Effectiveness of sowing methods and certain herbicides against dodder and annual weeds associated with flax

Azza E. Khaffagy, I. Soliman, Aml Elborhamy
{"title":"Effectiveness of sowing methods and certain herbicides against dodder and annual weeds associated with flax","authors":"Azza E. Khaffagy, I. Soliman, Aml Elborhamy","doi":"10.21608/ejarc.2022.119284.1000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two field experiments were conducted during 2019/20 and 2020/21 seasons to evaluate the influence of two sowing methods (broadcasting and drilling) and nine herbicides on dodder (Cuscuta epilinum), annual weeds and the productivity of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Economic evaluation of the interaction between sowing methods and weed control methods was also assessed. The application sequences of nine herbicides in six treatments included tribenuron-methyl 75% DF (Aonostar 75 DF) followed by fluazifop-p-butyl, 12.5% EC (Fusilade super 12.5% EC) (T1), tribenuron-methyl, 75% WG (Zinostar 75% WG) followed by (Fusilade super) (T2), bromoxynil octaoate, 24% EC (Brominal 24% EC) followed by clodinafop propargyl 2.5% + pinoxaden 2.5% (Traksos 5% EC) (T3), bromoxynil octanoate, 24% EC (Bromo plus 24% EC) followed by clodinafop propargyl 2.5% + pinoxaden 2.5% (Traksos) (T4), florasulam 7.5% + flumetsulam10% (Derby 17.5% SC) 17.5% SC followed by clethodim 12.5% EC (Select super 12.5% EC) (T5) and dicamba, 48% SL (Dimo up 48% SL) followed by (Select super) (T6). The herbicide treatments were compared to hand weeding (twice) (T7) and unweeded control (T8). The obtained results revealed that seed drilling method increased straw, seed, fiber and oil yield in both seasons, compared to broadcasting method. Herbicide treatments of T5, T6, T1 and T2, T3 and T4 decreased dry weight of dodder and annual weeds 90 days after application, in both seasons, as compared to unweeded control. The result suggested that seed drilling method combined with the herbicidal treatments of T5, T6, T1 and T2 were greatly effective against heavily infestation with dodder and total annual weeds. These practices reflected on greater fiber, oil seed yield and higher economic profit.","PeriodicalId":11430,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejarc.2022.119284.1000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during 2019/20 and 2020/21 seasons to evaluate the influence of two sowing methods (broadcasting and drilling) and nine herbicides on dodder (Cuscuta epilinum), annual weeds and the productivity of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Economic evaluation of the interaction between sowing methods and weed control methods was also assessed. The application sequences of nine herbicides in six treatments included tribenuron-methyl 75% DF (Aonostar 75 DF) followed by fluazifop-p-butyl, 12.5% EC (Fusilade super 12.5% EC) (T1), tribenuron-methyl, 75% WG (Zinostar 75% WG) followed by (Fusilade super) (T2), bromoxynil octaoate, 24% EC (Brominal 24% EC) followed by clodinafop propargyl 2.5% + pinoxaden 2.5% (Traksos 5% EC) (T3), bromoxynil octanoate, 24% EC (Bromo plus 24% EC) followed by clodinafop propargyl 2.5% + pinoxaden 2.5% (Traksos) (T4), florasulam 7.5% + flumetsulam10% (Derby 17.5% SC) 17.5% SC followed by clethodim 12.5% EC (Select super 12.5% EC) (T5) and dicamba, 48% SL (Dimo up 48% SL) followed by (Select super) (T6). The herbicide treatments were compared to hand weeding (twice) (T7) and unweeded control (T8). The obtained results revealed that seed drilling method increased straw, seed, fiber and oil yield in both seasons, compared to broadcasting method. Herbicide treatments of T5, T6, T1 and T2, T3 and T4 decreased dry weight of dodder and annual weeds 90 days after application, in both seasons, as compared to unweeded control. The result suggested that seed drilling method combined with the herbicidal treatments of T5, T6, T1 and T2 were greatly effective against heavily infestation with dodder and total annual weeds. These practices reflected on greater fiber, oil seed yield and higher economic profit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
播种方法和某些除草剂对与亚麻有关的菟丝子和一年生杂草的有效性
通过2019/20和2020/21两季的田间试验,评价了两种播种方式(撒播和钻播)和9种除草剂对菟菟子(Cuscuta epilinum)、一年生杂草和亚麻(Linum usitatissimum L.)产量的影响。对播种方式与除草方式相互作用的经济评价也进行了评价。9种除草剂在6个处理中的施用顺序依次为:三苯腈-甲基75% DF (Aonostar 75 DF)→氟唑磷-对丁基、12.5% EC (Fusilade超级12.5% EC) (T1)、三苯腈-甲基75% WG (Zinostar 75% WG)→Fusilade超级(T2)、八溴腈- 24% EC (Brominal 24% EC)→氯地那福丙炔2.5% + pinoxaden 2.5% (Traksos 5% EC) (T3)、辛酸溴腈、24% EC (Bromo + 24% EC),其次是氯地那福2.5%丙丙醇+ 2.5% pinoxaden (Traksos) (T4), florasulam 7.5% + flumetsulam10% (Derby 17.5% SC) 17.5% SC,其次是氯噻酮12.5% EC (Select super 12.5% EC) (T5)和麦草畏,48% SL (Dimo上升48% SL),其次是(Select super) (T6)。将除草剂处理与手除草(2次)(T7)和不除草(T8)进行比较。结果表明,与撒播法相比,播种法两季的秸秆、种子、纤维和油料产量均有所提高。与未除草对照相比,施用T5、T6、T1和T2、T3和T4处理在施用后90 d显著降低了菟丝子和一年生杂草的干重。结果表明,播种法与T5、T6、T1、T2除草处理配合使用,对菟丝子和年总杂草的严重侵害具有显著的防治效果。这些做法可以提高纤维和油籽产量,提高经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibacterial Activity of Potential Essential Oil Extracts against the American Foulbrood, Paenibacillus larvae larvae Influence of Electric Amplitude and the Frequency Level combinations on Venom Productivity of Honey Bee Colonies in Egypt Analysis of Tunisian Beekeepers' Perceptions in Honey Bee Diseases and Pests Management The Suitable Diurnal Time and Synchronized Period Required to Gain High Yield of Venom from Honeybee Colonies in Egypt Impact of Outcross Mating on Brood Rearing Activity and Honey Production of Local Honey Bees in Libya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1