present in the responses from pupils in low‐SES schools. The results are used to discuss how the differences between pupils in low‐ and high‐SES schools may affect their possibilities for educational success and active participation in society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史上的限制还是历史上的授权?低-高- SES学生获得历史内容知识的差异
在本文中提出的研究中,目的是进一步了解来自低社会经济地位(SES)或高社会经济地位(SES)学校的学生(15-16岁)在义务教育结束时获得的历史内容知识的数量和多样性方面的差异。根据历史内容知识的定义,我们将这一概念与历史学校学科的其他方面联系起来。这样做是为了可视化历史内容知识在学科更复杂方面的中心作用。研究中使用的经验材料是学生对瑞典国家历史测试中选择和构建的反应项目的反应。本研究采用定性与定量相结合的方法。结果表明,低社会经济地位学校的学生不仅提供较少的历史内容知识实例。我们还可以确定,高社会经济地位学校学生的历史内容知识代表了几个角度,而低社会经济地位学校学生的回答中却很少有观点。研究结果用于讨论高低社会经济地位学校学生之间的差异如何影响他们在教育上取得成功和积极参与社会的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward a grammar of curriculum practice: Embracing new conceptions of curriculum and curriculum planning By Edmund C.Short, State University of New York Press. 2023. 160 pp. $33.95 (paperback). ISBN: 9781438493473 Rethinking student teachers' professional learning in Wales: Promoting reflection‐in‐action Development and evaluation of neuroscience lesson content to improve Key Stage 3 (11–14 year old) students' understanding of the early years in England Reclaiming accountability through collaborative curriculum enquiry: New directions in teacher evaluation Barriers to curriculum accessibility for students with visual impairment in general education setting: The experience of lower secondary school students in Senegal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1